人力资本组成部分工资回报的性别差异:欧洲劳动力市场有多大差异?

IF 1.2 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Baltic Journal of Economics Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/1406099X.2022.2033418
Maryna Tverdostup, T. Paas
{"title":"人力资本组成部分工资回报的性别差异:欧洲劳动力市场有多大差异?","authors":"Maryna Tverdostup, T. Paas","doi":"10.1080/1406099X.2022.2033418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The paper investigates the gender wage gap in relation to the multi-dimensional human capital measure, asking which human capital components are most valued in the European labour markets. Relying on the Programme of International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) data for seventeen European countries and applying Gelbach (2016) decomposition, we document remarkable cross-country disparities in the returns to different human capital components. The only dimension that consistently and significantly decreases gender wage disparities in all countries is work experience related to a currently occupied position. Numeracy cognitive ability is another strong predictors of the gender wage disparity, while job-specific cognitive and non-cognitive skills reveal weaker than expected association with the gender wage gap. Unlike the studies stressing the decreasing importance of human capital in the gender wage gap assessment, we argue that a narrow definition of human capital may undermine the actual effect of the latter.","PeriodicalId":43756,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Economics","volume":"22 1","pages":"28 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender disparities in wage returns to human capital components: how different are European labour markets?\",\"authors\":\"Maryna Tverdostup, T. Paas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1406099X.2022.2033418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The paper investigates the gender wage gap in relation to the multi-dimensional human capital measure, asking which human capital components are most valued in the European labour markets. Relying on the Programme of International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) data for seventeen European countries and applying Gelbach (2016) decomposition, we document remarkable cross-country disparities in the returns to different human capital components. The only dimension that consistently and significantly decreases gender wage disparities in all countries is work experience related to a currently occupied position. Numeracy cognitive ability is another strong predictors of the gender wage disparity, while job-specific cognitive and non-cognitive skills reveal weaker than expected association with the gender wage gap. Unlike the studies stressing the decreasing importance of human capital in the gender wage gap assessment, we argue that a narrow definition of human capital may undermine the actual effect of the latter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baltic Journal of Economics\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"28 - 48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baltic Journal of Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099X.2022.2033418\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099X.2022.2033418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文调查了与多维人力资本衡量相关的性别工资差距,询问欧洲劳动力市场中哪些人力资本成分最受重视。根据17个欧洲国家的国际成人能力评估计划(PIAC)数据,并应用Gelbach(2016)分解,我们记录了不同人力资本组成部分回报的显著跨国差异。在所有国家,持续和显著减少性别工资差距的唯一因素是与当前职位相关的工作经验。算术认知能力是性别工资差距的另一个有力预测因素,而特定工作的认知和非认知技能与性别工资差距之间的关联弱于预期。与强调人力资本在性别工资差距评估中重要性下降的研究不同,我们认为,对人力资本的狭义定义可能会破坏后者的实际效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender disparities in wage returns to human capital components: how different are European labour markets?
ABSTRACT The paper investigates the gender wage gap in relation to the multi-dimensional human capital measure, asking which human capital components are most valued in the European labour markets. Relying on the Programme of International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) data for seventeen European countries and applying Gelbach (2016) decomposition, we document remarkable cross-country disparities in the returns to different human capital components. The only dimension that consistently and significantly decreases gender wage disparities in all countries is work experience related to a currently occupied position. Numeracy cognitive ability is another strong predictors of the gender wage disparity, while job-specific cognitive and non-cognitive skills reveal weaker than expected association with the gender wage gap. Unlike the studies stressing the decreasing importance of human capital in the gender wage gap assessment, we argue that a narrow definition of human capital may undermine the actual effect of the latter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Economic upgrading of Central and Eastern European economies through global value chain participation and foreign direct investment Are Poles stuck in overeducation? Individual dynamics of educational mismatch in Poland Choosing the European fiscal rule A long-run perspective on Latvian regional gross domestic product inequality, 1925–2016 The communication reaction function of the European Central Bank. An analysis using topic modelling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1