{"title":"关于形而上学解释的非认知主义","authors":"Kristie Miller, James Norton","doi":"10.1111/phib.12258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article introduces a non-cognitivist account of metaphysical explanation according to which the core function of judgements of the form ⌜x <i>because</i> y⌝ is not to state truth-apt beliefs. Instead, their core function is to express attitudes of <i>commitment to</i>, and <i>recommendation of the acceptance of</i> certain norms governing interventional conduct at contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45646,"journal":{"name":"Analytic Philosophy","volume":"64 2","pages":"106-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-cognitivism about Metaphysical explanation\",\"authors\":\"Kristie Miller, James Norton\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/phib.12258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article introduces a non-cognitivist account of metaphysical explanation according to which the core function of judgements of the form ⌜x <i>because</i> y⌝ is not to state truth-apt beliefs. Instead, their core function is to express attitudes of <i>commitment to</i>, and <i>recommendation of the acceptance of</i> certain norms governing interventional conduct at contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytic Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"64 2\",\"pages\":\"106-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytic Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/phib.12258\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytic Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/phib.12258","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article introduces a non-cognitivist account of metaphysical explanation according to which the core function of judgements of the form ⌜x because y⌝ is not to state truth-apt beliefs. Instead, their core function is to express attitudes of commitment to, and recommendation of the acceptance of certain norms governing interventional conduct at contexts.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
