特许经营商在瓦拉拉巴的石油水平

RechtIdee Pub Date : 2020-12-21 DOI:10.21107/RI.V15I2.7772
DwiLinda Astutik
{"title":"特许经营商在瓦拉拉巴的石油水平","authors":"DwiLinda Astutik","doi":"10.21107/RI.V15I2.7772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problems that often occur in practice of franchise agreements in Indonesia wich is often the franchise receiver and franchise giver in conducting cooperation agreements do not involve the role of a notary public in making the agreement so that the form of the agreement made is only an underhand agreement, it is very detrimental and creates risks if one party violates the agreement that has been agreed upon. The agreement made by both parties is no exception the franchise agreement which is made is only a limited agreement under the hand so that the protection of the rights of each party in the franchise agreement, especially the franchisee is not enough to protect the rights attached to him, because agreements made only under the hands of the strength of proof are not perfect, unlike agreements made authentically before a notary whose proof of strength is perfect. Therefore, in practice there are still many franchisees whose are harmed by the franchise agreement agreed upon with the franchisor. This research is normative using the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The source of legal material in this study uses primary legal material sources supported by secondary legal materials and uses legal material collection techniques through library research, the analysis in this study uses content analysis and systematic interpretation. The results showed that legal protection in franchising activities (Franchise) is regulated in Government Regulation Number 42 of 2007 concerning Franchising. The form of this cooperation agreement is outlined in the form of a written agreement that contains several standard and additional clauses that have been discussed previously between the two parties. , this is what limits the franchisee by stating that after the termination of the agreement, the franchisee is limited to not doing business in a similar business to the previous franchise business that has been undertaken for a certain period. To protect the rights of the franchisee, the franchise agreement agreed upon must be in the form of a notary deed (authentic). It aims to ensure justice sbetween the parties and legal certainty of the contents of the franchise agreement more secure.","PeriodicalId":31500,"journal":{"name":"RechtIdee","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP FRANCHISEE YANG DI RUGIKAN OLEH FRANCHISOR DALAM PERJANJIAN WARALABA\",\"authors\":\"DwiLinda Astutik\",\"doi\":\"10.21107/RI.V15I2.7772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Problems that often occur in practice of franchise agreements in Indonesia wich is often the franchise receiver and franchise giver in conducting cooperation agreements do not involve the role of a notary public in making the agreement so that the form of the agreement made is only an underhand agreement, it is very detrimental and creates risks if one party violates the agreement that has been agreed upon. The agreement made by both parties is no exception the franchise agreement which is made is only a limited agreement under the hand so that the protection of the rights of each party in the franchise agreement, especially the franchisee is not enough to protect the rights attached to him, because agreements made only under the hands of the strength of proof are not perfect, unlike agreements made authentically before a notary whose proof of strength is perfect. Therefore, in practice there are still many franchisees whose are harmed by the franchise agreement agreed upon with the franchisor. This research is normative using the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The source of legal material in this study uses primary legal material sources supported by secondary legal materials and uses legal material collection techniques through library research, the analysis in this study uses content analysis and systematic interpretation. The results showed that legal protection in franchising activities (Franchise) is regulated in Government Regulation Number 42 of 2007 concerning Franchising. The form of this cooperation agreement is outlined in the form of a written agreement that contains several standard and additional clauses that have been discussed previously between the two parties. , this is what limits the franchisee by stating that after the termination of the agreement, the franchisee is limited to not doing business in a similar business to the previous franchise business that has been undertaken for a certain period. To protect the rights of the franchisee, the franchise agreement agreed upon must be in the form of a notary deed (authentic). It aims to ensure justice sbetween the parties and legal certainty of the contents of the franchise agreement more secure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RechtIdee\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RechtIdee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21107/RI.V15I2.7772\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RechtIdee","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21107/RI.V15I2.7772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在印度尼西亚的特许经营协议实践中经常出现的问题是,特许经营接管人和特许经营授予人在签订合作协议时往往不涉及公证人的角色,因此签订的协议形式只是一种秘密协议,如果一方违反了已经达成的协议,这是非常有害的,并会产生风险。双方签订的协议也不例外,签订的特许经营协议只是一份有限的协议,因此对特许经营协议中各方权利的保护,特别是对被特许人的权利的保护不足以保护他所享有的权利,因为只有在有证据的情况下签订的协议并不完美,与在公证人面前真实订立的协议不同,公证人的实力证明是完美的。因此,在实践中,仍有许多被特许人因与特许人达成的特许经营协议而受到损害。本研究采用法定方法和概念方法进行规范性研究。本研究的法律材料来源采用了以次要法律材料为支撑的主要法律材料来源,并通过图书馆研究采用了法律材料收集技术,本研究的分析采用了内容分析和系统解释。结果表明,特许经营活动(特许经营)中的法律保护受2007年第42号政府特许经营条例的规定。本合作协议的形式以书面协议的形式概述,其中包含双方之前讨论过的几个标准条款和附加条款,这是对特许经营商的限制,规定在协议终止后,特许经营商在一定时期内不得从事与先前特许经营业务类似的业务。为了保护被特许人的权利,双方同意的特许经营协议必须以公证书的形式(真实)。其目的是确保各方之间的公正性和特许经营协议内容的法律确定性更加安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP FRANCHISEE YANG DI RUGIKAN OLEH FRANCHISOR DALAM PERJANJIAN WARALABA
Problems that often occur in practice of franchise agreements in Indonesia wich is often the franchise receiver and franchise giver in conducting cooperation agreements do not involve the role of a notary public in making the agreement so that the form of the agreement made is only an underhand agreement, it is very detrimental and creates risks if one party violates the agreement that has been agreed upon. The agreement made by both parties is no exception the franchise agreement which is made is only a limited agreement under the hand so that the protection of the rights of each party in the franchise agreement, especially the franchisee is not enough to protect the rights attached to him, because agreements made only under the hands of the strength of proof are not perfect, unlike agreements made authentically before a notary whose proof of strength is perfect. Therefore, in practice there are still many franchisees whose are harmed by the franchise agreement agreed upon with the franchisor. This research is normative using the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The source of legal material in this study uses primary legal material sources supported by secondary legal materials and uses legal material collection techniques through library research, the analysis in this study uses content analysis and systematic interpretation. The results showed that legal protection in franchising activities (Franchise) is regulated in Government Regulation Number 42 of 2007 concerning Franchising. The form of this cooperation agreement is outlined in the form of a written agreement that contains several standard and additional clauses that have been discussed previously between the two parties. , this is what limits the franchisee by stating that after the termination of the agreement, the franchisee is limited to not doing business in a similar business to the previous franchise business that has been undertaken for a certain period. To protect the rights of the franchisee, the franchise agreement agreed upon must be in the form of a notary deed (authentic). It aims to ensure justice sbetween the parties and legal certainty of the contents of the franchise agreement more secure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
PEMENUHAN HAK ATAS PELAYANAN KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT VIA PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA VAKSIN COVID-19 BERBAYAR PENERAPAN ARM’S LENGTH PRINCIPLE DALAM PRAKTEK ABUSE OF TRANSFER PRICING PERUSAHAAN MULTINASIONAL DI INDONESIA UPAYA MEMINIMALISIR TRANSFER PRICING PADA HUKUM PERPAJAKAN INTERNASIONAL KEABSAHAN KEUNTUNGAN (MARGIN) PADA AKAD MURABAHAH DENGAN SISTEM BA’I AL-WAFA’ REKONSEPSI MAKNA PENGANCAMAN KEKERASAN ATAU MENAKUT-NAKUTI DALAM UU ITE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1