托马斯·默里,弗吉尼亚·森克森和安娜·杰克逊,日本纺织公司

IF 0.5 2区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEXTILE HISTORY Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00404969.2020.1741214
L. Millar
{"title":"托马斯·默里,弗吉尼亚·森克森和安娜·杰克逊,日本纺织公司","authors":"L. Millar","doi":"10.1080/00404969.2020.1741214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"emerges of Alexandra’s agency and talent for choosing garments both appropriate for the occasion and individual in taste. Chapter 2 examines Alexandra’s engagement and marriage, where the frugality of her Danish childhood was evident in the assembling of clothes for the wedding and trousseau. Here close object study demonstrates its rewards: while outwardly conforming to the need to wear clothing of British manufacture, Alexandra also inserted a personal good luck charm — some gifted lace of European manufacture — inside the dress. Chapter 3 analyses Alexandra’s evening and court dresses, showing how, both in colour and decoration, their evolution mirrored changes in her personal life; for example, the change from bright to muted colours following the death of her eldest son, Albert Victor. Chapter 4 explores Alexandra’s travel outfits, highlighting the hybrid outfits that incorporated elements of local clothing traditions into her own clothing, sometimes for comfort and practicality, sometimes for diplomacy; for example, when Alexandra visited Ireland she wore dresses made from green fabric and decorated with shamrocks. The theme of dressing for effect recurs in Chapter 5, which addresses Alexandra’s fancy-dress clothing. Strasdin suggests that her propensity to appear as a queen — Mary Queen of Scots for the 1871 Waverley Ball and Marguerite Valois for the 1897 Devonshire Ball — demonstrates a subversive streak, playing at queen while still a queen-in-waiting. Equally fascinating is the exploration of what Strasdin terms ‘like dressing’, adopted by Alexandra and her sister Dagmar for the latter’s visit in 1873, when the two chose a series of identical garments to highlight their sisterly affection and offer a performance of kinship and imperial ties. Chapter 6 considers Alexandra’s contributions to fashion through her collaborations with tailors, including her role in the rising fortunes of Isle of Wight tailor John Redfern. Queen Victoria is the first royal to spring to mind when thinking of mourning dress, but Chapter 7’s discussion of Alexandra’s mourning clothing reminds us that Queen Victoria was not setting a trend but rather amplifying and personifying a well-established tradition. The distinction between the clothes worn by Victoria, queen in her own right, and Alexandra as a queen consort, recurs in Chapter 8’s analysis of coronation robes. The chapter also demonstrates Alexandra’s involvement in design choices, such as the mantle’s all-over embroidery, which followed Danish, rather than British, tradition. The book contains a good mixture of coloured plates, many of which illustrate surviving garments, and black and white images, although, as with other books in the Bloomsbury Dress and Fashion Research Series, they leave the reader desiring more. The index contains some oddities that might hinder a reader searching for particular references (‘sumptuous lace’ under ‘s’, rather than ‘lace’ under ‘l’; ‘woven plaid shawl’ under ‘w’, rather than ‘shawl’ under ‘s’). In general, however, this book more than fulfils its title’s promise, taking us deep into the royal wardrobe and providing an invaluable source for any researcher of royal dress.","PeriodicalId":43311,"journal":{"name":"TEXTILE HISTORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00404969.2020.1741214","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thomas Murray, with Virginia Soenksen and Anna Jackson, Textiles of Japan\",\"authors\":\"L. Millar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00404969.2020.1741214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"emerges of Alexandra’s agency and talent for choosing garments both appropriate for the occasion and individual in taste. Chapter 2 examines Alexandra’s engagement and marriage, where the frugality of her Danish childhood was evident in the assembling of clothes for the wedding and trousseau. Here close object study demonstrates its rewards: while outwardly conforming to the need to wear clothing of British manufacture, Alexandra also inserted a personal good luck