脉动双星合成光曲线设计与周期性检测效率比较

IF 3.2 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Galaxies Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI:10.3390/galaxies11030069
Aldana Alberici Adam, Gunther F. Avila Marín, A. Christen, L. Cidale
{"title":"脉动双星合成光曲线设计与周期性检测效率比较","authors":"Aldana Alberici Adam, Gunther F. Avila Marín, A. Christen, L. Cidale","doi":"10.3390/galaxies11030069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"B supergiant stars pulsate in regular and quasi-regular oscillations resulting in intricate light variations that might conceal their binary nature. To discuss possible observational bias in a light curve, we performed a simulation design of a binary star affected by sinusoidal functions emulating pulsation phenomena. The Period04 tool and the WaveletComp package of R were used for this purpose. Thirty-two models were analysed based on a combination of two values on each of the k = 6 variables, such as multiple pulsations, the amplitude of the pulsation, the pulsation frequency, the beating phenomenon, the light-time effect, and regular or quasi-regular periods. These synthetic models, unlike others, consider an ARMA (1, 1) statistical noise, irregular sampling, and a gap of about 4 days. Comparing Morlet wavelet with Fourier methods, we observed that the orbital period and its harmonics were well detected in most cases. Although the Fourier method provided more accurate period detection, the wavelet analysis found it more times. Periods seen with the wavelet method have a shift due to the slightly irregular time scale used. The pulsation period hitting rate depends on the wave amplitude and frequency with respect to eclipse depth and orbital period. None of the methods was able to distinguish accurate periods leading to a beating phenomenon when they were longer than the orbital period, resulting, in both cases, in an intermediate value. When the beating period was shorter, the Fourier analysis found it in all cases except for unsolved quasi-regular periods. Overall, the Morlet wavelet analysis performance was lower than the Fourier analysis. Considering the strengths and disadvantages found in these methods, we recommend using at least two diagnosis tools for a detailed time series data analysis to obtain confident results. Moreover, a fine-tuning of trial periods by applying phase diagrams would be helpful for recovering accurate values. The combined analysis could reduce observational bias in searching binaries using photometric techniques.","PeriodicalId":37570,"journal":{"name":"Galaxies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthetic Light Curve Design for Pulsating Binary Stars to Compare the Efficiency in the Detection of Periodicities\",\"authors\":\"Aldana Alberici Adam, Gunther F. Avila Marín, A. Christen, L. Cidale\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/galaxies11030069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"B supergiant stars pulsate in regular and quasi-regular oscillations resulting in intricate light variations that might conceal their binary nature. To discuss possible observational bias in a light curve, we performed a simulation design of a binary star affected by sinusoidal functions emulating pulsation phenomena. The Period04 tool and the WaveletComp package of R were used for this purpose. Thirty-two models were analysed based on a combination of two values on each of the k = 6 variables, such as multiple pulsations, the amplitude of the pulsation, the pulsation frequency, the beating phenomenon, the light-time effect, and regular or quasi-regular periods. These synthetic models, unlike others, consider an ARMA (1, 1) statistical noise, irregular sampling, and a gap of about 4 days. Comparing Morlet wavelet with Fourier methods, we observed that the orbital period and its harmonics were well detected in most cases. Although the Fourier method provided more accurate period detection, the wavelet analysis found it more times. Periods seen with the wavelet method have a shift due to the slightly irregular time scale used. The pulsation period hitting rate depends on the wave amplitude and frequency with respect to eclipse depth and orbital period. None of the methods was able to distinguish accurate periods leading to a beating phenomenon when they were longer than the orbital period, resulting, in both cases, in an intermediate value. When the beating period was shorter, the Fourier analysis found it in all cases except for unsolved quasi-regular periods. Overall, the Morlet wavelet analysis performance was lower than the Fourier analysis. Considering the strengths and disadvantages found