{"title":"使青少年性健康和生殖健康及权利的人权和社会规范保持一致","authors":"A. Buller, M. Schulte","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2018.1542914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 10th of December 2018 marks the 70th anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations (UN) General Assembly. On the 20th November, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) reached its 29th anniversary. In September, 24 years had passed since the International Conference on Population and Development in Cairo introduced the term sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) and declared SRHR as a fundamental human right, including for adolescents. Only three years ago, all UN Member States adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development that included a specific target for achieving universal access to SRHR (Gender Equality Goal 5). Despite these important efforts to create consensus around human rights frameworks and steps to secure universal access to SRHR, the promise of child rights and adolescent girls’ and boys’ evolving capacities to claim SRH rights remains unrealised. For instance, a recent review of evidence on the SRHR of adolescent girls highlighted that many lowand middle-income countries have not yet made significant progress in delaying marriage and childbearing, reducing unwanted childbearing, or narrowing socioeconomic, health and gender gaps that could reduce girls’ risks of adverse adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights (ASRHR) outcomes and related health effects over the life course. Multiple converging factors contribute to an ongoing lack of prioritisation of SRHR, which is defined, following the recent Guttmacher-Lancet report (see Panel 1), as a “... state of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being in relation to all aspects of sexuality and reproduction, not merely the absence of disease, dysfunction, or infirmity”. However, ASRHR is seemingly often relegated to a lower priority or is entirely absent from discussions on SRHR. Barriers to international and local prioritisation of (A)SRHR range from global political and economic trends, such as the shift towards farright and populist politics in high-income countries and in regions that push international health policy and aid investment toward the bottom of foreign policy agendas, to local inequitable social norms that define social expectations for adolescents boys’ and girls’ behaviours according to restrictive, binary gender roles and identities.","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 1","pages":"38 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2018.1542914","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aligning human rights and social norms for adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights\",\"authors\":\"A. Buller, M. Schulte\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09688080.2018.1542914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 10th of December 2018 marks the 70th anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations (UN) General Assembly. On the 20th November, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) reached its 29th anniversary. In September, 24 years had passed since the International Conference on Population and Development in Cairo introduced the term sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) and declared SRHR as a fundamental human right, including for adolescents. Only three years ago, all UN Member States adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development that included a specific target for achieving universal access to SRHR (Gender Equality Goal 5). Despite these important efforts to create consensus around human rights frameworks and steps to secure universal access to SRHR, the promise of child rights and adolescent girls’ and boys’ evolving capacities to claim SRH rights remains unrealised. For instance, a recent review of evidence on the SRHR of adolescent girls highlighted that many lowand middle-income countries have not yet made significant progress in delaying marriage and childbearing, reducing unwanted childbearing, or narrowing socioeconomic, health and gender gaps that could reduce girls’ risks of adverse adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights (ASRHR) outcomes and related health effects over the life course. Multiple converging factors contribute to an ongoing lack of prioritisation of SRHR, which is defined, following the recent Guttmacher-Lancet report (see Panel 1), as a “... state of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being in relation to all aspects of sexuality and reproduction, not merely the absence of disease, dysfunction, or infirmity”. However, ASRHR is seemingly often relegated to a lower priority or is entirely absent from discussions on SRHR. Barriers to international and local prioritisation of (A)SRHR range from global political and economic trends, such as the shift towards farright and populist politics in high-income countries and in regions that push international health policy and aid investment toward the bottom of foreign policy agendas, to local inequitable social norms that define social expectations for adolescents boys’ and girls’ behaviours according to restrictive, binary gender roles and identities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Health Matters\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"38 - 45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2018.1542914\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Health Matters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1542914\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health Matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1542914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Aligning human rights and social norms for adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights
The 10th of December 2018 marks the 70th anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations (UN) General Assembly. On the 20th November, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) reached its 29th anniversary. In September, 24 years had passed since the International Conference on Population and Development in Cairo introduced the term sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) and declared SRHR as a fundamental human right, including for adolescents. Only three years ago, all UN Member States adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development that included a specific target for achieving universal access to SRHR (Gender Equality Goal 5). Despite these important efforts to create consensus around human rights frameworks and steps to secure universal access to SRHR, the promise of child rights and adolescent girls’ and boys’ evolving capacities to claim SRH rights remains unrealised. For instance, a recent review of evidence on the SRHR of adolescent girls highlighted that many lowand middle-income countries have not yet made significant progress in delaying marriage and childbearing, reducing unwanted childbearing, or narrowing socioeconomic, health and gender gaps that could reduce girls’ risks of adverse adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights (ASRHR) outcomes and related health effects over the life course. Multiple converging factors contribute to an ongoing lack of prioritisation of SRHR, which is defined, following the recent Guttmacher-Lancet report (see Panel 1), as a “... state of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being in relation to all aspects of sexuality and reproduction, not merely the absence of disease, dysfunction, or infirmity”. However, ASRHR is seemingly often relegated to a lower priority or is entirely absent from discussions on SRHR. Barriers to international and local prioritisation of (A)SRHR range from global political and economic trends, such as the shift towards farright and populist politics in high-income countries and in regions that push international health policy and aid investment toward the bottom of foreign policy agendas, to local inequitable social norms that define social expectations for adolescents boys’ and girls’ behaviours according to restrictive, binary gender roles and identities.
期刊介绍:
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters ( SRHM) promotes sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) globally through its journal and ''more than a journal'' activities. The Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters (SRHM) journal, formerly Reproductive Health Matters (RHM), is a peer-reviewed, international journal that explores emerging, neglected and marginalised topics and themes across the field of sexual and reproductive health and rights. It aims to publish original, relevant, and contemporary research, particularly from a feminist perspective, that can help inform the development of policies, laws and services to fulfil the rights and meet the sexual and reproductive health needs of people of all ages, gender identities and sexual orientations. SRHM publishes work that engages with fundamental dilemmas and debates in SRHR, highlighting multiple perspectives, acknowledging differences, and searching for new forms of consensus. SRHM strongly encourages research that explores experiences, values, information and issues from the point of view of those whose lives are affected. Key topics addressed in SRHM include (but are not limited to) abortion, family planning, contraception, female genital mutilation, HIV and other STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV), maternal health, SRHR in humanitarian settings, gender-based violence, young people, gender, sexuality and sexual rights.