利物浦药物不良反应概况(LAEP):土耳其版(LAEP-TR)的有效性和可靠性

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.4103/nsn.nsn_83_23
D. Dibek, Bülent Kılıç, Ibrahim Oztura, B. Baklan
{"title":"利物浦药物不良反应概况(LAEP):土耳其版(LAEP-TR)的有效性和可靠性","authors":"D. Dibek, Bülent Kılıç, Ibrahim Oztura, B. Baklan","doi":"10.4103/nsn.nsn_83_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Adverse effects should be questioned in outpatient clinics during routine visits. However, physicians have not yet had a questionnaire in Turkish for patients who take antiseizure medications (ASMs). The Liverpool Adverse Drug Events Profile “LAEP” was created to follow up on possible adverse effects of ASMs in different languages. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of LAEP for the Turkish-speaking population. Method: First, permission was requested from the authors of the original questionnaire. After that, English-Turkish and re-translations were made by two independent people, respectively. Finally, the questionnaire was administered to 10 people as a pilot study, and the final version was decided. Patients who were followed up at the epilepsy outpatient clinic of xxx Hospital and who had not changed antiseizure medications dosage for at least 3 months were included in the study. Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) coefficients were calculated for internal consistency. A consistency study was performed by applying the scale to the same patient group with an interval of 2 weeks. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed for validity analyses using the questionnaire, which was divided into three subdimensions, neurologic, psychiatric, and other system adverse effects. Results: Thirty-seven [male: 16 (43.2%) and female: 21 (56.8%)] patients were included for test-retest analysis. Consistency measurements (ICCs) were performed, and high correlations of ICC >0.70 were obtained for all items. The questionnaire was administered to 168 [male: 64 (38.1%) and female: 104 (61.9%)] patients for validity by factor analysis and reliability by Cronbach's α correlation. Three dimensions were obtained in factor analysis, classified as nervous system-related, psychiatric-related, and other system-related. The Cronbach α values were found as 0.804, 0.828, and 0.484, respectively. Conclusion: The LAEP-TR scale can be used in outpatient clinics on patients who use ASMs.","PeriodicalId":48555,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology","volume":"40 1","pages":"101 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The liverpool adverse drug events profile (LAEP): Validity and reliability of Turkish version (LAEP-TR)\",\"authors\":\"D. Dibek, Bülent Kılıç, Ibrahim Oztura, B. Baklan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/nsn.nsn_83_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Adverse effects should be questioned in outpatient clinics during routine visits. However, physicians have not yet had a questionnaire in Turkish for patients who take antiseizure medications (ASMs). The Liverpool Adverse Drug Events Profile “LAEP” was created to follow up on possible adverse effects of ASMs in different languages. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of LAEP for the Turkish-speaking population. Method: First, permission was requested from the authors of the original questionnaire. After that, English-Turkish and re-translations were made by two independent people, respectively. Finally, the questionnaire was administered to 10 people as a pilot study, and the final version was decided. Patients who were followed up at the epilepsy outpatient clinic of xxx Hospital and who had not changed antiseizure medications dosage for at least 3 months were included in the study. Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) coefficients were calculated for internal consistency. A consistency study was performed by applying the scale to the same patient group with an interval of 2 weeks. