使青少年性健康和生殖健康及权利的人权和社会规范保持一致

A. Buller, M. Schulte
{"title":"使青少年性健康和生殖健康及权利的人权和社会规范保持一致","authors":"A. Buller, M. Schulte","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2018.1542914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 10th of December 2018 marks the 70th anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations (UN) General Assembly. On the 20th November, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) reached its 29th anniversary. In September, 24 years had passed since the International Conference on Population and Development in Cairo introduced the term sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) and declared SRHR as a fundamental human right, including for adolescents. Only three years ago, all UN Member States adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development that included a specific target for achieving universal access to SRHR (Gender Equality Goal 5). Despite these important efforts to create consensus around human rights frameworks and steps to secure universal access to SRHR, the promise of child rights and adolescent girls’ and boys’ evolving capacities to claim SRH rights remains unrealised. For instance, a recent review of evidence on the SRHR of adolescent girls highlighted that many lowand middle-income countries have not yet made significant progress in delaying marriage and childbearing, reducing unwanted childbearing, or narrowing socioeconomic, health and gender gaps that could reduce girls’ risks of adverse adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights (ASRHR) outcomes and related health effects over the life course. Multiple converging factors contribute to an ongoing lack of prioritisation of SRHR, which is defined, following the recent Guttmacher-Lancet report (see Panel 1), as a “... state of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being in relation to all aspects of sexuality and reproduction, not merely the absence of disease, dysfunction, or infirmity”. However, ASRHR is seemingly often relegated to a lower priority or is entirely absent from discussions on SRHR. Barriers to international and local prioritisation of (A)SRHR range from global political and economic trends, such as the shift towards farright and populist politics in high-income countries and in regions that push international health policy and aid investment toward the bottom of foreign policy agendas, to local inequitable social norms that define social expectations for adolescents boys’ and girls’ behaviours according to restrictive, binary gender roles and identities.","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 1","pages":"38 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2018.1542914","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aligning human rights and social norms for adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights\",\"authors\":\"A. Buller, M. Schulte\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09688080.2018.1542914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 10th of December 2018 marks the 70th anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations (UN) General Assembly. On the 20th November, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) reached its 29th anniversary. In September, 24 years had passed since the International Conference on Population and Development in Cairo introduced the term sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) and declared SRHR as a fundamental human right, including for adolescents. Only three years ago, all UN Member States adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development that included a specific target for achieving universal access to SRHR (Gender Equality Goal 5). Despite these important efforts to create consensus around human rights frameworks and steps to secure universal access to SRHR, the promise of child rights and adolescent girls’ and boys’ evolving capacities to claim SRH rights remains unrealised. For instance, a recent review of evidence on the SRHR of adolescent girls highlighted that many lowand middle-income countries have not yet made significant progress in delaying marriage and childbearing, reducing unwanted childbearing, or narrowing socioeconomic, health and gender gaps that could reduce girls’ risks of adverse adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights (ASRHR) outcomes and related health effects over the life course. Multiple converging factors contribute to an ongoing lack of prioritisation of SRHR, which is defined, following the recent Guttmacher-Lancet report (see Panel 1), as a “... state of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being in relation to all aspects of sexuality and reproduction, not merely the absence of disease, dysfunction, or infirmity”. However, ASRHR is seemingly often relegated to a lower priority or is entirely absent from discussions on SRHR. Barriers to international and local prioritisation of (A)SRHR range from global political and economic trends, such as the shift towards farright and populist politics in high-income countries and in regions that push international health policy and aid investment toward the bottom of foreign policy agendas, to local inequitable social norms that define social expectations for adolescents boys’ and girls’ behaviours according to restrictive, binary gender roles and identities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Health Matters\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"38 - 45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2018.1542914\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Health Matters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1542914\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health Matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1542914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

