脉冲振荡测量在哮喘患者小气道功能障碍中的应用及其在哮喘控制中的应用

IF 1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Egyptian Journal of Bronchology Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.4103/ejb.ejb_16_19
R. Sharshar
{"title":"脉冲振荡测量在哮喘患者小气道功能障碍中的应用及其在哮喘控制中的应用","authors":"R. Sharshar","doi":"10.4103/ejb.ejb_16_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Small-airway affection and its relation to clinical status in asthmatic patients became an increasing interest during the last decade. Spirometry is a basic diagnostic tool for measuring pulmonary function in asthmatics but not fully illustrative especially in assessing small airways. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) can be considered a complementary and sometimes alternative technique to spirometry because it is used during quiet breathing and so gives more data about small-airways affection in asthmatic patients. Aim To evaluate IOS usefulness in the detection of small-airways disease in asthma and its correlation to the level of disease control. Patients and methods The study was conducted on 44 asthmatic patients who were classified into two groups: controlled asthma and uncontrolled asthma by asthma control test questionnaire (ACT score). Spirometry and IOS were performed on all patients. Results Small-airway IOS values (R5–20, X5, and AX) were found to be statistically significant between two groups. Moreover, they strongly correlated significantly with clinical symptoms, assessed by ACT. There was high sensitivity and specificity of (R5–20) 80 and 82%, (X5) 80 and 86%, and (AX) 86 and 89%, while for spirometric data only forced expiratory flow (FEF25–75%) showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups, and not FEV1% and there was poor correlation between ACT and FEF25–75%. Conclusion IOS provides an easy and rapid tool to diagnose and assess small-airways disease in adult, asthmatic patients","PeriodicalId":34128,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Bronchology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impulse oscillometry usefulness in small-airway dysfunction in asthmatics and its utility in asthma control\",\"authors\":\"R. Sharshar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ejb.ejb_16_19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Small-airway affection and its relation to clinical status in asthmatic patients became an increasing interest during the last decade. Spirometry is a basic diagnostic tool for measuring pulmonary function in asthmatics but not fully illustrative especially in assessing small airways. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) can be considered a complementary and sometimes alternative technique to spirometry because it is used during quiet breathing and so gives more data about small-airways affection in asthmatic patients. Aim To evaluate IOS usefulness in the detection of small-airways disease in asthma and its correlation to the level of disease control. Patients and methods The study was conducted on 44 asthmatic patients who were classified into two groups: controlled asthma and uncontrolled asthma by asthma control test questionnaire (ACT score). Spirometry and IOS were performed on all patients. Results Small-airway IOS values (R5–20, X5, and AX) were found to be statistically significant between two groups. Moreover, they strongly correlated significantly with clinical symptoms, assessed by ACT. There was high sensitivity and specificity of (R5–20) 80 and 82%, (X5) 80 and 86%, and (AX) 86 and 89%, while for spirometric data only forced expiratory flow (FEF25–75%) showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups, and not FEV1% and there was poor correlation between ACT and FEF25–75%. Conclusion IOS provides an easy and rapid tool to diagnose and assess small-airways disease in adult, asthmatic patients\",\"PeriodicalId\":34128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Bronchology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Bronchology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_16_19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Bronchology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_16_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景近十年来,哮喘患者的小气道病变及其与临床状况的关系越来越引起人们的兴趣。肺活量测定法是测量哮喘患者肺功能的基本诊断工具,但不能完全说明问题,尤其是在评估小气道时。脉冲示波法(IOS)可以被认为是肺活量测定法的一种补充技术,有时也是一种替代技术,因为它用于安静呼吸,因此可以提供更多关于哮喘患者小气道影响的数据。目的评价IOS在哮喘小气道疾病检测中的作用及其与疾病控制水平的相关性。患者和方法采用哮喘控制测试问卷(ACT评分)将44例哮喘患者分为控制性哮喘和非控制性哮喘两组。对所有患者进行肺活量测定和IOS检查。结果小气道IOS值(R5–20、X5和AX)在两组之间具有统计学意义。此外,通过ACT评估,它们与临床症状显著相关。(R5–20)80和82%、(X5)80和86%以及(AX)86和89%的敏感性和特异性较高,而对于肺活量测定数据,只有用力呼气流量(FEF25–75%)显示两组之间存在统计学显著差异,而FEV1%没有,ACT和FEF25-75%之间的相关性较差。结论IOS为诊断和评估成人哮喘患者的小气道疾病提供了一种简单、快速的工具
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impulse oscillometry usefulness in small-airway dysfunction in asthmatics and its utility in asthma control
Background Small-airway affection and its relation to clinical status in asthmatic patients became an increasing interest during the last decade. Spirometry is a basic diagnostic tool for measuring pulmonary function in asthmatics but not fully illustrative especially in assessing small airways. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) can be considered a complementary and sometimes alternative technique to spirometry because it is used during quiet breathing and so gives more data about small-airways affection in asthmatic patients. Aim To evaluate IOS usefulness in the detection of small-airways disease in asthma and its correlation to the level of disease control. Patients and methods The study was conducted on 44 asthmatic patients who were classified into two groups: controlled asthma and uncontrolled asthma by asthma control test questionnaire (ACT score). Spirometry and IOS were performed on all patients. Results Small-airway IOS values (R5–20, X5, and AX) were found to be statistically significant between two groups. Moreover, they strongly correlated significantly with clinical symptoms, assessed by ACT. There was high sensitivity and specificity of (R5–20) 80 and 82%, (X5) 80 and 86%, and (AX) 86 and 89%, while for spirometric data only forced expiratory flow (FEF25–75%) showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups, and not FEV1% and there was poor correlation between ACT and FEF25–75%. Conclusion IOS provides an easy and rapid tool to diagnose and assess small-airways disease in adult, asthmatic patients
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Bronchology
Egyptian Journal of Bronchology RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
7.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of atypical pneumonia by chest ultrasonography Safety and efficacy of high flow nasal canula in patients with mild hypercapnia Impact of comorbid pulmonary disease on COVID-19 disease severity and outcome: a retrospective cohort study Imaging changes of oil aspiration over time in children: a case series Diagnostic yield of combined ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy versus either technique alone in peripheral lung and pleural lesions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1