OneCeph头颅测量分析在不同屏幕尺寸设备上应用的可靠性

IF 0.1 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Archives of Orofacial Science Pub Date : 2022-06-23 DOI:10.21315/aos2022.1701.oa09
Pimsiri Kanpittaya
{"title":"OneCeph头颅测量分析在不同屏幕尺寸设备上应用的可靠性","authors":"Pimsiri Kanpittaya","doi":"10.21315/aos2022.1701.oa09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to assess the reliability of the OneCeph application according to personal computer (PC), tablet and smartphone screen size in comparison with Dolphin software on PC as a gold standard. Cephalometric landmarks were identified on 100 digital radiographs. Twenty-four cephalometric measurements were made with Dolphin software as a gold standard comparing with OneCeph application on smartphone (OS), OneCeph on PC (OP) and OneCeph on tablet (OT). All measurements were repeated after four weeks for intra-examiner reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). One-way ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis test were done for measurement comparison between methods (Dolphin, OS, OP and OT). Results for OneCeph on smartphone and tablet, 21 measurements were comparable with Dolphin while other three (NLA, H-angle and UL to S-plane) were not. In OneCeph on PC, 20 measurements were comparable with Dolphin while other four (NLA, H-angle, U1 to A-point and UL to S-plane) were not. All different measurements were clinically insignificant except H-angle. Intra-examiner reliability represented ICC above 0.9. In conclusion, OneCeph application on three different screen size is reliable to use for cephalometric measurement. Most of the measurements are comparable with gold standard and adequate to be utilised in clinical routine. OneCeph on smartphone and tablet are advantageous from the portable feature over PC.","PeriodicalId":44961,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orofacial Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of OneCeph Cephalometric Analysis Application on the Devices with Different Screen Size\",\"authors\":\"Pimsiri Kanpittaya\",\"doi\":\"10.21315/aos2022.1701.oa09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to assess the reliability of the OneCeph application according to personal computer (PC), tablet and smartphone screen size in comparison with Dolphin software on PC as a gold standard. Cephalometric landmarks were identified on 100 digital radiographs. Twenty-four cephalometric measurements were made with Dolphin software as a gold standard comparing with OneCeph application on smartphone (OS), OneCeph on PC (OP) and OneCeph on tablet (OT). All measurements were repeated after four weeks for intra-examiner reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). One-way ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis test were done for measurement comparison between methods (Dolphin, OS, OP and OT). Results for OneCeph on smartphone and tablet, 21 measurements were comparable with Dolphin while other three (NLA, H-angle and UL to S-plane) were not. In OneCeph on PC, 20 measurements were comparable with Dolphin while other four (NLA, H-angle, U1 to A-point and UL to S-plane) were not. All different measurements were clinically insignificant except H-angle. Intra-examiner reliability represented ICC above 0.9. In conclusion, OneCeph application on three different screen size is reliable to use for cephalometric measurement. Most of the measurements are comparable with gold standard and adequate to be utilised in clinical routine. OneCeph on smartphone and tablet are advantageous from the portable feature over PC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orofacial Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orofacial Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21315/aos2022.1701.oa09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orofacial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/aos2022.1701.oa09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估OneCeph应用程序的可靠性,根据个人电脑(PC),平板电脑和智能手机的屏幕尺寸,并将PC上的Dolphin软件作为黄金标准进行比较。在100张数字x线片上确定了头颅测量标志。以Dolphin软件为金标准,对OneCeph在智能手机(OS)、PC (OP)和平板电脑(OT)上的OneCeph应用程序进行24次头部测量。所有的测量在四周后重复进行,以测量考官内部的信度和类内相关系数(ICC)。采用单因素方差分析和Kruskal Wallis检验对方法(Dolphin、OS、OP和OT)进行计量比较。结果显示,OneCeph在智能手机和平板电脑上的21个测量值与Dolphin具有可比性,而其他3个测量值(NLA, h角和UL到s面)与Dolphin没有可比性。在PC上的OneCeph中,有20个测量值与Dolphin具有可比性,而其他4个测量值(NLA, h角,U1到a点和UL到s面)则没有可比性。除h角外,其他测量值均无临床意义。审查员内部信度表示ICC大于0.9。总之,OneCeph应用程序在三种不同的屏幕尺寸是可靠的用于头测量。大多数测量结果与金标准相当,足以用于临床常规。OneCeph在智能手机和平板电脑上的便携功能比PC更有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of OneCeph Cephalometric Analysis Application on the Devices with Different Screen Size
This study aimed to assess the reliability of the OneCeph application according to personal computer (PC), tablet and smartphone screen size in comparison with Dolphin software on PC as a gold standard. Cephalometric landmarks were identified on 100 digital radiographs. Twenty-four cephalometric measurements were made with Dolphin software as a gold standard comparing with OneCeph application on smartphone (OS), OneCeph on PC (OP) and OneCeph on tablet (OT). All measurements were repeated after four weeks for intra-examiner reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). One-way ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis test were done for measurement comparison between methods (Dolphin, OS, OP and OT). Results for OneCeph on smartphone and tablet, 21 measurements were comparable with Dolphin while other three (NLA, H-angle and UL to S-plane) were not. In OneCeph on PC, 20 measurements were comparable with Dolphin while other four (NLA, H-angle, U1 to A-point and UL to S-plane) were not. All different measurements were clinically insignificant except H-angle. Intra-examiner reliability represented ICC above 0.9. In conclusion, OneCeph application on three different screen size is reliable to use for cephalometric measurement. Most of the measurements are comparable with gold standard and adequate to be utilised in clinical routine. OneCeph on smartphone and tablet are advantageous from the portable feature over PC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Orofacial Science
Archives of Orofacial Science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Salvage Mandibulectomy in an Octogenarian with Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report Histopathologic Changes in Dental Follicle Associated with Radiographically Normal Impacted Lower Third Molars The Key Role of Interleukin-17A/Interleukin-17RA in Bone Metabolism and Diseases: A Review An Enhanced Version of Sample Size Calculator, Scalex SP Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans of Parotid Region: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1