失控的陪审团

K. Hogg
{"title":"失控的陪审团","authors":"K. Hogg","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers the impact of out-of-court research by jurors on trial fairness and policies to deter such independent research. Though jurors are barred from considering evidence outside the courtroom, some recent Canadian cases show that independent research occurs nonetheless. Part I of the paper reviews the policy rationales for the ban on juror research. Part II discusses the prevalence of independent research and reviews some recent Canadian cases in which the issue is addressed.  Part III considers solutions to the problem including the approaches taken by the UK and throughout the US. The paper concludes by recommending that Canada act pre-emptively to deter independent juror research before resorting to criminal prosecution of so-called \"runaway jurors.\"","PeriodicalId":40917,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Runaway Jurors\",\"authors\":\"K. Hogg\",\"doi\":\"10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper considers the impact of out-of-court research by jurors on trial fairness and policies to deter such independent research. Though jurors are barred from considering evidence outside the courtroom, some recent Canadian cases show that independent research occurs nonetheless. Part I of the paper reviews the policy rationales for the ban on juror research. Part II discusses the prevalence of independent research and reviews some recent Canadian cases in which the issue is addressed.  Part III considers solutions to the problem including the approaches taken by the UK and throughout the US. The paper concludes by recommending that Canada act pre-emptively to deter independent juror research before resorting to criminal prosecution of so-called \\\"runaway jurors.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":40917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Legal Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考虑了陪审员庭外研究对审判公平性的影响,以及阻止此类独立研究的政策。尽管陪审员被禁止在法庭外考虑证据,但加拿大最近的一些案件表明,尽管如此,仍有独立的研究。论文的第一部分回顾了禁止陪审员研究的政策依据。第二部分讨论了独立研究的普遍性,并回顾了加拿大最近处理这一问题的一些案例。第三部分考虑了这个问题的解决方案,包括英国和整个美国采取的方法。论文最后建议加拿大在对所谓的“失控陪审员”提起刑事诉讼之前,先发制人,阻止独立陪审员的研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Runaway Jurors
This paper considers the impact of out-of-court research by jurors on trial fairness and policies to deter such independent research. Though jurors are barred from considering evidence outside the courtroom, some recent Canadian cases show that independent research occurs nonetheless. Part I of the paper reviews the policy rationales for the ban on juror research. Part II discusses the prevalence of independent research and reviews some recent Canadian cases in which the issue is addressed.  Part III considers solutions to the problem including the approaches taken by the UK and throughout the US. The paper concludes by recommending that Canada act pre-emptively to deter independent juror research before resorting to criminal prosecution of so-called "runaway jurors."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
A New Dawn for Canadian Platform Workers? To Affirm Difference or To Deny Distinction? A New Dawn for Canadian Platform Workers? To Affirm Difference or To Deny Distinction? Deductibility of Surrogacy Payments in Canadian Tax Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1