混合层模型比较的有限时间集成方法

IF 2.8 2区 地球科学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY Journal of Physical Oceanography Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI:10.1175/jpo-d-22-0107.1
L. Johnson, B. Fox‐Kemper, Qing Li, H. Pham, S. Sarkar
{"title":"混合层模型比较的有限时间集成方法","authors":"L. Johnson, B. Fox‐Kemper, Qing Li, H. Pham, S. Sarkar","doi":"10.1175/jpo-d-22-0107.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis work evaluates the fidelity of various upper ocean turbulence parameterizations subject to realistic monsoon forcing and presents a finite-time ensemble vector (EV) method to better manage the design and numerical principles of these parameterizations. The EV method emphasizes the dynamics of a turbulence closure multi-model ensemble and is applied to evaluate ten different ocean surface boundary layer (OSBL) parameterizations within a single column (SC) model against two boundary layer large eddy simulations (LES). Both LES include realistic surface forcing, but one includes wind-driven shear turbulence only, while the other includes additional Stokes forcing through the wave-average equations that generates Langmuir turbulence. The finite-time EV framework focuses on what constitutes the local behavior of the mixed layer dynamical system and isolates the forcing and ocean state conditions where turbulence parameterizations most disagree. Identifying disagreement provides the potential to evaluate SC models comparatively against the LES. Observations collected during the 2018 Monsoon onset in the Bay of Bengal provide a case study to evaluate models under realistic and variable forcing conditions. The case study results highlight two regimes where models disagree a) during wind-driven deepening of the mixed layer and b) under strong diurnal forcing.","PeriodicalId":56115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical Oceanography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Finite-Time Ensemble Method for Mixed Layer Model Comparison\",\"authors\":\"L. Johnson, B. Fox‐Kemper, Qing Li, H. Pham, S. Sarkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/jpo-d-22-0107.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis work evaluates the fidelity of various upper ocean turbulence parameterizations subject to realistic monsoon forcing and presents a finite-time ensemble vector (EV) method to better manage the design and numerical principles of these parameterizations. The EV method emphasizes the dynamics of a turbulence closure multi-model ensemble and is applied to evaluate ten different ocean surface boundary layer (OSBL) parameterizations within a single column (SC) model against two boundary layer large eddy simulations (LES). Both LES include realistic surface forcing, but one includes wind-driven shear turbulence only, while the other includes additional Stokes forcing through the wave-average equations that generates Langmuir turbulence. The finite-time EV framework focuses on what constitutes the local behavior of the mixed layer dynamical system and isolates the forcing and ocean state conditions where turbulence parameterizations most disagree. Identifying disagreement provides the potential to evaluate SC models comparatively against the LES. Observations collected during the 2018 Monsoon onset in the Bay of Bengal provide a case study to evaluate models under realistic and variable forcing conditions. The case study results highlight two regimes where models disagree a) during wind-driven deepening of the mixed layer and b) under strong diurnal forcing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physical Oceanography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physical Oceanography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-22-0107.1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-22-0107.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这项工作评估了在现实季风强迫下各种上层海洋湍流参数化的保真度,并提出了一种有限时间集成矢量(EV)方法,以更好地管理这些参数化的设计和数值原理。EV方法强调湍流闭合多模型系综的动力学,并用于评估单柱(SC)模型内的十种不同海洋表面边界层(OSBL)参数化与两个边界层大涡模拟(LES)。两个LES都包括真实的表面强迫,但其中一个仅包括风驱动的剪切湍流,而另一个包括通过生成朗缪尔湍流的波平均方程的额外斯托克斯强迫。有限时间EV框架专注于混合层动力系统的局部行为的构成,并隔离了湍流参数化最不一致的强迫和海况条件。识别分歧提供了将SC模型与LES进行比较评估的可能性。2018年孟加拉湾季风爆发期间收集的观测结果提供了一个案例研究,用于评估现实和可变强迫条件下的模型。案例研究结果强调了两种模式不一致的情况:a)在风驱动的混合层加深过程中,以及b)在强日强迫下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Finite-Time Ensemble Method for Mixed Layer Model Comparison
This work evaluates the fidelity of various upper ocean turbulence parameterizations subject to realistic monsoon forcing and presents a finite-time ensemble vector (EV) method to better manage the design and numerical principles of these parameterizations. The EV method emphasizes the dynamics of a turbulence closure multi-model ensemble and is applied to evaluate ten different ocean surface boundary layer (OSBL) parameterizations within a single column (SC) model against two boundary layer large eddy simulations (LES). Both LES include realistic surface forcing, but one includes wind-driven shear turbulence only, while the other includes additional Stokes forcing through the wave-average equations that generates Langmuir turbulence. The finite-time EV framework focuses on what constitutes the local behavior of the mixed layer dynamical system and isolates the forcing and ocean state conditions where turbulence parameterizations most disagree. Identifying disagreement provides the potential to evaluate SC models comparatively against the LES. Observations collected during the 2018 Monsoon onset in the Bay of Bengal provide a case study to evaluate models under realistic and variable forcing conditions. The case study results highlight two regimes where models disagree a) during wind-driven deepening of the mixed layer and b) under strong diurnal forcing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Oceanography (JPO) (ISSN: 0022-3670; eISSN: 1520-0485) publishes research related to the physics of the ocean and to processes operating at its boundaries. Observational, theoretical, and modeling studies are all welcome, especially those that focus on elucidating specific physical processes. Papers that investigate interactions with other components of the Earth system (e.g., ocean–atmosphere, physical–biological, and physical–chemical interactions) as well as studies of other fluid systems (e.g., lakes and laboratory tanks) are also invited, as long as their focus is on understanding the ocean or its role in the Earth system.
期刊最新文献
Why is the Westward Rossby Wave Propagation from the California Coast “Too Fast”? Observations of Parametric Subharmonic Instability of Diurnal Internal Tides in the Northwest Pacific Imprint of chaos on the ocean energy cycle from an eddying North Atlantic ensemble Interpreting Negative IOD Events Based on the Transfer Routes of Wave Energy in the Upper Ocean On the Pathways of Wind-Driven Coastal Upwelling: Nonlinear Momentum Flux and Baroclinic Instability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1