charm — some gifted lace of European manufacture — inside the dress. Chapter 3 analyses Alexandra’s evening and court dresses, showing how, both in colour and decoration, their evolution mirrored changes in her personal life; for example, the change from bright to muted colours following the death of her eldest son, Albert Victor. Chapter 4 explores Alexandra’s travel outfits, highlighting the hybrid outfits that incorporated elements of local clothing traditions into her own clothing, sometimes for comfort and practicality, sometimes for diplomacy; for example, when Alexandra visited Ireland she wore dresses made from green fabric and decorated with shamrocks. The theme of dressing for effect recurs in Chapter 5, which addresses Alexandra’s fancy-dress clothing. Strasdin suggests that her propensity to appear as a queen — Mary Queen of Scots for the 1871 Waverley Ball and Marguerite Valois for the 1897 Devonshire Ball — demonstrates a subversive streak, playing at queen while still a queen-in-waiting. Equally fascinating is the exploration of what Strasdin terms ‘like dressing’, adopted by Alexandra and her sister Dagmar for the latter’s visit in 1873, when the two chose a series of identical garments to highlight their sisterly affection and offer a performance of kinship and imperial ties. Chapter 6 considers Alexandra’s contributions to fashion through her collaborations with tailors, including her role in the rising fortunes of Isle of Wight tailor John Redfern. Queen Victoria is the first royal to spring to mind when thinking of mourning dress, but Chapter 7’s discussion of Alexandra’s mourning clothing reminds us that Queen Victoria was not setting a trend but rather amplifying and personifying a well-established tradition. The distinction between the clothes worn by Victoria, queen in her own right, and Alexandra as a queen consort, recurs in Chapter 8’s analysis of coronation robes. The chapter also demonstrates Alexandra’s involvement in design choices, such as the mantle’s all-over embroidery, which followed Danish, rather than British, tradition. The book contains a good mixture of coloured plates, many of which illustrate surviving garments, and black and white images, although, as with other books in the Bloomsbury Dress and Fashion Research Series, they leave the reader desiring more. The index contains some oddities that might hinder a reader searching for particular references (‘sumptuous lace’ under ‘s’, rather than ‘lace’ under ‘l’; ‘woven plaid shawl’ under ‘w’, rather than ‘shawl’ under ‘s’). In general, however, this book more than fulfils its title’s promise, taking us deep into the royal wardrobe and providing an invaluable source for any researcher of royal dress.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TEXTILE HISTORY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00404969.2020.1741214\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TEXTILE HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00404969.2020.1741214\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEXTILE HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00404969.2020.1741214","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亚历山德拉在选择既适合场合又适合个人品味的服装方面的代理能力和天赋脱颖而出。第2章考察了亚历山德拉的订婚和婚姻,在那里,她的丹麦童年的节俭在婚礼和嫁妆的组装中表现得很明显。在这里,近距离研究证明了它的回报:虽然外表上符合穿着英国制造的衣服的需要,但亚历山德拉还在裙子里插入了一个个人好运符——一些欧洲制造的天才蕾丝。第三章分析了亚历山德拉的晚礼服和宫廷礼服,展示了它们在颜色和装饰上的演变如何反映了她个人生活的变化;例如,在她的长子阿尔伯特·维克多去世后,颜色从明亮变为柔和。第4章探讨了亚历山德拉的旅行服装,强调了将当地服装传统元素融入她自己服装中的混合服装,有时是为了舒适和实用,有时是出于外交目的;例如,当亚历山德拉访问爱尔兰时,她穿着绿色织物制成的连衣裙,上面装饰着三叶草。在第五章中,穿着效果的主题再次出现,该章讲述了亚历山德拉的奇装异服。斯特拉斯丁认为,她以女王的身份出现的倾向——1871年韦弗利舞会上的苏格兰玛丽女王和1897年德文郡舞会上的玛格丽特·瓦卢瓦——展示了一种颠覆性的倾向,在女王的身份下扮演女王。同样令人着迷的是对斯特拉斯丁所说的“喜欢的穿着”的探索,这是亚历山德拉和她的妹妹达格玛在1873年访问斯特拉斯丁时采用的,当时两人选择了一系列相同的服装来突出他们的姐妹情谊,并表现出亲属关系和帝国关系。第6章考虑了亚历山德拉通过与裁缝的合作对时尚的贡献,包括她在怀特岛裁缝约翰·雷德芬财富增长中所扮演的角色。维多利亚女王是第一个想到丧服的王室成员,但第七章对亚历山德拉丧服的讨论提醒我们,维多利亚女王并没有引领潮流,而是放大和人格化了一个既定的传统。在第8章对加冕礼长袍的分析中,再次出现了女王维多利亚和王后亚历山德拉所穿衣服的区别。本章还展示了亚历山德拉对设计选择的参与,比如斗篷的全刺绣,它遵循了丹麦而非英国的传统。这本书包含了彩色盘子和黑白图像的完美组合,其中许多盘子展示了幸存的服装,尽管与布鲁姆斯伯里服装与时尚研究系列的其他书籍一样,它们让读者渴望更多。该索引包含一些可能会阻碍读者搜索特定参考文献的奇怪之处(“s”下的“无数蕾丝”,而不是“l”下的”蕾丝“;“w”下的'编织格子披肩',而不是”s“下的”披肩“)。然而,总的来说,这本书不仅实现了书名的承诺,还带我们深入王室衣橱,为任何王室服饰研究者提供了宝贵的资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thomas Murray, with Virginia Soenksen and Anna Jackson, Textiles of Japan
