企业社会责任与财务报告质量:来自重述的证据

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting Accounting and the Public Interest Pub Date : 2020-07-15 DOI:10.2308/api-19-010
Yi‐Hung Lin, H. Huang, Mark Riley, Chih-Chen Lee
{"title":"企业社会责任与财务报告质量:来自重述的证据","authors":"Yi‐Hung Lin, H. Huang, Mark Riley, Chih-Chen Lee","doi":"10.2308/api-19-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We find a negative relationship between aggregate CSR scores and the probability that firms restated financial statements over the period 1991–2012. We then break that period into three sub-periods in order to determine whether the relationship holds for all three sub-periods. During the sub-periods of 1991–2001 and 2002–2005, the negative CSR score-restatement probability relationship holds. The negative relationship disappears in the 2006–2012 sub-period. Additional analyses indicate CSR scores are significantly higher in the 2006–2012 sub-period, suggesting the disappearance of the relationship between aggregate CSR scores and financial statement quality may relate to changes in CSR assessments and the CSR reporting environment. Our findings update the literature linking CSR scores and financial reporting quality and identify the need for further research as to the reasons the link between these constructs disappeared.","PeriodicalId":38883,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and the Public Interest","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Restatements\",\"authors\":\"Yi‐Hung Lin, H. Huang, Mark Riley, Chih-Chen Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/api-19-010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We find a negative relationship between aggregate CSR scores and the probability that firms restated financial statements over the period 1991–2012. We then break that period into three sub-periods in order to determine whether the relationship holds for all three sub-periods. During the sub-periods of 1991–2001 and 2002–2005, the negative CSR score-restatement probability relationship holds. The negative relationship disappears in the 2006–2012 sub-period. Additional analyses indicate CSR scores are significantly higher in the 2006–2012 sub-period, suggesting the disappearance of the relationship between aggregate CSR scores and financial statement quality may relate to changes in CSR assessments and the CSR reporting environment. Our findings update the literature linking CSR scores and financial reporting quality and identify the need for further research as to the reasons the link between these constructs disappeared.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting and the Public Interest\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting and the Public Interest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/api-19-010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and the Public Interest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/api-19-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们发现,企业社会责任总分与企业重述1991-2012年期间财务报表的概率之间存在负相关关系。然后,我们将该时段划分为三个子时段,以确定该关系是否适用于所有三个子时段。在1991-2001年和2002-2005年的子时期,企业社会责任得分重述概率关系为负。这种负面关系在2006年至2012年期间消失。其他分析表明,在2006-2012年的子时期,企业社会责任得分明显更高,这表明企业社会责任总分与财务报表质量之间关系的消失可能与企业社会责任评估和企业社会责任报告环境的变化有关。我们的研究结果更新了将企业社会责任评分与财务报告质量联系起来的文献,并确定了对这些结构之间联系消失的原因进行进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Restatements
We find a negative relationship between aggregate CSR scores and the probability that firms restated financial statements over the period 1991–2012. We then break that period into three sub-periods in order to determine whether the relationship holds for all three sub-periods. During the sub-periods of 1991–2001 and 2002–2005, the negative CSR score-restatement probability relationship holds. The negative relationship disappears in the 2006–2012 sub-period. Additional analyses indicate CSR scores are significantly higher in the 2006–2012 sub-period, suggesting the disappearance of the relationship between aggregate CSR scores and financial statement quality may relate to changes in CSR assessments and the CSR reporting environment. Our findings update the literature linking CSR scores and financial reporting quality and identify the need for further research as to the reasons the link between these constructs disappeared.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting and the Public Interest
Accounting and the Public Interest Business, Management and Accounting-Accounting
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Self-Concept Priming and Message Framing As Strategies for Improving Individuals’ Compliance: A Case Study of Bicultural Taxpayers’ Tip Reporting Editorial Policy The Impact of the Global Pandemic on Ethics, Professionalism, and Judgment in Accounting and Financial Reporting Data Breach Severity and Debt Market Responses Covers and Front Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1