肝细胞癌放射栓塞术后早期疾病进展的相关临床因素及进展后全身治疗的可行性

Charlotte Van Laeken, Thibault Taelman, Sarah Cappuyns, Geert Maleux, Vincent Vandecaveye, Chris Verslype, Christophe Deroose, Jeroen Dekervel
{"title":"肝细胞癌放射栓塞术后早期疾病进展的相关临床因素及进展后全身治疗的可行性","authors":"Charlotte Van Laeken,&nbsp;Thibault Taelman,&nbsp;Sarah Cappuyns,&nbsp;Geert Maleux,&nbsp;Vincent Vandecaveye,&nbsp;Chris Verslype,&nbsp;Christophe Deroose,&nbsp;Jeroen Dekervel","doi":"10.1002/lci2.60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Radioembolization (RE) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can provide clinical benefit for well-selected patients, whilst in others, rapid disease progression is observed. As an alternative for this patient population, new potent systemic treatment options are emerging. We aimed to identify the clinical factors associated with rapid progression following RE and assess the feasibility of starting a systemic treatment after progression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective cohort study of patients with unresectable HCC undergoing RE at a single referral centre between January 2009 and December 2018. Progression-free and overall survival times were calculated. Uni- and multivariate cox regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with poor outcomes. Charts were reviewed for post-progression treatment strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 116 patients with unresectable HCC were included. Median PFS after RE was 6.7 months (95% CI 3.97–9.37), which varied significantly (<i>P</i> &lt; .001) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (EGOC PS) (ECOG 0, 20.9 months [95% CI 8.6–33.2]; ECOG 1, 7.7 months [95% CI 3.1–12.1]; ECOG 2, 4.4 months [95% CI 1.7–7]). This association remained significant after multivariate testing, together with the number of HCC lesions (<i>P</i> = .017) and α-FP (<i>P</i> = .050). Progressive disease after RE occurred in 82 patients, of whom only 40 received subsequent systemic treatment. Again, ECOG PS at the time of progression was significantly better for patients who did receive systemic treatment versus those who did not (<i>P</i> = .002).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with unresectable HCC, impaired general condition and multinodular disease have inferior outcomes after radioembolization. After RE, close monitoring of patient performance status, liver function and cancer control is warranted to allow timely initiation of systemic treatment when indicated.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93331,"journal":{"name":"Liver cancer international","volume":"3 3","pages":"128-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lci2.60","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical factors associated with early disease progression after radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma and feasibility of post-progression systemic therapy\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Van Laeken,&nbsp;Thibault Taelman,&nbsp;Sarah Cappuyns,&nbsp;Geert Maleux,&nbsp;Vincent Vandecaveye,&nbsp;Chris Verslype,&nbsp;Christophe Deroose,&nbsp;Jeroen Dekervel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lci2.60\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Radioembolization (RE) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can provide clinical benefit for well-selected patients, whilst in others, rapid disease progression is observed. As an alternative for this patient population, new potent systemic treatment options are emerging. We aimed to identify the clinical factors associated with rapid progression following RE and assess the feasibility of starting a systemic treatment after progression.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective cohort study of patients with unresectable HCC undergoing RE at a single referral centre between January 2009 and December 2018. Progression-free and overall survival times were calculated. Uni- and multivariate cox regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with poor outcomes. Charts were reviewed for post-progression treatment strategies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, 116 patients with unresectable HCC were included. Median PFS after RE was 6.7 months (95% CI 3.97–9.37), which varied significantly (<i>P</i> &lt; .001) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (EGOC PS) (ECOG 0, 20.9 months [95% CI 8.6–33.2]; ECOG 1, 7.7 months [95% CI 3.1–12.1]; ECOG 2, 4.4 months [95% CI 1.7–7]). This association remained significant after multivariate testing, together with the number of HCC lesions (<i>P</i> = .017) and α-FP (<i>P</i> = .050). Progressive disease after RE occurred in 82 patients, of whom only 40 received subsequent systemic treatment. Again, ECOG PS at the time of progression was significantly better for patients who did receive systemic treatment versus those who did not (<i>P</i> = .002).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients with unresectable HCC, impaired general condition and multinodular disease have inferior outcomes after radioembolization. After RE, close monitoring of patient performance status, liver function and cancer control is warranted to allow timely initiation of systemic treatment when indicated.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liver cancer international\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"128-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lci2.60\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liver cancer international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lci2.60\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver cancer international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lci2.60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的放射栓塞(RE)治疗不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)可以为选定的患者提供临床益处,而在其他患者中,观察到疾病的快速进展。作为这一患者群体的替代方案,新的有效的全身治疗方案正在出现。我们的目的是确定与RE后快速进展相关的临床因素,并评估进展后开始全身治疗的可行性。方法回顾性队列研究2009年1月至2018年12月在单个转诊中心接受RE治疗的不可切除HCC患者。计算无进展生存时间和总生存时间。采用单因素和多因素cox回归分析评估与不良预后相关的因素。回顾了进展后治疗策略的图表。结果共纳入116例不可切除HCC患者。RE后的中位PFS为6.7个月(95% CI 3.97-9.37),与东部肿瘤合作组绩效状态(ECOG) (ECOG 0, 20.9个月[95% CI 8.6-33.2];ECOG 1,7.7个月[95% CI 3.1-12.1];ECOG 2, 4.4个月[95% CI 1.7-7])。在多变量检验后,这种关联仍然显著,包括HCC病变数量(P = 0.017)和α-FP (P = 0.050)。82例患者发生RE后的进展性疾病,其中只有40例接受了后续的全身治疗。同样,接受全身治疗的患者在进展时的ECOG PS明显优于未接受全身治疗的患者(P = 0.002)。结论不可切除的肝细胞癌、全身功能受损及多结节病变患者行放射栓塞治疗后预后较差。RE术后,应密切监测患者的身体状况、肝功能和癌症控制情况,以便在需要时及时开始全身治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical factors associated with early disease progression after radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma and feasibility of post-progression systemic therapy

