饲养制度如何影响圈养非洲狮的行为和活动

IF 0.7 Q4 ZOOLOGY Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research Pub Date : 2019-07-28 DOI:10.19227/JZAR.V7I3.392
Nina Hottges, Madeleine Hjelm, Therese Hård, M. Laska
{"title":"饲养制度如何影响圈养非洲狮的行为和活动","authors":"Nina Hottges, Madeleine Hjelm, Therese Hård, M. Laska","doi":"10.19227/JZAR.V7I3.392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lions (Panthera leo) are popular zoo animals and obligate carnivores. In the past, zoos focused on the nutritional aspect of feeding, whereas today they aim to encourage naturalistic feeding. AZA’s Lion Care Manual recommends a frequent feeding schedule, while other sources highlight the benefits of unpredictable, infrequent feeding schedules. Further, the husbandry guidelines for lions by EAZA propose to feed lions separately. To assess how lions are affected by feeding frequency, we collected data on five behaviour categories (social, agonistic, exploratory, marking, maintenance) and four activity categories (inactive, active, feed, pace) of four captive lion prides held on either high frequency (HF) or low frequency feeding (LF). We found that some behaviour categories (agonistic, exploratory and marking) and one activity (feeding) were more frequent for lions on HF feeding. Lions on both feeding regimes engaged more often in agonistic behaviour and were more inactive on feeding days than fasting days. On fasting days, activity and pacing as well as exploratory, maintenance, marking and social behaviour were more frequent than on feeding days. During the consecutive fasting days the lions on LF feeding were increasingly active. The results show that LF feeding with whole carcasses allowed the prides to resolve social discrepancies during feeding, which reduced aggression between feedings. LF feeding resulted in satiety of the lions to the extent of altered behaviour during feeding day and the first fasting day, whereas lions on HF feeding showed unvarying behaviour during feeding and fasting days suggesting a lack of satiety.","PeriodicalId":56160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"117-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does feeding regime affect behaviour and activity in captive African lions (Panthera leo)\",\"authors\":\"Nina Hottges, Madeleine Hjelm, Therese Hård, M. Laska\",\"doi\":\"10.19227/JZAR.V7I3.392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lions (Panthera leo) are popular zoo animals and obligate carnivores. In the past, zoos focused on the nutritional aspect of feeding, whereas today they aim to encourage naturalistic feeding. AZA’s Lion Care Manual recommends a frequent feeding schedule, while other sources highlight the benefits of unpredictable, infrequent feeding schedules. Further, the husbandry guidelines for lions by EAZA propose to feed lions separately. To assess how lions are affected by feeding frequency, we collected data on five behaviour categories (social, agonistic, exploratory, marking, maintenance) and four activity categories (inactive, active, feed, pace) of four captive lion prides held on either high frequency (HF) or low frequency feeding (LF). We found that some behaviour categories (agonistic, exploratory and marking) and one activity (feeding) were more frequent for lions on HF feeding. Lions on both feeding regimes engaged more often in agonistic behaviour and were more inactive on feeding days than fasting days. On fasting days, activity and pacing as well as exploratory, maintenance, marking and social behaviour were more frequent than on feeding days. During the consecutive fasting days the lions on LF feeding were increasingly active. The results show that LF feeding with whole carcasses allowed the prides to resolve social discrepancies during feeding, which reduced aggression between feedings. LF feeding resulted in satiety of the lions to the extent of altered behaviour during feeding day and the first fasting day, whereas lions on HF feeding showed unvarying behaviour during feeding and fasting days suggesting a lack of satiety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"117-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19227/JZAR.V7I3.392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19227/JZAR.V7I3.392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

狮子(Panthera leo)是受欢迎的动物园动物和义务食肉动物。过去,动物园专注于喂养的营养方面,而今天他们的目标是鼓励自然喂养。AZA的狮子护理手册建议经常喂食,而其他来源则强调了不可预测、不频繁喂食的好处。此外,EAZA的狮子饲养指南建议单独喂养狮子。为了评估狮子是如何受到喂食频率的影响的,我们收集了四只圈养狮子的五种行为类别(社交、痛苦、探索、标记、维持)和四种活动类别(不活跃、活跃、进食、步伐)的数据,这些狮子以高频(HF)或低频(LF)喂食。我们发现,HF喂养的狮子的一些行为类别(痛苦、探索和标记)和一种活动(喂养)更频繁。两种喂养方式下的狮子更经常表现出痛苦的行为,在喂养日比禁食日更不活跃。在禁食日,活动和起搏以及探索、维持、标记和社交行为比喂食日更频繁。在连续禁食的日子里,喂食LF的狮子越来越活跃。结果表明,用整只尸体进行LF喂养可以让骄傲犬解决喂养过程中的社会差异,从而减少了喂养之间的攻击性。LF喂养导致狮子的饱腹感,在喂养日和第一个禁食日的行为发生了一定程度的改变,而HF喂养的狮子在喂养和禁食日表现出不变的行为,这表明狮子缺乏饱腹感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How does feeding regime affect behaviour and activity in captive African lions (Panthera leo)
Lions (Panthera leo) are popular zoo animals and obligate carnivores. In the past, zoos focused on the nutritional aspect of feeding, whereas today they aim to encourage naturalistic feeding. AZA’s Lion Care Manual recommends a frequent feeding schedule, while other sources highlight the benefits of unpredictable, infrequent feeding schedules. Further, the husbandry guidelines for lions by EAZA propose to feed lions separately. To assess how lions are affected by feeding frequency, we collected data on five behaviour categories (social, agonistic, exploratory, marking, maintenance) and four activity categories (inactive, active, feed, pace) of four captive lion prides held on either high frequency (HF) or low frequency feeding (LF). We found that some behaviour categories (agonistic, exploratory and marking) and one activity (feeding) were more frequent for lions on HF feeding. Lions on both feeding regimes engaged more often in agonistic behaviour and were more inactive on feeding days than fasting days. On fasting days, activity and pacing as well as exploratory, maintenance, marking and social behaviour were more frequent than on feeding days. During the consecutive fasting days the lions on LF feeding were increasingly active. The results show that LF feeding with whole carcasses allowed the prides to resolve social discrepancies during feeding, which reduced aggression between feedings. LF feeding resulted in satiety of the lions to the extent of altered behaviour during feeding day and the first fasting day, whereas lions on HF feeding showed unvarying behaviour during feeding and fasting days suggesting a lack of satiety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interest in coloured objects and behavioural budgets of individual captive freshwater turtles Assessing the effects of biosecurity measures in terrarium management Assessing choice ability and preferences of five Leopard Tortoises (Stigmochelys pardalis) for three stimuli through a novel two-phase preference test Artemia as a sustainably cultured live feed for ornamental fish in zoological institutions with immunostimulant properties when bioencapsulated with spirulina (Arthrospria platensis). Enclosure Use as a Measure of Behavioral Welfare in Zoo-Housed African Wild Dogs (Lycaon pictus)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1