数字符号对人类感知经验的解释

D. Barner
{"title":"数字符号对人类感知经验的解释","authors":"D. Barner","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/d4jca","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why did humans develop precise systems for measuring experience, like numbers, clocks, andcalendars? I argue that precise representational systems were constructed by earlier generationsof humans because they recognized that their noisy perceptual systems were not capturingdistinctions that existed in the world. Abstract symbolic systems did not arise from perceptualrepresentations, but instead were constructed to describe and explain perceptual experience. Byanalogy, I argue that when children learn number words, they do not rely on noisy perceptualsystems, but instead acquire these words as units in a broader system of procedures, whosemeanings are ultimately defined by logical relations to one another, not perception.","PeriodicalId":44229,"journal":{"name":"Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Symbols as Explanations of Human Perceptual Experience\",\"authors\":\"D. Barner\",\"doi\":\"10.31234/osf.io/d4jca\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Why did humans develop precise systems for measuring experience, like numbers, clocks, andcalendars? I argue that precise representational systems were constructed by earlier generationsof humans because they recognized that their noisy perceptual systems were not capturingdistinctions that existed in the world. Abstract symbolic systems did not arise from perceptualrepresentations, but instead were constructed to describe and explain perceptual experience. Byanalogy, I argue that when children learn number words, they do not rely on noisy perceptualsystems, but instead acquire these words as units in a broader system of procedures, whosemeanings are ultimately defined by logical relations to one another, not perception.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/d4jca\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/d4jca","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为什么人类会发展出精确的系统来测量经验,比如数字、时钟和日历?我认为,精确的表征系统是由前几代人类构建的,因为他们认识到,他们嘈杂的感知系统无法捕捉到世界上存在的差异。抽象符号系统并不是由感知表征产生的,而是用来描述和解释感知经验的。通过类比,我认为当儿童学习数字单词时,他们不依赖于嘈杂的感知系统,而是在更广泛的程序系统中作为单元来获得这些单词,这些单词的含义最终是由彼此之间的逻辑关系而不是感知来定义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Numerical Symbols as Explanations of Human Perceptual Experience
Why did humans develop precise systems for measuring experience, like numbers, clocks, andcalendars? I argue that precise representational systems were constructed by earlier generationsof humans because they recognized that their noisy perceptual systems were not capturingdistinctions that existed in the world. Abstract symbolic systems did not arise from perceptualrepresentations, but instead were constructed to describe and explain perceptual experience. Byanalogy, I argue that when children learn number words, they do not rely on noisy perceptualsystems, but instead acquire these words as units in a broader system of procedures, whosemeanings are ultimately defined by logical relations to one another, not perception.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology
Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Connecting Language Acquisition and Language Evolution A Very Long Look Back at Language Development The Role of Prenatal Experience and Basic Auditory Mechanisms in the Development of Language Building a Communication System in Infancy Infant Speech Perception
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1