什么是权威意图？

IF 0.1 3区文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE Pub Date : 2021-06-29 DOI:10.1353/phl.2021.0004

J. Farrell

{"title":"什么是权威意图？","authors":"J. Farrell","doi":"10.1353/phl.2021.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:For seven decades, professors of literature have considered referral to an author's intentions to be theoretically out of bounds, while in practice they do it all the time. I suggest that one reason for this undesirable gap between theory and practice is that, for literary scholars, the notion of intention itself is poorly understood. Authorial intention is thought of as single, simple, rationally generated, and preexisting in the author's mind rather than the multiple, complex, and process-based phenomenon that it is. In this essay I provide a bottom-up account of intention with the aim of dispelling this misunderstanding.","PeriodicalId":51912,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE","volume":"45 1","pages":"55 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/phl.2021.0004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is Authorial Intention?\",\"authors\":\"J. Farrell\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/phl.2021.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:For seven decades, professors of literature have considered referral to an author's intentions to be theoretically out of bounds, while in practice they do it all the time. I suggest that one reason for this undesirable gap between theory and practice is that, for literary scholars, the notion of intention itself is poorly understood. Authorial intention is thought of as single, simple, rationally generated, and preexisting in the author's mind rather than the multiple, complex, and process-based phenomenon that it is. In this essay I provide a bottom-up account of intention with the aim of dispelling this misunderstanding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"55 - 70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/phl.2021.0004\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.2021.0004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.2021.0004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要：70年来，文学教授们一直认为，从理论上讲，提及作者的意图是越界的，而在实践中，他们一直在这样做。我认为，理论和实践之间存在这种不可取的差距的一个原因是，对于文学学者来说，意图本身的概念理解得很差。权威意图被认为是单一的、简单的、理性产生的和预先存在于作者脑海中的，而不是它本身的多重的、复杂的和基于过程的现象。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

What is Authorial Intention?

Abstract:For seven decades, professors of literature have considered referral to an author's intentions to be theoretically out of bounds, while in practice they do it all the time. I suggest that one reason for this undesirable gap between theory and practice is that, for literary scholars, the notion of intention itself is poorly understood. Authorial intention is thought of as single, simple, rationally generated, and preexisting in the author's mind rather than the multiple, complex, and process-based phenomenon that it is. In this essay I provide a bottom-up account of intention with the aim of dispelling this misunderstanding.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE Multiple-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： For more than a quarter century, Philosophy and Literature has explored the dialogue between literary and philosophical studies. The journal offers a constant source of fresh, stimulating ideas in the aesthetics of literature, theory of criticism, philosophical interpretation of literature, and literary treatment of philosophy. Philosophy and Literature challenges the cant and pretensions of academic priesthoods by publishing an assortment of lively, wide-ranging essays, notes, and reviews that are written in clear, jargon-free prose. In his regular column, editor Denis Dutton targets the fashions and inanities of contemporary intellectual life.

期刊最新文献

How Blue Is Read: Language and Sensation in Literature and Philosophy Three Poems on Memory The Literary Bias: Narrative and the Self Playing the Dummy: Maugham, Smartphones, and the End of Elegance The Philosophy of Isaiah Berlin by Johnny Lyons (review)