苏珊·金斯利·肯特的《性别:一部世界史》和凯伦·菲尼克斯的《性别规则:历史视角下的身份与帝国》(书评)

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Journal of World History Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1353/jwh.2023.a902056
Elizabeth M. Martin
{"title":"苏珊·金斯利·肯特的《性别:一部世界史》和凯伦·菲尼克斯的《性别规则:历史视角下的身份与帝国》(书评)","authors":"Elizabeth M. Martin","doi":"10.1353/jwh.2023.a902056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As historian Merry Wiesner-Hanks notes in her 2007 Journal of World History article “World History and the History of Women, Gender, and Sexuality,” more could be done to integrate the fields of world history and gender. Though fifteen years have passed since the article’s publication, and definite strides have been made, this argument still stands true. Two recent books aim to bridge the world history/gender history divide, Susan Kingsley Kent’sGender: AWorld History and Karen Phoenix’s Gender Rules: Identity and Empire in Historical Perspective. Both of these volumes embrace the “new” world history model, consciously striving to move beyond an emphasis on Europe and the United States or a “great civilizations” approach, and instead focusing on connections, interactions, and comparisons. Both aim to center specifically gender in world history, telling not solely a history of women, but one where masculinity is also a subject of study. Both","PeriodicalId":17466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World History","volume":"34 1","pages":"315 - 320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender: A World History by Susan Kingsley Kent, and: Gender Rules: Identity and Empire in Historical Perspective by Karen Phoenix (review)\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth M. Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jwh.2023.a902056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As historian Merry Wiesner-Hanks notes in her 2007 Journal of World History article “World History and the History of Women, Gender, and Sexuality,” more could be done to integrate the fields of world history and gender. Though fifteen years have passed since the article’s publication, and definite strides have been made, this argument still stands true. Two recent books aim to bridge the world history/gender history divide, Susan Kingsley Kent’sGender: AWorld History and Karen Phoenix’s Gender Rules: Identity and Empire in Historical Perspective. Both of these volumes embrace the “new” world history model, consciously striving to move beyond an emphasis on Europe and the United States or a “great civilizations” approach, and instead focusing on connections, interactions, and comparisons. Both aim to center specifically gender in world history, telling not solely a history of women, but one where masculinity is also a subject of study. Both\",\"PeriodicalId\":17466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World History\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"315 - 320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2023.a902056\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2023.a902056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正如历史学家梅里·威斯纳-汉克斯(Merry Wiesner-Hanks)在她2007年的《世界史》杂志上发表的文章《世界史与女性、性别和性行为的历史》中指出的那样,在整合世界史和性别领域方面可以做得更多。尽管自这篇文章发表以来已经过去了15年,取得了明显的进步,但这一论点仍然成立。最近出版的两本书旨在弥合世界史和性别史的鸿沟,苏珊·金斯利·肯特的《性别:世界史》和凯伦·菲尼克斯的《性别规则:历史视角下的身份和帝国》。这两卷书都采用了“新的”世界史模式,有意识地努力超越对欧洲和美国或“伟大文明”方法的强调,而是关注联系、互动和比较。两者都旨在以世界历史的性别为中心,不仅讲述女性的历史,而且讲述男性气概也是研究的主题。这两个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender: A World History by Susan Kingsley Kent, and: Gender Rules: Identity and Empire in Historical Perspective by Karen Phoenix (review)
As historian Merry Wiesner-Hanks notes in her 2007 Journal of World History article “World History and the History of Women, Gender, and Sexuality,” more could be done to integrate the fields of world history and gender. Though fifteen years have passed since the article’s publication, and definite strides have been made, this argument still stands true. Two recent books aim to bridge the world history/gender history divide, Susan Kingsley Kent’sGender: AWorld History and Karen Phoenix’s Gender Rules: Identity and Empire in Historical Perspective. Both of these volumes embrace the “new” world history model, consciously striving to move beyond an emphasis on Europe and the United States or a “great civilizations” approach, and instead focusing on connections, interactions, and comparisons. Both aim to center specifically gender in world history, telling not solely a history of women, but one where masculinity is also a subject of study. Both
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Devoted to historical analysis from a global point of view, the Journal of World History features a range of comparative and cross-cultural scholarship and encourages research on forces that work their influences across cultures and civilizations. Themes examined include large-scale population movements and economic fluctuations; cross-cultural transfers of technology; the spread of infectious diseases; long-distance trade; and the spread of religious faiths, ideas, and ideals. Individual subscription is by membership in the World History Association.
期刊最新文献
Between World-Imagining and World-Making: Politics of Fin-de-Siècle Universalism and Transimperial Indo-U.S. Brotherhood Colonial City, Global Entanglements: Intra-and Trans-Imperial Networks in George Town, 1786–1937 Empire, Kinship and Violence: Family Histories, Indigenous Rights and the Making of Settler Colonialism, 1770–1842 by Elizabeth Elbourne (review) Many Black Women of this Fortress: Graça, Mónica, and Adwoa, Three Enslaved Women of Portugal's African Empire by Kwasi Konadu (review) Inter-Imperial Entanglement: The British Claim to Portuguese Delagoa Bay in the Nineteenth Century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1