关于邪恶问题的信念和解决方案的相关性

IF 1.3 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Mental Health Religion & Culture Pub Date : 2023-02-07 DOI:10.1080/13674676.2023.2219633
A. Furnham, Charlotte L. Robinson
{"title":"关于邪恶问题的信念和解决方案的相关性","authors":"A. Furnham, Charlotte L. Robinson","doi":"10.1080/13674676.2023.2219633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study explored people’s attitudes towards various explanations for the theological Problem of Evil. Five hundred adults rated the importance of 16 possible solutions to the Problem of Evil. Participants also indicated their religious and political beliefs, their Belief in a Just World and their endorsement of Conspiracy Theories. Results showed that many differences in ratings were a function of religious beliefs and belief in the afterlife. The 16 solutions were subjected to a factor analysis which revealed three factors labelled Deistic, Luck and Chance, and Human Behaviour. Those who claimed to be more religious, and believed in an afterlife, were more likely to support Deistic solutions. These solutions were also supported by younger, less educated, and less intelligent people who believed in the Just World and Conspiracy theories. Just World beliefs were related to Luck/Chance explanations, whereas believing in Conspiracy theories related to Human Behaviour explanations.","PeriodicalId":47614,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Religion & Culture","volume":"26 1","pages":"182 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlates of beliefs about, and solutions to, the problem of evil\",\"authors\":\"A. Furnham, Charlotte L. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13674676.2023.2219633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study explored people’s attitudes towards various explanations for the theological Problem of Evil. Five hundred adults rated the importance of 16 possible solutions to the Problem of Evil. Participants also indicated their religious and political beliefs, their Belief in a Just World and their endorsement of Conspiracy Theories. Results showed that many differences in ratings were a function of religious beliefs and belief in the afterlife. The 16 solutions were subjected to a factor analysis which revealed three factors labelled Deistic, Luck and Chance, and Human Behaviour. Those who claimed to be more religious, and believed in an afterlife, were more likely to support Deistic solutions. These solutions were also supported by younger, less educated, and less intelligent people who believed in the Just World and Conspiracy theories. Just World beliefs were related to Luck/Chance explanations, whereas believing in Conspiracy theories related to Human Behaviour explanations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental Health Religion & Culture\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"182 - 193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental Health Religion & Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2023.2219633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Religion & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2023.2219633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究探讨了人们对神学“邪恶问题”的各种解释的态度。500名成年人对邪恶问题的16种可能解决方案的重要性进行了评分。与会者还表示了他们的宗教和政治信仰、对公正世界的信仰以及对阴谋论的支持。结果表明,评分的许多差异是宗教信仰和对来生的信仰的函数。对这16个解决方案进行了因素分析,揭示了三个因素,即自然神论、运气和偶然性以及人类行为。那些声称更虔诚、相信来生的人更有可能支持自然神论的解决方案。这些解决方案也得到了信奉正义世界和阴谋论的年轻、受教育程度较低、智力较低的人的支持。正义世界的信仰与幸运/偶然的解释有关,而阴谋论的信仰与人类行为的解释有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correlates of beliefs about, and solutions to, the problem of evil
ABSTRACT This study explored people’s attitudes towards various explanations for the theological Problem of Evil. Five hundred adults rated the importance of 16 possible solutions to the Problem of Evil. Participants also indicated their religious and political beliefs, their Belief in a Just World and their endorsement of Conspiracy Theories. Results showed that many differences in ratings were a function of religious beliefs and belief in the afterlife. The 16 solutions were subjected to a factor analysis which revealed three factors labelled Deistic, Luck and Chance, and Human Behaviour. Those who claimed to be more religious, and believed in an afterlife, were more likely to support Deistic solutions. These solutions were also supported by younger, less educated, and less intelligent people who believed in the Just World and Conspiracy theories. Just World beliefs were related to Luck/Chance explanations, whereas believing in Conspiracy theories related to Human Behaviour explanations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Exploring the factor structure of the adolescent form of the Francis Psychological Type and Emotional Temperament Scales (FPTETSA) among Canadian Baptist youth: full form and short form Mindfulness and mystical experiences in Sufis and non-Sufis Validity and reliability of the Arabic Fear of COVID-19 Scale in Lebanese people during the pandemic Strengthening spiritual and cultural approaches in managing mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic The development and validation of the COVID-19 Depression Scale (COVID-19DS): association with the Perceived Health-Related Components Scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1