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed for validity analyses using the questionnaire, which was divided into three subdimensions, neurologic, psychiatric, and other system adverse effects. Results: Thirty-seven [male: 16 (43.2%) and female: 21 (56.8%)] patients were included for test-retest analysis. Consistency measurements (ICCs) were performed, and high correlations of ICC >0.70 were obtained for all items. The questionnaire was administered to 168 [male: 64 (38.1%) and female: 104 (61.9%)] patients for validity by factor analysis and reliability by Cronbach's α correlation. Three dimensions were obtained in factor analysis, classified as nervous system-related, psychiatric-related, and other system-related. The Cronbach α values were found as 0.804, 0.828, and 0.484, respectively. Conclusion: The LAEP-TR scale can be used in outpatient clinics on patients who use ASMs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/nsn.nsn_83_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nsn.nsn_83_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:在门诊常规就诊时应询问不良反应。然而,医生们还没有在土耳其对服用抗癫痫药物(asm)的患者进行问卷调查。利物浦不良药物事件概况“LAEP”是为了跟进不同语言的asm可能的不良反应而创建的。本研究旨在评估LAEP在土耳其语人群中的信度和效度。方法:首先,获得原问卷作者的许可。在那之后,英语-土耳其语和重新翻译分别由两个独立的人完成。最后,对10人进行问卷调查作为初步研究,确定最终版本。在xxx医院癫痫门诊随访且抗癫痫药物剂量至少3个月未改变的患者纳入研究。计算Cronbach’s α和类内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC)的内部一致性。将该量表应用于同一组患者,每隔2周进行一次一致性研究。问卷分为神经学、精神病学和其他系统不良反应三个维度,采用验证性因子分析进行效度分析。结果:纳入37例患者进行重测分析,其中男性16例(43.2%),女性21例(56.8%)。进行一致性测量(ICCs),所有项目的ICC相关性均为>.70。对168例患者(男64例(38.1%),女104例(61.9%))进行问卷调查,采用因子分析进行效度分析,采用Cronbach’s α相关进行信度分析。因子分析得到三个维度,分为神经系统相关、精神相关和其他系统相关。Cronbach α值分别为0.804、0.828和0.484。结论:LAEP-TR量表可用于门诊对asm患者的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The liverpool adverse drug events profile (LAEP): Validity and reliability of Turkish version (LAEP-TR)
Aim: Adverse effects should be questioned in outpatient clinics during routine visits. However, physicians have not yet had a questionnaire in Turkish for patients who take antiseizure medications (ASMs). The Liverpool Adverse Drug Events Profile “LAEP” was created to follow up on possible adverse effects of ASMs in different languages. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of LAEP for the Turkish-speaking population. Method: First, permission was requested from the authors of the original questionnaire. After that, English-Turkish and re-translations were made by two independent people, respectively. Finally, the questionnaire was administered to 10 people as a pilot study, and the final version was decided. Patients who were followed up at the epilepsy outpatient clinic of xxx Hospital and who had not changed antiseizure medications dosage for at least 3 months were included in the study. Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) coefficients were calculated for internal consistency. A consistency study was performed by applying the scale to the same patient group with an interval of 2 weeks. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed for validity analyses using the questionnaire, which was divided into three subdimensions, neurologic, psychiatric, and other system adverse effects. Results: Thirty-seven [male: 16 (43.2%) and female: 21 (56.8%)] patients were included for test-retest analysis. Consistency measurements (ICCs) were performed, and high correlations of ICC >0.70 were obtained for all items. The questionnaire was administered to 168 [male: 64 (38.1%) and female: 104 (61.9%)] patients for validity by factor analysis and reliability by Cronbach's α correlation. Three dimensions were obtained in factor analysis, classified as nervous system-related, psychiatric-related, and other system-related. The Cronbach α values were found as 0.804, 0.828, and 0.484, respectively. Conclusion: The LAEP-TR scale can be used in outpatient clinics on patients who use ASMs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology is the double blind peer-reviewed, open access, international publication organ of Turkish Society of Clinical Neurophysiology EEG-EMG. The journal is a quarterly publication, published in March, June, September and December and the publication language of the journal is English.
期刊最新文献
Transcranial Sonography in Parkinson’s Disease and Parkinsonism The liverpool adverse drug events profile (LAEP): Validity and reliability of Turkish version (LAEP-TR) Congenital myasthenic syndrome with a rare mutation diagnosed at adult age Comparison of surgery and local steroid injections for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial High-dose steroids versus standard treatment for myasthenic crisis: A single-center, longitudinal, 12-year retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1