有机农场的劳动力使用:2000年以来的研究综述

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Organic Farming Pub Date : 2018-06-22 DOI:10.12924/of2018.04010007
S. Orsini, S. Padel, N. Lampkin
{"title":"有机农场的劳动力使用:2000年以来的研究综述","authors":"S. Orsini, S. Padel, N. Lampkin","doi":"10.12924/of2018.04010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organic farming is frequently associated with claims of more labour requirements than conventional. However, there is a fragmented knowledge about labour use on organic farms in terms of workload, nature and quality of employment provided. In the context of a growing organic demand and a need for more farmers to convert to reach policy targets set by many EU governments, it seems crucial to understand labour trends on organic farms and to what extent labour requirements may hinder the adoption of the organic methods. This paper presents a review of mainly European literature published since 2000. Studies presenting results by farm type usually indicate higher labour use per hectare on organic than conventional arable farms, whereas similar or lower labour use is reported on organic livestock farms, and the results are mixed for other farm types. We have identified in the existing literature two broad dimensions directly related with labour use, which need to be considered in comparative studies, namely farm structure (including farm type, but also farm size and diversification activities), and technical efficiency. These two broad dimensions give us insights into some more specific factors affecting labour use, and how labour is related with productivity and technical efficiency. Overall it appears that claims that labour requirements represent a concrete obstacle to the adoption of the organic methods need to be treated with caution, and more research is needed to understand the role of labour in farmers’ decision to convert to organic farming. The review of the nature and quality of employment indicates positive health effects related to higher satisfaction and lower exposure to pesticides in organic agriculture as the most important advantages for farm workers. Overall, there is limited research on whether the organic sector provides better opportunities in terms of job prospects, wages and employment of women.","PeriodicalId":36542,"journal":{"name":"Organic Farming","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Labour Use on Organic Farms: A Review of Research since 2000\",\"authors\":\"S. Orsini, S. Padel, N. Lampkin\",\"doi\":\"10.12924/of2018.04010007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Organic farming is frequently associated with claims of more labour requirements than conventional. However, there is a fragmented knowledge about labour use on organic farms in terms of workload, nature and quality of employment provided. In the context of a growing organic demand and a need for more farmers to convert to reach policy targets set by many EU governments, it seems crucial to understand labour trends on organic farms and to what extent labour requirements may hinder the adoption of the organic methods. This paper presents a review of mainly European literature published since 2000. Studies presenting results by farm type usually indicate higher labour use per hectare on organic than conventional arable farms, whereas similar or lower labour use is reported on organic livestock farms, and the results are mixed for other farm types. We have identified in the existing literature two broad dimensions directly related with labour use, which need to be considered in comparative studies, namely farm structure (including farm type, but also farm size and diversification activities), and technical efficiency. These two broad dimensions give us insights into some more specific factors affecting labour use, and how labour is related with productivity and technical efficiency. Overall it appears that claims that labour requirements represent a concrete obstacle to the adoption of the organic methods need to be treated with caution, and more research is needed to understand the role of labour in farmers’ decision to convert to organic farming. The review of the nature and quality of employment indicates positive health effects related to higher satisfaction and lower exposure to pesticides in organic agriculture as the most important advantages for farm workers. Overall, there is limited research on whether the organic sector provides better opportunities in terms of job prospects, wages and employment of women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organic Farming\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organic Farming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12924/of2018.04010007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organic Farming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12924/of2018.04010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

有机农业经常与声称比传统农业需要更多劳动力有关。然而,在工作量、就业性质和质量方面,对有机农场劳动力使用的了解并不完整。在有机需求不断增长以及需要更多农民转变以实现许多欧盟政府设定的政策目标的背景下,了解有机农场的劳动力趋势以及劳动力需求在多大程度上可能阻碍有机方法的采用似乎至关重要。本文主要对2000年以来发表的欧洲文献进行综述。按农场类型提供结果的研究通常表明,有机农场的每公顷劳动力使用量高于传统耕地农场,而有机畜牧场的劳动力使用量相似或较低,其他农场类型的结果参差不齐。我们在现有文献中确定了与劳动力使用直接相关的两个广泛维度,需要在比较研究中加以考虑,即农场结构(包括农场类型,但也包括农场规模和多样化活动)和技术效率。这两个广泛的维度让我们深入了解了影响劳动力使用的一些更具体的因素,以及劳动力如何与生产力和技术效率相关。总的来说,似乎需要谨慎对待劳动力需求是采用有机方法的具体障碍的说法,需要进行更多的研究,以了解劳动力在农民决定转向有机农业中的作用。对就业性质和质量的审查表明,有机农业中较高的满意度和较低的农药暴露量对健康产生了积极影响,这是农场工人最重要的优势。总体而言,关于有机部门是否在妇女的就业前景、工资和就业方面提供了更好的机会的研究有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Labour Use on Organic Farms: A Review of Research since 2000
Organic farming is frequently associated with claims of more labour requirements than conventional. However, there is a fragmented knowledge about labour use on organic farms in terms of workload, nature and quality of employment provided. In the context of a growing organic demand and a need for more farmers to convert to reach policy targets set by many EU governments, it seems crucial to understand labour trends on organic farms and to what extent labour requirements may hinder the adoption of the organic methods. This paper presents a review of mainly European literature published since 2000. Studies presenting results by farm type usually indicate higher labour use per hectare on organic than conventional arable farms, whereas similar or lower labour use is reported on organic livestock farms, and the results are mixed for other farm types. We have identified in the existing literature two broad dimensions directly related with labour use, which need to be considered in comparative studies, namely farm structure (including farm type, but also farm size and diversification activities), and technical efficiency. These two broad dimensions give us insights into some more specific factors affecting labour use, and how labour is related with productivity and technical efficiency. Overall it appears that claims that labour requirements represent a concrete obstacle to the adoption of the organic methods need to be treated with caution, and more research is needed to understand the role of labour in farmers’ decision to convert to organic farming. The review of the nature and quality of employment indicates positive health effects related to higher satisfaction and lower exposure to pesticides in organic agriculture as the most important advantages for farm workers. Overall, there is limited research on whether the organic sector provides better opportunities in terms of job prospects, wages and employment of women.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Organic Farming
Organic Farming Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
On-farm Validation of Coffee arabica and Aloe vera Extracts for Management of Seed-Borne Bacterial Leaf Spot Disease of Tomato Growth and Yield Responses of Leafy Vegetables Grown in Organic and Conventional Agriculture Systems On-farm Research to Diversify Organic Farming Systems A Proposal for Improving Organic Group Certification Quantification of Internal Control Systems' Performance and Sample Size Determination Carrying Capacity of Traditional Farming in South East England: A Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1