性别脆弱性和《2030年议程》“不让任何人掉队”承诺的盲点

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Critical Policy Studies Pub Date : 2021-12-12 DOI:10.1080/19460171.2021.2014342
Hilde Ousland Vandeskog, K. Heggen, Eivind Engebretsen
{"title":"性别脆弱性和《2030年议程》“不让任何人掉队”承诺的盲点","authors":"Hilde Ousland Vandeskog, K. Heggen, Eivind Engebretsen","doi":"10.1080/19460171.2021.2014342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Agenda 2030 with the Sustainable Development Goals makes the transformative pledge to ‘leave no one behind.’ This paper asks how Agenda 2030 bring certain gendered vulnerabilities to light and make others invisible, and how this affects that transformative pledge. Through a close reading supported by Chantal Mouffe and Ernesto Laclau’s discourse theory we explore the concept of gender in Agenda 2030 and how it captures gendered vulnerabilities. For contrast, we analyzed a statement by Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity and Expression (SOGIE) activists.","PeriodicalId":51625,"journal":{"name":"Critical Policy Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"424 - 440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gendered vulnerabilities and the blind spots of the 2030 Agenda’s ‘leave no one behind’ pledge\",\"authors\":\"Hilde Ousland Vandeskog, K. Heggen, Eivind Engebretsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19460171.2021.2014342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Agenda 2030 with the Sustainable Development Goals makes the transformative pledge to ‘leave no one behind.’ This paper asks how Agenda 2030 bring certain gendered vulnerabilities to light and make others invisible, and how this affects that transformative pledge. Through a close reading supported by Chantal Mouffe and Ernesto Laclau’s discourse theory we explore the concept of gender in Agenda 2030 and how it captures gendered vulnerabilities. For contrast, we analyzed a statement by Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity and Expression (SOGIE) activists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Policy Studies\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"424 - 440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Policy Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2021.2014342\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2021.2014342","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

带有可持续发展目标的《2030年议程》做出了“不让任何一个人掉队”的变革性承诺。本文探讨了《2030年议程》如何将某些性别脆弱性暴露出来,并使其他脆弱性隐形,以及这如何影响这一变革性承诺。在Chantal Mouffe和Ernesto Laclau的话语理论的支持下,我们通过细读探讨了2030议程中的性别概念,以及它如何捕捉性别脆弱性。作为对比,我们分析了性取向和性别认同与表达(SOGIE)活动人士的一份声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gendered vulnerabilities and the blind spots of the 2030 Agenda’s ‘leave no one behind’ pledge
ABSTRACT Agenda 2030 with the Sustainable Development Goals makes the transformative pledge to ‘leave no one behind.’ This paper asks how Agenda 2030 bring certain gendered vulnerabilities to light and make others invisible, and how this affects that transformative pledge. Through a close reading supported by Chantal Mouffe and Ernesto Laclau’s discourse theory we explore the concept of gender in Agenda 2030 and how it captures gendered vulnerabilities. For contrast, we analyzed a statement by Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity and Expression (SOGIE) activists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
The Bolsonaro Government’s 2019 pension reform in Brazil: a policy discourse analysis Reparative public policy Variegated Economies Variegated Economies , by Jamie Peck, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2023, 392pp., hardback: GBP 64.00 paperback and e-book: GBP 19.99 ISBN 978-019-007-693-1 Responsibility and innovation for low waste and circular economy transitions: what roles for households? Public Policy and Indigenous Futures Public Policy and Indigenous Futures , edited by Nikki Moodie and Sarah Maddison, Singapore, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, 2023, 129 pp., EUR €93.08 (ebook), €109.99 (hardcover), ISBN 978-981-19-9319-0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1