加纳北部农民富拉尼牧民冲突:综合景观方法是前进的道路吗?

IF 1.1 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Forests, Trees and Livelihoods Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/14728028.2023.2199367
E. Bayala, M. Ros-Tonen, T. Sunderland, H. Djoudi, J. Reed
{"title":"加纳北部农民富拉尼牧民冲突:综合景观方法是前进的道路吗?","authors":"E. Bayala, M. Ros-Tonen, T. Sunderland, H. Djoudi, J. Reed","doi":"10.1080/14728028.2023.2199367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Over the past 20 years, recurrent and violent conflicts between farmers and Fulani pastoralists have persisted in Northern Ghana. These conflicts mainly revolve around access to and utilisation of natural resources such as land and water. Conflicts of interest have led to the social marginalisation of the Fulani community, leading to their exclusion from formal landscape governance processes. This paper explores the prospects for better management of these conflicts and the potential for including Fulani pastoralists in landscape governance through the implementation of integrated landscape approaches. Based on a semi-systematic literature review and key informant interviews, we propose a categorisation of conflicts and potential causes and solutions. The experience of Burkina Faso in managing farmer-herder conflicts is presented to inform lessons for Ghana. We argue that adopting more inclusive landscape approaches, with a particular emphaisis on key principles, could contribute to reconciling diverging interests between farming and herding communities and help mitigate conflicts. This requires that constraints such as the negative and pervasive perceptions towards the Fulani, the neglect of pastoral activity in broader development processes, and the lack of inclusion of Fulani pastoralists in multi-stakeholder platforms and decision-making need to be urgently addressed.","PeriodicalId":12422,"journal":{"name":"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods","volume":"32 1","pages":"63 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Farmer-Fulani pastoralist conflicts in Northern Ghana: are integrated landscape approaches the way forward?\",\"authors\":\"E. Bayala, M. Ros-Tonen, T. Sunderland, H. Djoudi, J. Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14728028.2023.2199367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Over the past 20 years, recurrent and violent conflicts between farmers and Fulani pastoralists have persisted in Northern Ghana. These conflicts mainly revolve around access to and utilisation of natural resources such as land and water. Conflicts of interest have led to the social marginalisation of the Fulani community, leading to their exclusion from formal landscape governance processes. This paper explores the prospects for better management of these conflicts and the potential for including Fulani pastoralists in landscape governance through the implementation of integrated landscape approaches. Based on a semi-systematic literature review and key informant interviews, we propose a categorisation of conflicts and potential causes and solutions. The experience of Burkina Faso in managing farmer-herder conflicts is presented to inform lessons for Ghana. We argue that adopting more inclusive landscape approaches, with a particular emphaisis on key principles, could contribute to reconciling diverging interests between farming and herding communities and help mitigate conflicts. This requires that constraints such as the negative and pervasive perceptions towards the Fulani, the neglect of pastoral activity in broader development processes, and the lack of inclusion of Fulani pastoralists in multi-stakeholder platforms and decision-making need to be urgently addressed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"63 - 89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2023.2199367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2023.2199367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的20年里,加纳北部农民和富拉尼牧民之间反复发生的暴力冲突持续不断。这些冲突主要围绕着土地和水等自然资源的获取和利用。利益冲突导致富拉尼社区的社会边缘化,导致他们被排除在正式的景观治理进程之外。本文探讨了更好地管理这些冲突的前景,以及通过实施综合景观方法将富拉尼牧民纳入景观治理的潜力。基于半系统的文献综述和关键线人访谈,我们提出了冲突的分类和潜在的原因和解决方案。布基纳法索在管理农牧民冲突方面的经验可供加纳借鉴。我们认为,采用更具包容性的景观方法,特别强调关键原则,可能有助于调和农牧社区之间的利益分歧,并有助于缓解冲突。这就要求迫切解决诸如对富拉尼人普遍存在的负面看法、在更广泛的发展进程中忽视牧民活动、以及富拉尼牧民缺乏参与多利益攸关方平台和决策等制约因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Farmer-Fulani pastoralist conflicts in Northern Ghana: are integrated landscape approaches the way forward?
ABSTRACT Over the past 20 years, recurrent and violent conflicts between farmers and Fulani pastoralists have persisted in Northern Ghana. These conflicts mainly revolve around access to and utilisation of natural resources such as land and water. Conflicts of interest have led to the social marginalisation of the Fulani community, leading to their exclusion from formal landscape governance processes. This paper explores the prospects for better management of these conflicts and the potential for including Fulani pastoralists in landscape governance through the implementation of integrated landscape approaches. Based on a semi-systematic literature review and key informant interviews, we propose a categorisation of conflicts and potential causes and solutions. The experience of Burkina Faso in managing farmer-herder conflicts is presented to inform lessons for Ghana. We argue that adopting more inclusive landscape approaches, with a particular emphaisis on key principles, could contribute to reconciling diverging interests between farming and herding communities and help mitigate conflicts. This requires that constraints such as the negative and pervasive perceptions towards the Fulani, the neglect of pastoral activity in broader development processes, and the lack of inclusion of Fulani pastoralists in multi-stakeholder platforms and decision-making need to be urgently addressed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forests, Trees and Livelihoods
Forests, Trees and Livelihoods Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Forests, Trees and Livelihoods originated in 1979 under the name of the International Tree Crops Journal and adopted its new name in 2001 in order to reflect its emphasis on the diversity of tree based systems within the field of rural development. It is a peer-reviewed international journal publishing comments, reviews, case studies, research methodologies and research findings and articles on policies in this general field in order to promote discussion, debate and the exchange of information and views in the main subject areas of.
期刊最新文献
Perception of agroforestry practices and factors influencing adoption among shifting cultivators in Tripura, India Livelihood benefits and challenges of Acacia decurrens -based agroforestry system in Awi Zone highlands, Northwest Ethiopia The role of learning sources in familiarity with conservation programs: the gendered case of family forest landowners in Georgia, United States Influence of a plant growth booster on the growth and quality parameters of Juniperus polycarpos seedlings under nursery conditions Ailanthus excelsa Roxb. in India: A multipurpose “tree of Heaven” for semi-arid regions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1