英迪斯膀胱颈重建术:骨盆骨折尿道损伤尿道成形术后尿失禁的有效治疗方法

IF 0.2 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Clinical Urology Pub Date : 2022-07-06 DOI:10.1177/20514158221081312
Bobby Viswaroop Sistla, G. Gopalakrishnan
{"title":"英迪斯膀胱颈重建术:骨盆骨折尿道损伤尿道成形术后尿失禁的有效治疗方法","authors":"Bobby Viswaroop Sistla, G. Gopalakrishnan","doi":"10.1177/20514158221081312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We review our experience of Young-Dees bladder neck reconstruction (BNR) in treatment of urinary incontinence following anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI). Between January 2009 and June 2015, 11 patients presented with urinary incontinence following urethroplasty for PFUI. After evaluation with voiding cystourethrogram, urodynamics and cystoscopy, seven were found to be having genuine stress urinary incontinence. All seven underwent Young-Dees BNR. We also looked at whether there were any predictors of either poor or good outcome following surgical correction based on radiographic, endoscopic and urodynamic findings. Of the seven patients who had undergone Young-Dees BNR, four had urethroplasty at our centre (4/89, 4.4%). Median age was 23 years (range = 14–31 years), and median time to definitive treatment was 15 months (range = 9–126 months). Age at injury <15 years in two and >15 years in five. Four (56%) had pubic diastases, in three, it was secondary to the injury, and in one, it was consequent to facilitating urethroplasty via a formal transpubic approach. There were no consistent radiographic findings on the pre-operative studies which could predict whether the configuration of the bladder neck or the degree of bladder descent might result in incontinence. The number of prior attempts at urethroplasty when compared to a similar cohort was also non-contributory. At urodynamics, all bladders were stable on filling and there were no issues related to compliance with the bladder neck being occluded. The detrusor pressure generated during voiding and with the bladder neck occluded did help us to counsel patients regarding the outcome of surgery and if there would be a need for clean intermittent self-catheterisation following surgery. All patients are voiding via naturalis without the need for clean intermittent self-catheterisation and are socially continent. Young-Dees BNR may be a forgotten procedure but is worth revisiting in patients with stress urinary incontinence following successful urethroplasty for PFUI. It is cost-effective and can be done without the Leadbetter modification. Not applicable","PeriodicalId":15471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Young-Dees bladder neck reconstruction: An effective alternative in the treatment of urinary incontinence following urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injury\",\"authors\":\"Bobby Viswaroop Sistla, G. Gopalakrishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20514158221081312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We review our experience of Young-Dees bladder neck reconstruction (BNR) in treatment of urinary incontinence following anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI). Between January 2009 and June 2015, 11 patients presented with urinary incontinence following urethroplasty for PFUI. After evaluation with voiding cystourethrogram, urodynamics and cystoscopy, seven were found to be having genuine stress urinary incontinence. All seven underwent Young-Dees BNR. We also looked at whether there were any predictors of either poor or good outcome following surgical correction based on radiographic, endoscopic and urodynamic findings. Of the seven patients who had undergone Young-Dees BNR, four had urethroplasty at our centre (4/89, 4.4%). Median age was 23 years (range = 14–31 years), and median time to definitive treatment was 15 months (range = 9–126 months). Age at injury <15 years in two and >15 years in five. Four (56%) had pubic diastases, in three, it was secondary to the injury, and in one, it was consequent to facilitating urethroplasty via a formal transpubic approach. There were no consistent radiographic findings on the pre-operative studies which could predict whether the configuration of the bladder neck or the degree of bladder descent might result in incontinence. The number of prior attempts at urethroplasty when compared to a similar cohort was also non-contributory. At urodynamics, all bladders were stable on filling and there were no issues related to compliance with the bladder neck being occluded. The detrusor