集中评论;关于CLSI抗菌药物断点的修订,2018-2021

Q4 Immunology and Microbiology Journal of Bacteriology and Virology Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.4167/jbv.2022.52.2.041
Jeong-Weon Yoon
{"title":"集中评论;关于CLSI抗菌药物断点的修订,2018-2021","authors":"Jeong-Weon Yoon","doi":"10.4167/jbv.2022.52.2.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and limitations of new breakpoints with a review of large study data. In addition, I reviewed problems associated with each antimicrobial breakpoint and made suggestions for how they might be improved, for example, increasing or decreasing the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or zone diameter, deleting or adding an S, I, or R category, introducing new concepts (such as susceptible-dose dependent (SDD)), and requesting more evaluation methods. Conclusions; CLSI annually publishes guidelines for antimicrobial resistance tests. I reviewed problems associated with each antimicrobial breakpoint for last 4 years, and made suggestions for how they might be improved. limitations pneumoniae , by whole genome sequencing. With increased MICs, monitoring of this horizontally transferable gene and breakpoint reevaluation in isolates, including isolates with MICs greater than 0.25 μg/mL , are needed. The clinical association with this transferable gene is also needed to be evaluated on a larger cohort. ceftolozane/tazobactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam inhibit ESBL, CRE or CRPA. Avibactam or vaborbactam reduces the MIC of β-lactam drugs by several fold, showing an effect on ESBL, AmpC, or KPC; however, it has no effect on metallo-β-lactamase, oxa-type β-lactamase, or resistance to porin mutation (38). As an antimicrobial resistance detection method, the disk diffusion method of ceftazidime/avibactam or imipenem/relebactam has low categorical agreement compared to reference broth microdilution in CRE isolates and it overcalls resistance (39-41). Therefore, reevaluation of the disk diffusion method is required. The E-test of imipenem/relebactam categorical agreement was > 90%; however, the E-test showed a one-grade high MIC result. Therefore, isolates with an E-test MIC of 2–4 μg/mL should be retested with broth microdilution to reduce major or minor errors. The resistance to β-lactam combination agents is transferred by conjugation, with the possibility of horizontal transfer of low-level resistance in CRE and CRPA, and the resistance mechanism of β-lactam combination agents should be detected using whole genome sequencing.","PeriodicalId":39739,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bacteriology and Virology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Focused Commentary; About Revision of CLSI Antimicrobial Breakpoints, 2018-2021\",\"authors\":\"Jeong-Weon Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.4167/jbv.2022.52.2.041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"and limitations of new breakpoints with a review of large study data. In addition, I reviewed problems associated with each antimicrobial breakpoint and made suggestions for how they might be improved, for example, increasing or decreasing the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or zone diameter, deleting or adding an S, I, or R category, introducing new concepts (such as susceptible-dose dependent (SDD)), and requesting more evaluation methods. Conclusions; CLSI annually publishes guidelines for antimicrobial resistance tests. I reviewed problems associated with each antimicrobial breakpoint for last 4 years, and made suggestions for how they might be improved. limitations pneumoniae , by whole genome sequencing. With increased MICs, monitoring of this horizontally transferable gene and breakpoint reevaluation in isolates, including isolates with MICs greater than 0.25 μg/mL , are needed. The clinical association with this transferable gene is also needed to be evaluated on a larger cohort. ceftolozane/tazobactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam inhibit ESBL, CRE or CRPA. Avibactam or vaborbactam reduces the MIC of β-lactam drugs by several fold, showing an effect on ESBL, AmpC, or KPC; however, it has no effect on metallo-β-lactamase, oxa-type β-lactamase, or resistance to porin mutation (38). As an antimicrobial resistance detection method, the disk diffusion method of ceftazidime/avibactam or imipenem/relebactam has low categorical agreement compared to reference broth microdilution in CRE isolates and it overcalls resistance (39-41). Therefore, reevaluation of the disk diffusion method is required. The E-test of imipenem/relebactam categorical agreement was > 90%; however, the