Maciej Szewczyk, C. Nowak, P. Hulva, J. Mergeay, A. V. Stronen, B. Bolfíková, Sylwia D. Czarnomska, T. A. Diserens, V. Fenchuk, M. Figura, A. Groot, Andżelika Haidt, M. M. Hansen, H. Jansman, Gesa Kluth, I. Kwiatkowska, K. Lubińska, J. Michaux, Natalia Niedźwiecka, S. Nowak, K. Olsen, I. Reinhardt, M. Romański, L. Schley, Steve Smith, R. Špinkytė-Bačkaitienė, P. Stachyra, K. Stępniak, P. Sunde, P. F. Thomsen, T. Zwijacz-Kozica, R. Mysłajek
{"title":"对中欧狼种群目前离散保护单位的基因支持","authors":"Maciej Szewczyk, C. Nowak, P. Hulva, J. Mergeay, A. V. Stronen, B. Bolfíková, Sylwia D. Czarnomska, T. A. Diserens, V. Fenchuk, M. Figura, A. Groot, Andżelika Haidt, M. M. Hansen, H. Jansman, Gesa Kluth, I. Kwiatkowska, K. Lubińska, J. Michaux, Natalia Niedźwiecka, S. Nowak, K. Olsen, I. Reinhardt, M. Romański, L. Schley, Steve Smith, R. Špinkytė-Bačkaitienė, P. Stachyra, K. Stępniak, P. Sunde, P. F. Thomsen, T. Zwijacz-Kozica, R. Mysłajek","doi":"10.2981/wlb.00809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The gray wolf Canis lupus range in central Europe is dynamically expanding, reconnecting previously isolated populations. Thus, a recent paper has proposed to merge the current Baltic and Central European (CE) wolf management units, which are no longer isolated by distance. However, recent genetic findings indicate that these two populations are not genetically homogenous. Here we review the most recent data on wolf genetic structure in central Europe and show that even though the CE and Baltic wolves represent the same phylogeographic lineage, their demographic history has resulted in significant genetic structure between these two populations. While the groups are interconnected by moderate gene flow, it is not high enough to reduce the strong founder signal observed in the CE population, suggesting that population dynamics within the CE wolf range are largely independent from those of its source (Baltic) population. Consequently, a management unit combining the CE and Baltic wolves would not form a demographically coherent entity. Thus, we recommend that conservation management units maintain their separate status.","PeriodicalId":54405,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Biology","volume":"2021 1","pages":"wlb.00809"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic support for the current discrete conservation unit of the Central European wolf population\",\"authors\":\"Maciej Szewczyk, C. Nowak, P. Hulva, J. Mergeay, A. V. Stronen, B. Bolfíková, Sylwia D. Czarnomska, T. A. Diserens, V. Fenchuk, M. Figura, A. Groot, Andżelika Haidt, M. M. Hansen, H. Jansman, Gesa Kluth, I. Kwiatkowska, K. Lubińska, J. Michaux, Natalia Niedźwiecka, S. Nowak, K. Olsen, I. Reinhardt, M. Romański, L. Schley, Steve Smith, R. Špinkytė-Bačkaitienė, P. Stachyra, K. Stępniak, P. Sunde, P. F. Thomsen, T. Zwijacz-Kozica, R. Mysłajek\",\"doi\":\"10.2981/wlb.00809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The gray wolf Canis lupus range in central Europe is dynamically expanding, reconnecting previously isolated populations. Thus, a recent paper has proposed to merge the current Baltic and Central European (CE) wolf management units, which are no longer isolated by distance. However, recent genetic findings indicate that these two populations are not genetically homogenous. Here we review the most recent data on wolf genetic structure in central Europe and show that even though the CE and Baltic wolves represent the same phylogeographic lineage, their demographic history has resulted in significant genetic structure between these two populations. While the groups are interconnected by moderate gene flow, it is not high enough to reduce the strong founder signal observed in the CE population, suggesting that population dynamics within the CE wolf range are largely independent from those of its source (Baltic) population. Consequently, a management unit combining the CE and Baltic wolves would not form a demographically coherent entity. Thus, we recommend that conservation management units maintain their separate status.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wildlife Biology\",\"volume\":\"2021 1\",\"pages\":\"wlb.00809\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wildlife Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00809\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00809","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genetic support for the current discrete conservation unit of the Central European wolf population
The gray wolf Canis lupus range in central Europe is dynamically expanding, reconnecting previously isolated populations. Thus, a recent paper has proposed to merge the current Baltic and Central European (CE) wolf management units, which are no longer isolated by distance. However, recent genetic findings indicate that these two populations are not genetically homogenous. Here we review the most recent data on wolf genetic structure in central Europe and show that even though the CE and Baltic wolves represent the same phylogeographic lineage, their demographic history has resulted in significant genetic structure between these two populations. While the groups are interconnected by moderate gene flow, it is not high enough to reduce the strong founder signal observed in the CE population, suggesting that population dynamics within the CE wolf range are largely independent from those of its source (Baltic) population. Consequently, a management unit combining the CE and Baltic wolves would not form a demographically coherent entity. Thus, we recommend that conservation management units maintain their separate status.
期刊介绍:
WILDLIFE BIOLOGY is a high-quality scientific forum directing concise and up-to-date information to scientists, administrators, wildlife managers and conservationists. The journal encourages and welcomes original papers, short communications and reviews written in English from throughout the world. The journal accepts theoretical, empirical, and practical articles of high standard from all areas of wildlife science with the primary task of creating the scientific basis for the enhancement of wildlife management practices. Our concept of ''wildlife'' mainly includes mammal and bird species, but studies on other species or phenomena relevant to wildlife management are also of great interest. We adopt a broad concept of wildlife management, including all structures and actions with the purpose of conservation, sustainable use, and/or control of wildlife and its habitats, in order to safeguard sustainable relationships between wildlife and other human interests.