{"title":"学生在考虑与辅导员教育者跨界时的伦理决策","authors":"Stephanie T. Burns","doi":"10.1002/cvj.12094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Counselor education students (<i>N</i> = 224) rated 16 boundary-crossing scenarios involving counselor educators. They viewed boundary crossings as unethical and were aware of power differentials between the 2 groups. Next, they rated the scenarios again, after reviewing 1 of 4 ethical informational resources: relevant standards in the <i>ACA Code of Ethics</i> (American Counseling Association, 2014), 2 different boundary-crossing decision-making models, and a placebo. Although participants rated all resources except the placebo as moderately helpful, these resources had little to no influence on their ethical decision-making. Only 47% of students in the 2 ethical decision-making model groups reported they would use the model they were exposed to in the future when contemplating boundary crossings</p>","PeriodicalId":56157,"journal":{"name":"Counseling and Values","volume":"64 1","pages":"53-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cvj.12094","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Students' Ethical Decision-Making When Considering Boundary Crossings With Counselor Educators\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie T. Burns\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cvj.12094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Counselor education students (<i>N</i> = 224) rated 16 boundary-crossing scenarios involving counselor educators. They viewed boundary crossings as unethical and were aware of power differentials between the 2 groups. Next, they rated the scenarios again, after reviewing 1 of 4 ethical informational resources: relevant standards in the <i>ACA Code of Ethics</i> (American Counseling Association, 2014), 2 different boundary-crossing decision-making models, and a placebo. Although participants rated all resources except the placebo as moderately helpful, these resources had little to no influence on their ethical decision-making. Only 47% of students in the 2 ethical decision-making model groups reported they would use the model they were exposed to in the future when contemplating boundary crossings</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counseling and Values\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"53-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cvj.12094\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counseling and Values\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cvj.12094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counseling and Values","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cvj.12094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Students' Ethical Decision-Making When Considering Boundary Crossings With Counselor Educators
Counselor education students (N = 224) rated 16 boundary-crossing scenarios involving counselor educators. They viewed boundary crossings as unethical and were aware of power differentials between the 2 groups. Next, they rated the scenarios again, after reviewing 1 of 4 ethical informational resources: relevant standards in the ACA Code of Ethics (American Counseling Association, 2014), 2 different boundary-crossing decision-making models, and a placebo. Although participants rated all resources except the placebo as moderately helpful, these resources had little to no influence on their ethical decision-making. Only 47% of students in the 2 ethical decision-making model groups reported they would use the model they were exposed to in the future when contemplating boundary crossings