以惯常的方式敲门:锚定文化中的询问、审问和对建议的渴望

IF 0.2 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures Pub Date : 2018-07-10 DOI:10.5325/JMEDIRELICULT.44.2.0148
Joshua S. Easterling
{"title":"以惯常的方式敲门:锚定文化中的询问、审问和对建议的渴望","authors":"Joshua S. Easterling","doi":"10.5325/JMEDIRELICULT.44.2.0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article examines the culture of inquiry as it shaped the lives, communities, and ultimately the reputations of anchorites in the later Middle Ages. It argues that the questions and requests that were presented to anchorites existed within, and were powerfully shaped by, a culture of gossip. Indeed, gossip networks and the questions that were posed by anchorites’ visitors mutually shaped each other. They did so to such an extent that anchorites and their supporters exploited this culture of inquiry—though questions remained elusive in their meaning and intentions—as a way of continually reactivating the culture of gossip that attached to anchorites. At the same time, the regulatory injunction against excessive speech here served its function admirably, since anchorites were often imperiled by the very questions through which a reputation for holy and prophetic counsel was generated. The argument draws its evidence largely from regulatory and hagiographic witnesses.","PeriodicalId":40395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures","volume":"44 1","pages":"148 - 169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knocking in the Usual Manner: Inquiries, Interrogations, and the Desire for Advice in Anchoritic Culture\",\"authors\":\"Joshua S. Easterling\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/JMEDIRELICULT.44.2.0148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This article examines the culture of inquiry as it shaped the lives, communities, and ultimately the reputations of anchorites in the later Middle Ages. It argues that the questions and requests that were presented to anchorites existed within, and were powerfully shaped by, a culture of gossip. Indeed, gossip networks and the questions that were posed by anchorites’ visitors mutually shaped each other. They did so to such an extent that anchorites and their supporters exploited this culture of inquiry—though questions remained elusive in their meaning and intentions—as a way of continually reactivating the culture of gossip that attached to anchorites. At the same time, the regulatory injunction against excessive speech here served its function admirably, since anchorites were often imperiled by the very questions through which a reputation for holy and prophetic counsel was generated. The argument draws its evidence largely from regulatory and hagiographic witnesses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"148 - 169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/JMEDIRELICULT.44.2.0148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JMEDIRELICULT.44.2.0148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文考察了中世纪后期探究文化对女主持人的生活、社区以及最终声誉的影响。它认为,向主持人提出的问题和要求存在于八卦文化中,并受到八卦文化的有力影响。事实上,八卦网络和主播来访者提出的问题相互影响。他们这样做的程度如此之大,以至于主播及其支持者利用了这种调查文化——尽管问题的含义和意图仍然难以捉摸——作为一种不断激活主播八卦文化的方式。与此同时,禁止过度言论的监管禁令在这里发挥了令人钦佩的作用,因为主持人经常受到问题的威胁,而正是这些问题产生了神圣和预言性顾问的声誉。这场争论的证据主要来自监管和圣徒传记证人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knocking in the Usual Manner: Inquiries, Interrogations, and the Desire for Advice in Anchoritic Culture
abstract:This article examines the culture of inquiry as it shaped the lives, communities, and ultimately the reputations of anchorites in the later Middle Ages. It argues that the questions and requests that were presented to anchorites existed within, and were powerfully shaped by, a culture of gossip. Indeed, gossip networks and the questions that were posed by anchorites’ visitors mutually shaped each other. They did so to such an extent that anchorites and their supporters exploited this culture of inquiry—though questions remained elusive in their meaning and intentions—as a way of continually reactivating the culture of gossip that attached to anchorites. At the same time, the regulatory injunction against excessive speech here served its function admirably, since anchorites were often imperiled by the very questions through which a reputation for holy and prophetic counsel was generated. The argument draws its evidence largely from regulatory and hagiographic witnesses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures
Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Translating Christ in the Middle Ages: Gender, Authorship, and the Visionary Text by Barbara Zimbalist (review) Encountering The Book of Margery Kempe The Fifteen Oes and Other Prayers: Edited from the Text Published by William Caxton (1491) ed. by Alexandra Barratt and Susan Powell (review) "Sowe ye yt together as ye may": Textile Images as Meditational Stimuli in Fifteenth-Century English Bridgettine Writings The Rood in Medieval Britain and Ireland, c.800–c.1500
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1