emerges of Alexandra’s agency and talent for choosing garments both appropriate for the occasion and individual in taste. Chapter 2 examines Alexandra’s engagement and marriage, where the frugality of her Danish childhood was evident in the assembling of clothes for the wedding and trousseau. Here close object study demonstrates its rewards: while outwardly conforming to the need to wear clothing of British manufacture, Alexandra also inserted a personal good luck charm — some gifted lace of European manufacture — inside the dress. Chapter 3 analyses Alexandra’s evening and court dresses, showing how, both in colour and decoration, their evolution mirrored changes in her personal life; for example, the change from bright to muted colours following the death of her eldest son, Albert Victor. Chapter 4 explores Alexandra’s travel outfits, highlighting the hybrid outfits that incorporated elements of local clothing traditions into her own clothing, sometimes for comfort and practicality, sometimes for diplomacy; for example, when Alexandra visited Ireland she wore dresses made from green fabric and decorated with shamrocks. The theme of dressing for effect recurs in Chapter 5, which addresses Alexandra’s fancy-dress clothing. Strasdin suggests that her propensity to appear as a queen — Mary Queen of Scots for the 1871 Waverley Ball and Marguerite Valois for the 1897 Devonshire Ball — demonstrates a subversive streak, playing at queen while still a queen-in-waiting. Equally fascinating is the exploration of what Strasdin terms ‘like dressing’, adopted by Alexandra and her sister Dagmar for the latter’s visit in 1873, when the two chose a series of identical garments to highlight their sisterly affection and offer a performance of kinship and imperial ties. Chapter 6 considers Alexandra’s contributions to fashion through her collaborations with tailors, including her role in the rising fortunes of Isle of Wight tailor John Redfern. Queen Victoria is the first royal to spring to mind when thinking of mourning dress, but Chapter 7’s discussion of Alexandra’s mourning clothing reminds us that Queen Victoria was not setting a trend but rather amplifying and personifying a well-established tradition. The distinction between the clothes worn by Victoria, queen in her own right, and Alexandra as a queen consort, recurs in Chapter 8’s analysis of coronation robes. The chapter also demonstrates Alexandra’s involvement in design choices, such as the mantle’s all-over embroidery, which followed Danish, rather than British, tradition. The book contains a good mixture of coloured plates, many of which illustrate surviving garments, and black and white images, although, as with other books in the Bloomsbury Dress and Fashion Research Series, they leave the reader desiring more. The index contains some oddities that might hinder a reader searching for particular references (‘sumptuous lace’ under ‘s’, rather than ‘lace’ under ‘l’; ‘woven plaid shawl’ under ‘w’, rather than ‘shawl’ under ‘s’). In general, however, this book more than fulfils its title’s promise, taking us deep into the royal wardrobe and providing an invaluable source for any researcher of royal dress.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TEXTILE HISTORY
TEXTILE HISTORY HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Textile History is an internationally recognised, peer reviewed journal and one of the leading publications in its field. It is viewed as an important outlet for current research. Published in the spring and autumn of each year, its remit has always been to facilitate the publication of high-quality research and discussion in all aspects of scholarship arising from the history of textiles and dress. Since its foundation the scope of the journal has been substantially expanded to include articles dealing with aspects of the cultural and social history of apparel and textiles, as well as issues arising from the exhibition, preservation and interpretation of historic textiles or clothing.
期刊最新文献
The Production and Trade of Hand-Knitted Wool Stockings in Elizabethan and Early Jacobean England (c. 1580–c. 1617) A Set of Liturgical Vestments and Textiles Made for the Requiem Mass in the Early Eighteenth Century Redrafting Domestic Life: Women Textile Designers and New Professional Enterprises in Early 1970s Britain Early Twentieth-Century Nottingham Lace Curtains: An Ideal Window Furnishing ‘Zoom Into This Embroidered Panel for a Cabinet Door’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1