2018年12月10日是联合国大会通过《世界人权宣言》70周年。11月20日,联合国《儿童权利公约》通过29周年。9月,自开罗国际人口与发展会议提出性健康和生殖健康及权利一词并宣布性健康和生殖健康及权利是一项基本人权,包括青少年的基本人权以来,已经过去了24年。就在三年前,所有联合国会员国通过了《2030年可持续发展议程》,其中包括实现普遍获得性和生殖健康权利的具体目标(性别平等目标5)。尽管这些重要努力围绕人权框架和步骤达成共识,以确保普遍获得性和生殖健康权利,但儿童权利的承诺以及青春期女孩和男孩不断发展的要求性和生殖健康权利的能力仍未实现。例如,最近对少女性健康和生殖健康状况证据的审查突出表明,许多低收入和中等收入国家在推迟结婚和生育、减少非自愿生育或缩小社会经济、健康和性别差距方面尚未取得重大进展,而这些差距可能会降低女孩一生中遭受青少年性健康和生殖健康及权利不利后果的风险以及相关的健康影响。多种趋同因素导致SRHR持续缺乏优先考虑,根据最近的Guttmacher-Lancet报告(见小组1),SRHR被定义为“……与性和生殖的所有方面有关的身体、情感、精神和社会福利状态,而不仅仅是没有疾病、功能障碍或虚弱"。然而,ASRHR似乎经常被降级到较低的优先级,或者在SRHR的讨论中完全缺席。阻碍国际和地方确定(A)性别和性别风险优先事项的障碍包括全球政治和经济趋势,如高收入国家和区域向极右和民粹主义政治的转变,将国际卫生政策和援助投资推向外交政策议程的最底层,以及当地不公平的社会规范,根据限制性的二元性别角色和身份定义对青少年男孩和女孩行为的社会期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aligning human rights and social norms for adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights
The 10th of December 2018 marks the 70th anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations (UN) General Assembly. On the 20th November, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) reached its 29th anniversary. In September, 24 years had passed since the International Conference on Population and Development in Cairo introduced the term sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) and declared SRHR as a fundamental human right, including for adolescents. Only three years ago, all UN Member States adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development that included a specific target for achieving universal access to SRHR (Gender Equality Goal 5). Despite these important efforts to create consensus around human rights frameworks and steps to secure universal access to SRHR, the promise of child rights and adolescent girls’ and boys’ evolving capacities to claim SRH rights remains unrealised. For instance, a recent review of evidence on the SRHR of adolescent girls highlighted that many lowand middle-income countries have not yet made significant progress in delaying marriage and childbearing, reducing unwanted childbearing, or narrowing socioeconomic, health and gender gaps that could reduce girls’ risks of adverse adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights (ASRHR) outcomes and related health effects over the life course. Multiple converging factors contribute to an ongoing lack of prioritisation of SRHR, which is defined, following the recent Guttmacher-Lancet report (see Panel 1), as a “... state of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being in relation to all aspects of sexuality and reproduction, not merely the absence of disease, dysfunction, or infirmity”. However, ASRHR is seemingly often relegated to a lower priority or is entirely absent from discussions on SRHR. Barriers to international and local prioritisation of (A)SRHR range from global political and economic trends, such as the shift towards farright and populist politics in high-income countries and in regions that push international health policy and aid investment toward the bottom of foreign policy agendas, to local inequitable social norms that define social expectations for adolescents boys’ and girls’ behaviours according to restrictive, binary gender roles and identities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters ( SRHM) promotes sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) globally through its journal and ''more than a journal'' activities. The Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters (SRHM) journal, formerly Reproductive Health Matters (RHM), is a peer-reviewed, international journal that explores emerging, neglected and marginalised topics and themes across the field of sexual and reproductive health and rights. It aims to publish original, relevant, and contemporary research, particularly from a feminist perspective, that can help inform the development of policies, laws and services to fulfil the rights and meet the sexual and reproductive health needs of people of all ages, gender identities and sexual orientations. SRHM publishes work that engages with fundamental dilemmas and debates in SRHR, highlighting multiple perspectives, acknowledging differences, and searching for new forms of consensus. SRHM strongly encourages research that explores experiences, values, information and issues from the point of view of those whose lives are affected. Key topics addressed in SRHM include (but are not limited to) abortion, family planning, contraception, female genital mutilation, HIV and other STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV), maternal health, SRHR in humanitarian settings, gender-based violence, young people, gender, sexuality and sexual rights.
期刊最新文献
4 Code Work: RAI-MDS, Measurement, Quality, and Work Organization in Long-Term Care Facilities in Ontario 1 Introduction 2 The Dematerialization of Fundamental Nursing Care in an Era of Managerial Reform 11 Seeking Disability Politics in Disability and Health-Related Non-profit Organizations 13 Nail Salons, Toxics, and Health: Organizing for a Better Work Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1