老年性耳聋:老年性耳聋患者听觉脑干反应(ABR)与纯音听力学(PTA)的比较

Ouaye Jp, Fan Xt, Mahulu Em, J. Xiao, Maloko Lh, Wang Xw, Xu At
{"title":"老年性耳聋:老年性耳聋患者听觉脑干反应(ABR)与纯音听力学(PTA)的比较","authors":"Ouaye Jp, Fan Xt, Mahulu Em, J. Xiao, Maloko Lh, Wang Xw, Xu At","doi":"10.37532/jor.2019.8(1).367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Presbycusis is a complex phenomenon resulting from an elevation hearing levels as well as changes in auditory processing. Chronic diseases such as diabetes (D), arterial hypertension (H) may act as an accelerating factor in agerelated degeneration of the auditory system. The most used diagnostic test is PTA, ABR is recorded when the pure tone audiometry cannot be access. \n \nObjective: to compare the relation between ABR and PTA threshold in presbycusis patients and evaluate the influence of diabetes and/or hypertension on the relationship between ABR and PTA threshold. \n \nMaterial and methods: This is a prospective hospital-based study on the comparison between ABR and PTA of presbycusis patients (≥ 50 years old) composed of 35 females and 21 males. The participants were divided into groups, set as follows group 1 composed of 21 patients, group 2 comprising 12 patients, group 3 made of 14 patients and group 4 composed of 9 patients. \n \nResults: The comparison between the mean threshold difference of ABR and PTA in group I and II was significant at each frequency with the mean difference in decibel was 20 dB at 0.5 and 1 kHz in group 2,while in group 2 a mean difference 20 dB at 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz. However, group IV showed no significant difference between ABR and PTA thresholds, the mean threshold difference was>20 dB at each frequency. \n \nConclusion: it was found that there is a positive relationship between ABR and PTA, threshold, which appear to be insignificant in presbycusis patients with both hypertension and diabetes; this may be probably related to synergic effects of the two chronic illnesses on the cochlea.","PeriodicalId":90613,"journal":{"name":"Journal of otology & rhinology","volume":"2019 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Presbycusis: Comparison between the Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) and the Pure Tone Audiometry (PTA) in Presbycusis Patient\",\"authors\":\"Ouaye Jp, Fan Xt, Mahulu Em, J. Xiao, Maloko Lh, Wang Xw, Xu At\",\"doi\":\"10.37532/jor.2019.8(1).367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Presbycusis is a complex phenomenon resulting from an elevation hearing levels as well as changes in auditory processing. Chronic diseases such as diabetes (D), arterial hypertension (H) may act as an accelerating factor in agerelated degeneration of the auditory system. The most used diagnostic test is PTA, ABR is recorded when the pure tone audiometry cannot be access. \\n \\nObjective: to compare the relation between ABR and PTA threshold in presbycusis patients and evaluate the influence of diabetes and/or hypertension on the relationship between ABR and PTA threshold. \\n \\nMaterial and methods: This is a prospective hospital-based study on the comparison between ABR and PTA of presbycusis patients (≥ 50 years old) composed of 35 females and 21 males. The participants were divided into groups, set as follows group 1 composed of 21 patients, group 2 comprising 12 patients, group 3 made of 14 patients and group 4 composed of 9 patients. \\n \\nResults: The comparison between the mean threshold difference of ABR and PTA in group I and II was significant at each frequency with the mean difference in decibel was 20 dB at 0.5 and 1 kHz in group 2,while in group 2 a mean difference 20 dB at 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz. However, group IV showed no significant difference between ABR and PTA thresholds, the mean threshold difference was>20 dB at each frequency. \\n \\nConclusion: it was found that there is a positive relationship between ABR and PTA, threshold, which appear to be insignificant in presbycusis patients with both hypertension and diabetes; this may be probably related to synergic effects of the two chronic illnesses on the cochlea.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of otology & rhinology\",\"volume\":\"2019 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of otology & rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37532/jor.2019.8(1).367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of otology & rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37532/jor.2019.8(1).367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年性耳聋是一种复杂的现象,由听力水平的提高以及听觉处理的变化引起。糖尿病(D)、动脉高压(H)等慢性疾病可能是听觉系统年龄相关退化的加速因素。最常用的诊断测试是PTA,当纯音听力计无法访问时记录ABR。目的:比较老年人ABR与PTA阈值的关系,评价糖尿病和/或高血压对ABR与PTA阈值关系的影响。材料和方法:这是一项基于医院的前瞻性研究,对35名女性和21名男性组成的老年性耳聋患者(≥50岁)的ABR和PTA进行比较。参与者被分为几组,第一组由21名患者组成,第二组由12名患者组成、第三组由14名患者组成和第四组由9名患者组成。结果:第一组和第二组ABR和PTA的平均阈值差异在每个频率下都很显著,第二组在0.5和1kHz时的分贝平均差异为20dB,而第二组则在0.5、1kHz和2kHz时的平均差异为2dB。然而,IV组ABR和PTA阈值之间没有显著差异,每个频率的平均阈值差异>20dB。结论:ABR与PTA、阈值呈正相关,在合并高血压和糖尿病的老年性耳聋患者中不明显;这可能与这两种慢性疾病对耳蜗的协同作用有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Presbycusis: Comparison between the Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) and the Pure Tone Audiometry (PTA) in Presbycusis Patient
Background: Presbycusis is a complex phenomenon resulting from an elevation hearing levels as well as changes in auditory processing. Chronic diseases such as diabetes (D), arterial hypertension (H) may act as an accelerating factor in agerelated degeneration of the auditory system. The most used diagnostic test is PTA, ABR is recorded when the pure tone audiometry cannot be access. Objective: to compare the relation between ABR and PTA threshold in presbycusis patients and evaluate the influence of diabetes and/or hypertension on the relationship between ABR and PTA threshold. Material and methods: This is a prospective hospital-based study on the comparison between ABR and PTA of presbycusis patients (≥ 50 years old) composed of 35 females and 21 males. The participants were divided into groups, set as follows group 1 composed of 21 patients, group 2 comprising 12 patients, group 3 made of 14 patients and group 4 composed of 9 patients. Results: The comparison between the mean threshold difference of ABR and PTA in group I and II was significant at each frequency with the mean difference in decibel was 20 dB at 0.5 and 1 kHz in group 2,while in group 2 a mean difference 20 dB at 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz. However, group IV showed no significant difference between ABR and PTA thresholds, the mean threshold difference was>20 dB at each frequency. Conclusion: it was found that there is a positive relationship between ABR and PTA, threshold, which appear to be insignificant in presbycusis patients with both hypertension and diabetes; this may be probably related to synergic effects of the two chronic illnesses on the cochlea.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Anomalous Case of Nasal Septal Cyst with Cholesterol Granulomas: A Case Report Otosclerosis in a Sub-Saharan Zone in Mali The Association of Nasal Septal Deviation with Solitary Sphenoidal Fungus Ball: Retrospective Analysis of 43 Patients Ludwig’s Angina: An Absolute Compulsion of Hospital Tarry Highlights of the Otorhinolaryngology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1