E-test showed a one-grade high MIC result. Therefore, isolates with an E-test MIC of 2–4 μg/mL should be retested with broth microdilution to reduce major or minor errors. The resistance to β-lactam combination agents is transferred by conjugation, with the possibility of horizontal transfer of low-level resistance in CRE and CRPA, and the resistance mechanism of β-lactam combination agents should be detected using whole genome sequencing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bacteriology and Virology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bacteriology and Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4167/jbv.2022.52.2.041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Immunology and Microbiology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bacteriology and Virology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4167/jbv.2022.52.2.041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以及新断点的局限性以及对大量研究数据的回顾。此外,我回顾了与每个抗菌断点相关的问题,并就如何改进这些问题提出了建议,例如,增加或减少最小抑制浓度(MIC)或区域直径,删除或添加S、I或R类别,引入新概念(如易感剂量依赖性(SDD)),并要求更多的评估方法。结论;CLSI每年发布抗微生物耐药性测试指南。我回顾了过去4年中与每个抗菌断点相关的问题,并提出了如何改进这些问题的建议。肺炎的局限性,通过全基因组测序。随着MIC的增加,需要监测这种水平可转移基因,并对分离株(包括MIC大于0.25μg/mL的分离株)进行断点重新评估。与这种可转移基因的临床相关性也需要在更大的队列中进行评估。头孢妥洛扎内/他唑巴坦、美罗培南/伐博巴坦和亚胺培南/雷巴坦抑制ESBL、CRE或CRPA。阿维巴坦或伐博坦可将β-内酰胺类药物的MIC降低数倍,对ESBL、AmpC或KPC有影响;然而,它对金属β-内酰胺酶、oxa型β-内酶或对孔蛋白突变的耐药性没有影响(38)。作为一种抗微生物耐药性检测方法,在CRE分离株中,与参考肉汤微量稀释相比,头孢他啶/阿维巴坦或亚胺培南/雷巴坦的圆盘扩散法具有较低的分类一致性,并且它覆盖了耐药性(39-41)。因此,需要对圆盘扩散法进行重新评估。亚胺培南/雷巴坦分类一致性E检验>90%;然而,E测试显示出一个等级的高MIC结果。因此,应使用肉汤微量稀释法对E试验MIC为2-4μg/mL的分离株进行重新测试,以减少主要或次要错误。对β-内酰胺联合制剂的耐药性是通过偶联转移的,CRE和CRPA中的低水平耐药性有可能水平转移,应使用全基因组测序来检测β-内胺联合制剂的耐药机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Focused Commentary; About Revision of CLSI Antimicrobial Breakpoints, 2018-2021
and limitations of new breakpoints with a review of large study data. In addition, I reviewed problems associated with each antimicrobial breakpoint and made suggestions for how they might be improved, for example, increasing or decreasing the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or zone diameter, deleting or adding an S, I, or R category, introducing new concepts (such as susceptible-dose dependent (SDD)), and requesting more evaluation methods. Conclusions; CLSI annually publishes guidelines for antimicrobial resistance tests. I reviewed problems associated with each antimicrobial breakpoint for last 4 years, and made suggestions for how they might be improved. limitations pneumoniae , by whole genome sequencing. With increased MICs, monitoring of this horizontally transferable gene and breakpoint reevaluation in isolates, including isolates with MICs greater than 0.25 μg/mL , are needed. The clinical association with this transferable gene is also needed to be evaluated on a larger cohort. ceftolozane/tazobactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam inhibit ESBL, CRE or CRPA. Avibactam or vaborbactam reduces the MIC of β-lactam drugs by several fold, showing an effect on ESBL, AmpC, or KPC; however, it has no effect on metallo-β-lactamase, oxa-type β-lactamase, or resistance to porin mutation (38). As an antimicrobial resistance detection method, the disk diffusion method of ceftazidime/avibactam or imipenem/relebactam has low categorical agreement compared to reference broth microdilution in CRE isolates and it overcalls resistance (39-41). Therefore, reevaluation of the disk diffusion method is required. The E-test of imipenem/relebactam categorical agreement was > 90%; however, the E-test showed a one-grade high MIC result. Therefore, isolates with an E-test MIC of 2–4 μg/mL should be retested with broth microdilution to reduce major or minor errors. The resistance to β-lactam combination agents is transferred by conjugation, with the possibility of horizontal transfer of low-level resistance in CRE and CRPA, and the resistance mechanism of β-lactam combination agents should be detected using whole genome sequencing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bacteriology and Virology
Journal of Bacteriology and Virology Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Plazomicin—a New Aminoglycoside—for Treating Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Trends in Norovirus Distribution among the Children of Childcare Center Intestinal Organoid as a Research Platform for the Virus-host Interaction Distribution and Transmission of Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates Co-resistant to Colistin and Carbapenem in Gangwon Province, South Korea Antiviral Activity of Flavonoids Against Non-polio Enteroviruses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1