非凸环境技术下的绿色生产力演化

IF 3.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Efficiency Pub Date : 2023-07-05 DOI:10.1007/s12053-023-10136-2
Jinyang Cai, Xingyu Xu, Tomas Balezentis, Z. Y. Shen
{"title":"非凸环境技术下的绿色生产力演化","authors":"Jinyang Cai,&nbsp;Xingyu Xu,&nbsp;Tomas Balezentis,&nbsp;Z. Y. Shen","doi":"10.1007/s12053-023-10136-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most of empirical studies assume convex production technology to analyze productivity growth at the aggregate level. However, convexity assumption implies benchmarking against production plans that are not empirically observed. Unlike previous studies, we adopt a non-convex approach based on observed input–output combinations, which requires minimal assumptions in terms of production technology. Incorporating energy and carbon emissions into the production function, this paper investigates green growth and its driving forces among 39 European countries over 1991–2019. A by-production technology is applied alongside the environmental Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen (LHM) productivity indicator and directional distance functions. The results show that the production technology has been expanding (i.e., technical progress), whereas scale inefficiency led to the negative green total factor productivity (TFP) growth in Europe. At the group level, green TFP in OECD countries tends to increase, whereas a sharp decline is observed for non-OECD countries. Furthermore, we note that human capital, R&amp;D intensity, energy consumption structure, and urbanization level all have significant positive impacts on green TFP growth in Europe, especially for non-OECD countries. The corresponding policy implications are derived to promote regional cooperation and technology sharing.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"16 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green productivity evolution under non-convex environmental technology\",\"authors\":\"Jinyang Cai,&nbsp;Xingyu Xu,&nbsp;Tomas Balezentis,&nbsp;Z. Y. Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12053-023-10136-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Most of empirical studies assume convex production technology to analyze productivity growth at the aggregate level. However, convexity assumption implies benchmarking against production plans that are not empirically observed. Unlike previous studies, we adopt a non-convex approach based on observed input–output combinations, which requires minimal assumptions in terms of production technology. Incorporating energy and carbon emissions into the production function, this paper investigates green growth and its driving forces among 39 European countries over 1991–2019. A by-production technology is applied alongside the environmental Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen (LHM) productivity indicator and directional distance functions. The results show that the production technology has been expanding (i.e., technical progress), whereas scale inefficiency led to the negative green total factor productivity (TFP) growth in Europe. At the group level, green TFP in OECD countries tends to increase, whereas a sharp decline is observed for non-OECD countries. Furthermore, we note that human capital, R&amp;D intensity, energy consumption structure, and urbanization level all have significant positive impacts on green TFP growth in Europe, especially for non-OECD countries. The corresponding policy implications are derived to promote regional cooperation and technology sharing.\\n</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Efficiency\",\"volume\":\"16 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Efficiency\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-023-10136-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-023-10136-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实证研究大多采用凸生产技术来分析总体水平上的生产率增长。然而,凸性假设意味着对没有经验观察到的生产计划进行基准测试。与之前的研究不同,我们采用了基于观察到的投入产出组合的非凸方法,这在生产技术方面需要最小的假设。本文将能源和碳排放纳入生产函数,对1991-2019年欧洲39个国家的绿色增长及其驱动力进行了研究。副产技术与环境Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen (LHM)生产力指标和定向距离函数一起应用。研究结果表明,生产技术不断扩大(即技术进步),而规模无效率导致欧洲绿色全要素生产率(TFP)负增长。在集团一级,经合发组织国家的绿色全要素生产率趋于增加,而非经合发组织国家则急剧下降。此外,我们注意到人力资本、研发强度、能源消费结构和城市化水平都对欧洲绿色全要素生产率增长有显著的正向影响,尤其是对非经合组织国家。由此得出相应的政策影响,以促进区域合作和技术共享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Green productivity evolution under non-convex environmental technology

Most of empirical studies assume convex production technology to analyze productivity growth at the aggregate level. However, convexity assumption implies benchmarking against production plans that are not empirically observed. Unlike previous studies, we adopt a non-convex approach based on observed input–output combinations, which requires minimal assumptions in terms of production technology. Incorporating energy and carbon emissions into the production function, this paper investigates green growth and its driving forces among 39 European countries over 1991–2019. A by-production technology is applied alongside the environmental Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen (LHM) productivity indicator and directional distance functions. The results show that the production technology has been expanding (i.e., technical progress), whereas scale inefficiency led to the negative green total factor productivity (TFP) growth in Europe. At the group level, green TFP in OECD countries tends to increase, whereas a sharp decline is observed for non-OECD countries. Furthermore, we note that human capital, R&D intensity, energy consumption structure, and urbanization level all have significant positive impacts on green TFP growth in Europe, especially for non-OECD countries. The corresponding policy implications are derived to promote regional cooperation and technology sharing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.
期刊最新文献
A step towards energy efficiency in G7 countries: analyzing the role of economic complexity and shadow economy on energy intensity Pathways to commercial building plug and process load efficiency and control Wind-driven and buoyancy effects for modeling natural ventilation in buildings at urban scale A mixed-method approach to study the impacts of energy micro-generation combined with appliance-level feedback on everyday practices Do environment-related technologies, urbanization, trade openness, and income impact energy consumption and intensity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1