Background and Aims

Radioembolization (RE) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can provide clinical benefit for well-selected patients, whilst in others, rapid disease progression is observed. As an alternative for this patient population, new potent systemic treatment options are emerging. We aimed to identify the clinical factors associated with rapid progression following RE and assess the feasibility of starting a systemic treatment after progression.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of patients with unresectable HCC undergoing RE at a single referral centre between January 2009 and December 2018. Progression-free and overall survival times were calculated. Uni- and multivariate cox regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with poor outcomes. Charts were reviewed for post-progression treatment strategies.

Results

Overall, 116 patients with unresectable HCC were included. Median PFS after RE was 6.7 months (95% CI 3.97–9.37), which varied significantly (P < .001) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (EGOC PS) (ECOG 0, 20.9 months [95% CI 8.6–33.2]; ECOG 1, 7.7 months [95% CI 3.1–12.1]; ECOG 2, 4.4 months [95% CI 1.7–7]). This association remained significant after multivariate testing, together with the number of HCC lesions (P = .017) and α-FP (P = .050). Progressive disease after RE occurred in 82 patients, of whom only 40 received subsequent systemic treatment. Again, ECOG PS at the time of progression was significantly better for patients who did receive systemic treatment versus those who did not (P = .002).

Conclusion

Patients with unresectable HCC, impaired general condition and multinodular disease have inferior outcomes after radioembolization. After RE, close monitoring of patient performance status, liver function and cancer control is warranted to allow timely initiation of systemic treatment when indicated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Histology Detection in MASH Cirrhosis for Artificial Intelligence Pathology Platform by Expert Pathologist Training An Insight into the Genetic Predisposition of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Africa Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With Immunotherapy for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma-A Review Shared genetic architecture of non-viral cirrhosis with several pleiotropic traits: A nested case-control study in the UK Biobank Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1