这不公平!申请人对个人和专业社交媒体筛选的反应相似吗?

IF 2.9 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Human Performance Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1080/08959285.2022.2110104
Natalie Armenteros, Aniqa Hatem, Laura M. Heron, C. Viswesvaran
{"title":"这不公平!申请人对个人和专业社交媒体筛选的反应相似吗?","authors":"Natalie Armenteros, Aniqa Hatem, Laura M. Heron, C. Viswesvaran","doi":"10.1080/08959285.2022.2110104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The use of social media in selection processes to gather information about job candidates is a heavily debated and controversial topic. However, research that focuses on whether applicant reactions differ when social networking sites (SNSs) are screened is limited. This study used a quasi-experimental design to examine perceptions of face validity, predictive validity, and test fairness when personal (Facebook or Twitter) versus professional (LinkedIn) profiles are screened. The moderating role of self-monitoring was also explored. Findings demonstrated that applicants react negatively to screenings involving personal SNSs. High self-monitors had favorable face validity and predictive validity reactions to a professional SNS screening, but the opposite effect was found for personal SNSs. Practical implications for organizations and future directions for research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47825,"journal":{"name":"Human Performance","volume":"35 1","pages":"241 - 260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"It’s Not Fair! Are Applicant Reactions to Personal and Professional Social Media Screenings Similar?\",\"authors\":\"Natalie Armenteros, Aniqa Hatem, Laura M. Heron, C. Viswesvaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08959285.2022.2110104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The use of social media in selection processes to gather information about job candidates is a heavily debated and controversial topic. However, research that focuses on whether applicant reactions differ when social networking sites (SNSs) are screened is limited. This study used a quasi-experimental design to examine perceptions of face validity, predictive validity, and test fairness when personal (Facebook or Twitter) versus professional (LinkedIn) profiles are screened. The moderating role of self-monitoring was also explored. Findings demonstrated that applicants react negatively to screenings involving personal SNSs. High self-monitors had favorable face validity and predictive validity reactions to a professional SNS screening, but the opposite effect was found for personal SNSs. Practical implications for organizations and future directions for research are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Performance\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"241 - 260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2022.2110104\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2022.2110104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在选拔过程中使用社交媒体来收集求职者的信息是一个备受争议的话题。然而,关注申请人在筛选社交网站时反应是否不同的研究有限。这项研究使用了一种准实验设计,在筛选个人(脸书或推特)和专业(领英)档案时,考察了对人脸有效性、预测有效性和测试公平性的看法。还探讨了自我监督的调节作用。调查结果表明,申请人对涉及个人社交网络的筛选反应消极。高自我监控对专业SNS筛查有良好的面部有效性和预测有效性反应,但对个人SNS却有相反的效果。讨论了对组织的实际意义和未来研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
It’s Not Fair! Are Applicant Reactions to Personal and Professional Social Media Screenings Similar?
ABSTRACT The use of social media in selection processes to gather information about job candidates is a heavily debated and controversial topic. However, research that focuses on whether applicant reactions differ when social networking sites (SNSs) are screened is limited. This study used a quasi-experimental design to examine perceptions of face validity, predictive validity, and test fairness when personal (Facebook or Twitter) versus professional (LinkedIn) profiles are screened. The moderating role of self-monitoring was also explored. Findings demonstrated that applicants react negatively to screenings involving personal SNSs. High self-monitors had favorable face validity and predictive validity reactions to a professional SNS screening, but the opposite effect was found for personal SNSs. Practical implications for organizations and future directions for research are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Performance
Human Performance PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Human Performance publishes research investigating the nature and role of performance in the workplace and in organizational settings and offers a rich variety of information going beyond the study of traditional job behavior. Dedicated to presenting original research, theory, and measurement methods, the journal investigates individual, team, and firm level performance factors that influence work and organizational effectiveness. Human Performance is a respected forum for behavioral scientists interested in variables that motivate and promote high-level human performance, particularly in organizational and occupational settings. The journal seeks to identify and stimulate relevant research, communication, and theory concerning human capabilities and effectiveness. It serves as a valuable intellectual link between such disciplines as industrial-organizational psychology, individual differences, work physiology, organizational behavior, human resource management, and human factors.
期刊最新文献
The Normative Judgment Test of Honesty-Humility: An Implicit Instrument for Organizational Contexts Mechanisms Underlying the Use of Power-Creativity Relationship in the Military: Achievement Motivation and Identification Authentic Leadership’s Impact on Follower Psychological Capital and Performance Through Organizational Identification and Role Clarity Doing Good to Be (Subtly) Bad: A Moral Licensing View on the Relations Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Instigated Incivility Toxic Triads: Supervisor Characteristics, Subordinate Self-Esteem, and Supervisor Stressors in Relation to Perceptions of Abusive Supervision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1