《高等教育》或《丑闻的成功

Q2 Arts and Humanities Philip Roth Studies Pub Date : 2021-04-13 DOI:10.1353/prs.2021.0005
B. Streeter
{"title":"《高等教育》或《丑闻的成功","authors":"B. Streeter","doi":"10.1353/prs.2021.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Recent studies of Philip Roth’s The Ghost Writer (1979) have focused on how the public controversy surrounding Nathan Zuckerman’s short story “Higher Education” enables Zuckerman to separate from his family and distinguish himself as an autonomous artist. Little has been said about the impact the public scandal had on the short story itself. This article contributes to filling that gap by arguing that the public scandal brings about Zuckerman’s decision to revise the short story, extending it and publishing it as a full-length book. Rather than Zuckerman revolting against the reception of the work, the reception is a catalyst for Zuckerman’s ability to decide what to do with his manuscript. While a draft of “Higher Education” causes a stir, it might be the scandal that causes “Higher Education” to become a published book in the second installment of the Zuckerman trilogy. Zuckerman is resentful of public pressures, but he is also buoyed by the conflict with his readers.","PeriodicalId":37093,"journal":{"name":"Philip Roth Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"63 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Higher Education” or the Making of a Succès de Scandale\",\"authors\":\"B. Streeter\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/prs.2021.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Recent studies of Philip Roth’s The Ghost Writer (1979) have focused on how the public controversy surrounding Nathan Zuckerman’s short story “Higher Education” enables Zuckerman to separate from his family and distinguish himself as an autonomous artist. Little has been said about the impact the public scandal had on the short story itself. This article contributes to filling that gap by arguing that the public scandal brings about Zuckerman’s decision to revise the short story, extending it and publishing it as a full-length book. Rather than Zuckerman revolting against the reception of the work, the reception is a catalyst for Zuckerman’s ability to decide what to do with his manuscript. While a draft of “Higher Education” causes a stir, it might be the scandal that causes “Higher Education” to become a published book in the second installment of the Zuckerman trilogy. Zuckerman is resentful of public pressures, but he is also buoyed by the conflict with his readers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philip Roth Studies\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"63 - 75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philip Roth Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/prs.2021.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philip Roth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/prs.2021.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:菲利普·罗斯(Philip Roth)的《幽灵作家》(The Ghost Writer)(1979)最近的研究集中在围绕内森·祖克曼(Nathan Zuckerman)短篇小说《高等教育》(Higher Education)的公众争议如何使祖克曼脱离家庭,成为一名独立的艺术家。关于公开丑闻对短篇小说本身的影响,人们几乎没有提及。这篇文章认为,公共丑闻导致祖克曼决定修改短篇小说,将其扩展并作为长篇小说出版,从而填补了这一空白。与其说祖克曼反对作品的接受,不如说接受是祖克曼决定如何处理手稿的催化剂。虽然《高等教育》的一份草案引起了轰动,但可能正是丑闻导致《高等教育”成为祖克曼三部曲第二部的出版书籍。祖克曼对公众压力感到不满,但他也因与读者的冲突而感到鼓舞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Higher Education” or the Making of a Succès de Scandale
ABSTRACT:Recent studies of Philip Roth’s The Ghost Writer (1979) have focused on how the public controversy surrounding Nathan Zuckerman’s short story “Higher Education” enables Zuckerman to separate from his family and distinguish himself as an autonomous artist. Little has been said about the impact the public scandal had on the short story itself. This article contributes to filling that gap by arguing that the public scandal brings about Zuckerman’s decision to revise the short story, extending it and publishing it as a full-length book. Rather than Zuckerman revolting against the reception of the work, the reception is a catalyst for Zuckerman’s ability to decide what to do with his manuscript. While a draft of “Higher Education” causes a stir, it might be the scandal that causes “Higher Education” to become a published book in the second installment of the Zuckerman trilogy. Zuckerman is resentful of public pressures, but he is also buoyed by the conflict with his readers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philip Roth Studies
Philip Roth Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editors' Note: Traveling with Roth Philip Roth and "My American Gang" In Medias Res Roth and Reputation versus Sex and Empowerment in The Dying Animal Hauntologies of Fiction: Reading Roth at the End of History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1