公司质量和股票回报:来自印度的证据

IF 1.2 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Investment Analysts Journal Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/10293523.2021.1991130
S. Sehgal, Asheesh Pandey
{"title":"公司质量和股票回报:来自印度的证据","authors":"S. Sehgal, Asheesh Pandey","doi":"10.1080/10293523.2021.1991130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Using data for 1 848 companies, we find that quality increases, not quality, drive stock returns in India. Profitability and safety seem to be relevant attributes for measuring quality. Our cross-sectional tests show that the role of quality in predicting returns is partially subsumed by momentum in short holding periods. Rational sources are not able to explain quality premiums. We find that quality premiums result from investor overreaction. At the same time, momentum profits are an outcome of investor underreaction, suggesting that investors pay more attention to fundamentals than past price trends. High investments by institutional investing may account for such behaviour.","PeriodicalId":44496,"journal":{"name":"Investment Analysts Journal","volume":"50 1","pages":"189 - 208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Firm quality and stock returns: Evidence from India\",\"authors\":\"S. Sehgal, Asheesh Pandey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10293523.2021.1991130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Using data for 1 848 companies, we find that quality increases, not quality, drive stock returns in India. Profitability and safety seem to be relevant attributes for measuring quality. Our cross-sectional tests show that the role of quality in predicting returns is partially subsumed by momentum in short holding periods. Rational sources are not able to explain quality premiums. We find that quality premiums result from investor overreaction. At the same time, momentum profits are an outcome of investor underreaction, suggesting that investors pay more attention to fundamentals than past price trends. High investments by institutional investing may account for such behaviour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investment Analysts Journal\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"189 - 208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investment Analysts Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2021.1991130\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investment Analysts Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2021.1991130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

通过对1848家公司的数据分析,我们发现驱动印度股票收益的不是质量而是质量的提高。盈利能力和安全性似乎是衡量质量的相关属性。我们的横断面测试表明,质量在预测收益中的作用部分被短期持有期的动量所包含。理性来源不能解释质量溢价。我们发现,质量溢价源于投资者的过度反应。与此同时,动量利润是投资者反应不足的结果,这表明投资者更关注基本面,而不是过去的价格趋势。机构投资的高额投资可能是造成这种行为的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Firm quality and stock returns: Evidence from India
ABSTRACT Using data for 1 848 companies, we find that quality increases, not quality, drive stock returns in India. Profitability and safety seem to be relevant attributes for measuring quality. Our cross-sectional tests show that the role of quality in predicting returns is partially subsumed by momentum in short holding periods. Rational sources are not able to explain quality premiums. We find that quality premiums result from investor overreaction. At the same time, momentum profits are an outcome of investor underreaction, suggesting that investors pay more attention to fundamentals than past price trends. High investments by institutional investing may account for such behaviour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investment Analysts Journal
Investment Analysts Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Investment Analysts Journal is an international, peer-reviewed journal, publishing high-quality, original research three times a year. The journal publishes significant new research in finance and investments and seeks to establish a balance between theoretical and empirical studies. Papers written in any areas of finance, investment, accounting and economics will be considered for publication. All contributions are welcome but are subject to an objective selection procedure to ensure that published articles answer the criteria of scientific objectivity, importance and replicability. Readability and good writing style are important. No articles which have been published or are under review elsewhere will be considered. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is double blind and submission is via email. Accepted papers will then pass through originality checking software. The editors reserve the right to make the final decision with respect to publication.
期刊最新文献
Employing behavioural portfolio theory for sustainable investment: Examining drawdown risks and ESG factors The spillover and leverage effects and trading volume of FinTech Exchange-Traded Funds Risk spillovers among global oil & gas firms The time-frequency-quantile causal impact of Cable News-based Economic Policy Uncertainty on major assets returns Momentum trading: How it differs among investor segments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1