pressure generated during voiding and with the bladder neck occluded did help us to counsel patients regarding the outcome of surgery and if there would be a need for clean intermittent self-catheterisation following surgery. All patients are voiding via naturalis without the need for clean intermittent self-catheterisation and are socially continent. Young-Dees BNR may be a forgotten procedure but is worth revisiting in patients with stress urinary incontinence following successful urethroplasty for PFUI. It is cost-effective and can be done without the Leadbetter modification. Not applicable\",\"PeriodicalId\":15471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221081312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221081312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们回顾了Young-Deis膀胱颈重建术(BNR)治疗骨盆骨折尿道损伤(PFUI)吻合口尿道成形术后尿失禁的经验。2009年1月至2015年6月,11名患者在PFUI尿道成形术后出现尿失禁。经排尿膀胱尿道造影、尿动力学和膀胱镜检查评估,发现7人患有真正的压力性尿失禁。所有7人都接受了Young Dees BNR。我们还根据放射学、内窥镜和尿动力学检查结果,研究了手术矫正后是否有任何不良或良好结果的预测因素。在接受Young Dees BNR的7名患者中,有4名在我们中心进行了尿道成形术(4/89,4.4%)。中位年龄为23岁(范围=14-31岁),最终治疗的中位时间为15个月(范围=9-126个月)。受伤年龄五分之十五。4例(56%)有耻骨分离,其中3例是继发性损伤,其中1例是通过正式的经耻骨入路促进尿道成形术。术前研究中没有一致的放射学结果,可以预测膀胱颈的结构或膀胱下降的程度是否会导致失禁。与类似队列相比,先前尝试尿道成形术的次数也没有影响。在尿动力学方面,所有膀胱在充盈时都是稳定的,并且没有与膀胱颈阻塞的顺应性相关的问题。排尿过程中产生的逼尿肌压力和膀胱颈堵塞确实有助于我们就手术结果以及手术后是否需要清洁的间歇性自导尿管向患者提供建议。所有患者都是通过自然排尿,不需要清洁的间歇性自导尿管,并且社交距离较远。Young Dees BNR可能是一种被遗忘的手术,但在PFUI尿道成形术成功后的压力性尿失禁患者中值得重新审视。它具有成本效益,并且可以在没有Leadbetter修改的情况下完成。不适用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Young-Dees bladder neck reconstruction: An effective alternative in the treatment of urinary incontinence following urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injury
We review our experience of Young-Dees bladder neck reconstruction (BNR) in treatment of urinary incontinence following anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI). Between January 2009 and June 2015, 11 patients presented with urinary incontinence following urethroplasty for PFUI. After evaluation with voiding cystourethrogram, urodynamics and cystoscopy, seven were found to be having genuine stress urinary incontinence. All seven underwent Young-Dees BNR. We also looked at whether there were any predictors of either poor or good outcome following surgical correction based on radiographic, endoscopic and urodynamic findings. Of the seven patients who had undergone Young-Dees BNR, four had urethroplasty at our centre (4/89, 4.4%). Median age was 23 years (range = 14–31 years), and median time to definitive treatment was 15 months (range = 9–126 months). Age at injury <15 years in two and >15 years in five. Four (56%) had pubic diastases, in three, it was secondary to the injury, and in one, it was consequent to facilitating urethroplasty via a formal transpubic approach. There were no consistent radiographic findings on the pre-operative studies which could predict whether the configuration of the bladder neck or the degree of bladder descent might result in incontinence. The number of prior attempts at urethroplasty when compared to a similar cohort was also non-contributory. At urodynamics, all bladders were stable on filling and there were no issues related to compliance with the bladder neck being occluded. The detrusor pressure generated during voiding and with the bladder neck occluded did help us to counsel patients regarding the outcome of surgery and if there would be a need for clean intermittent self-catheterisation following surgery. All patients are voiding via naturalis without the need for clean intermittent self-catheterisation and are socially continent. Young-Dees BNR may be a forgotten procedure but is worth revisiting in patients with stress urinary incontinence following successful urethroplasty for PFUI. It is cost-effective and can be done without the Leadbetter modification. Not applicable
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Urology
Journal of Clinical Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic value of the abnormal digital rectal examination in the modern MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Comparison of the diagnostic utility of CHOKAI, STONE and STONE PLUS scores in predicting ureteral stones larger than 5 mm Quality of life and healthcare resource use in patients with bladder pain syndrome: A survey of UK patients Analysis of the learning curve for Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for a single surgeon Effectiveness of intravesical glycosaminoglycans in the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1