in these methods, we recommend using at least two diagnosis tools for a detailed time series data analysis to obtain confident results. Moreover, a fine-tuning of trial periods by applying phase diagrams would be helpful for recovering accurate values. The combined analysis could reduce observational bias in searching binaries using photometric techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Galaxies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Galaxies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies11030069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Galaxies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies11030069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

B超巨星在规则和准规则的振荡中脉动,导致复杂的光变化,这可能掩盖了它们的双星性质。为了讨论光曲线中可能存在的观测偏差,我们对一颗双星进行了模拟设计,该双星受到模拟脉动现象的正弦函数的影响。Period04工具和R的WaveletComp包用于此目的。根据k=6个变量中每个变量的两个值的组合,分析了32个模型,如多次脉动、脉动幅度、脉动频率、跳动现象、光时间效应以及规则或准规则周期。与其他模型不同,这些合成模型考虑了ARMA(1,1)统计噪声、不规则采样和大约4天的间隔。将Morlet小波与傅立叶方法进行比较,我们观察到轨道周期及其谐波在大多数情况下都能很好地检测到。虽然傅立叶方法提供了更精确的周期检测,但小波分析发现它的次数更多。使用小波方法看到的周期由于所使用的时间尺度稍微不规则而发生偏移。脉动周期命中率取决于相对于日食深度和轨道周期的波幅和频率。当周期长于轨道周期时,没有一种方法能够区分导致跳动现象的准确周期,在这两种情况下,都会产生中间值。当拍频周期较短时,傅立叶分析在所有情况下都发现了拍频周期,除了未解决的准正则周期。总体而言,Morlet小波分析的性能低于傅立叶分析。考虑到这些方法的优缺点,我们建议至少使用两种诊断工具进行详细的时间序列数据分析,以获得可靠的结果。此外,通过应用相位图对试验周期进行微调将有助于恢复准确的值。联合分析可以减少使用光度技术搜索双星的观测偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Synthetic Light Curve Design for Pulsating Binary Stars to Compare the Efficiency in the Detection of Periodicities
B supergiant stars pulsate in regular and quasi-regular oscillations resulting in intricate light variations that might conceal their binary nature. To discuss possible observational bias in a light curve, we performed a simulation design of a binary star affected by sinusoidal functions emulating pulsation phenomena. The Period04 tool and the WaveletComp package of R were used for this purpose. Thirty-two models were analysed based on a combination of two values on each of the k = 6 variables, such as multiple pulsations, the amplitude of the pulsation, the pulsation frequency, the beating phenomenon, the light-time effect, and regular or quasi-regular periods. These synthetic models, unlike others, consider an ARMA (1, 1) statistical noise, irregular sampling, and a gap of about 4 days. Comparing Morlet wavelet with Fourier methods, we observed that the orbital period and its harmonics were well detected in most cases. Although the Fourier method provided more accurate period detection, the wavelet analysis found it more times. Periods seen with the wavelet method have a shift due to the slightly irregular time scale used. The pulsation period hitting rate depends on the wave amplitude and frequency with respect to eclipse depth and orbital period. None of the methods was able to distinguish accurate periods leading to a beating phenomenon when they were longer than the orbital period, resulting, in both cases, in an intermediate value. When the beating period was shorter, the Fourier analysis found it in all cases except for unsolved quasi-regular periods. Overall, the Morlet wavelet analysis performance was lower than the Fourier analysis. Considering the strengths and disadvantages found in these methods, we recommend using at least two diagnosis tools for a detailed time series data analysis to obtain confident results. Moreover, a fine-tuning of trial periods by applying phase diagrams would be helpful for recovering accurate values. The combined analysis could reduce observational bias in searching binaries using photometric techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Galaxies
Galaxies Physics and Astronomy-Astronomy and Astrophysics
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
12.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una revista internacional de acceso abierto revisada por pares que proporciona un foro avanzado para estudios relacionados con astronomía, astrofísica y cosmología. Areas temáticas Astronomía Astrofísica Cosmología Astronomía observacional: radio, infrarrojo, óptico, rayos X, neutrino, etc. Ciencia planetaria Equipos y tecnologías de astronomía. Ingeniería Aeroespacial Análisis de datos astronómicos. Astroquímica y Astrobiología. Arqueoastronomía Historia de la astronomía y cosmología. Problemas filosóficos en cosmología.
期刊最新文献
Considerations on Possible Directions for a Wide Band Polarimetry X-ray Mission SS 433: Flares and L2 Overflow Spirals Planetary Nebulae Research: Past, Present, and Future On the Making of IXPE Correlations between IR Luminosity, Star Formation Rate, and CO Luminosity in the Local Universe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1