{"title":"苏珊·金斯利·肯特的《性别:一部世界史》和凯伦·菲尼克斯的《性别规则:历史视角下的身份与帝国》(书评)","authors":"Elizabeth M. Martin","doi":"10.1353/jwh.2023.a902056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As historian Merry Wiesner-Hanks notes in her 2007 Journal of World History article “World History and the History of Women, Gender, and Sexuality,” more could be done to integrate the fields of world history and gender. Though fifteen years have passed since the article’s publication, and definite strides have been made, this argument still stands true. Two recent books aim to bridge the world history/gender history divide, Susan Kingsley Kent’sGender: AWorld History and Karen Phoenix’s Gender Rules: Identity and Empire in Historical Perspective. Both of these volumes embrace the “new” world history model, consciously striving to move beyond an emphasis on Europe and the United States or a “great civilizations” approach, and instead focusing on connections, interactions, and comparisons. Both aim to center specifically gender in world history, telling not solely a history of women, but one where masculinity is also a subject of study. Both","PeriodicalId":17466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World History","volume":"34 1","pages":"315 - 320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender: A World History by Susan Kingsley Kent, and: Gender Rules: Identity and Empire in Historical Perspective by Karen Phoenix (review)\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth M. Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jwh.2023.a902056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As historian Merry Wiesner-Hanks notes in her 2007 Journal of World History article “World History and the History of Women, Gender, and Sexuality,” more could be done to integrate the fields of world history and gender. Though fifteen years have passed since the article’s publication, and definite strides have been made, this argument still stands true. Two recent books aim to bridge the world history/gender history divide, Susan Kingsley Kent’sGender: AWorld History and Karen Phoenix’s Gender Rules: Identity and Empire in Historical Perspective. Both of these volumes embrace the “new” world history model, consciously striving to move beyond an emphasis on Europe and the United States or a “great civilizations” approach, and instead focusing on connections, interactions, and comparisons. Both aim to center specifically gender in world history, telling not solely a history of women, but one where masculinity is also a subject of study. Both\",\"PeriodicalId\":17466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World History\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"315 - 320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2023.a902056\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2023.a902056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gender: A World History by Susan Kingsley Kent, and: Gender Rules: Identity and Empire in Historical Perspective by Karen Phoenix (review)
As historian Merry Wiesner-Hanks notes in her 2007 Journal of World History article “World History and the History of Women, Gender, and Sexuality,” more could be done to integrate the fields of world history and gender. Though fifteen years have passed since the article’s publication, and definite strides have been made, this argument still stands true. Two recent books aim to bridge the world history/gender history divide, Susan Kingsley Kent’sGender: AWorld History and Karen Phoenix’s Gender Rules: Identity and Empire in Historical Perspective. Both of these volumes embrace the “new” world history model, consciously striving to move beyond an emphasis on Europe and the United States or a “great civilizations” approach, and instead focusing on connections, interactions, and comparisons. Both aim to center specifically gender in world history, telling not solely a history of women, but one where masculinity is also a subject of study. Both
期刊介绍:
Devoted to historical analysis from a global point of view, the Journal of World History features a range of comparative and cross-cultural scholarship and encourages research on forces that work their influences across cultures and civilizations. Themes examined include large-scale population movements and economic fluctuations; cross-cultural transfers of technology; the spread of infectious diseases; long-distance trade; and the spread of religious faiths, ideas, and ideals. Individual subscription is by membership in the World History Association.