爱尔兰自由与英国民主:第三次爱尔兰地方自治危机,1909 - 1914。詹姆斯·多尔蒂著。308页。科克:科克大学出版社,2019。€39。

IF 0.3 1区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1017/ihs.2022.17
N. Fleming
{"title":"爱尔兰自由与英国民主:第三次爱尔兰地方自治危机,1909 - 1914。詹姆斯·多尔蒂著。308页。科克:科克大学出版社,2019。€39。","authors":"N. Fleming","doi":"10.1017/ihs.2022.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"bers of society. Even though the onset of war in 1914 and radicalisation of Irish nationalism leading to the 1916 Rising divided the suffrage movement, Hayden did not mind whether enfranchisement of women was awarded by a Westminster or Dublin parliament. When the bill was passed in London in 1918, Hayden and Hanna Sheehy Skeffington among others, were identified by a journalist as accompanying the pioneering suffragist Anna Haslam to the polling station. During the 1920s and 1930s, Hayden’s professional life expanded in U.C.D. Publishing articles and book reviews, her sole history book, A short history of the Irish people, written with George A. Moonan, was published in 1921. The authors made no claim to originality and admitted it was written from a nationalist perspective. It became the main school and college textbook into the 1960s. Hayden also remained a commanding figure within political and public circles. She accepted the Anglo-Irish Treaty (1921) and William T. Cosgrave’s government but was among the few women who opposed the ‘reactionary and paternalist’ (p. 278) positions of the Cosgrave and then Éamon de Valera governments towards women. She campaigned against legislation that undermined women’s citizenship rights, particularly their right to sit on juries, and restrictions that affected women’s employment and career prospects. Hayden favoured the participation of women in the formulation of public policy because it would bring new insights into discussions about all aspects of national life. Hayden is probably best known for her opposition to articles 40, 41, and 45 concerning the status of women in the 1937 constitution. Padbury details her prominent role as leader of the National University of Ireland Women Graduates Association (N.U.W.G.A.) in the highprofile campaign to secure amendments not just to the above articles but also articles 9 on citizenship and 16 on voting rights in the draft constitution. The N.U.W.G.A. and other female deputations secured a significant amendment to articles 9 and 16 with the inclusion of the phrase ‘without distinction of sex’ (p. 295) but failed to secure any amendment or deletion of the other articles. After her retirement in 1938 she continued working with the poor and was active on behalf of women graduates. She remained a scholar and feminist through to her death in 1942. This short review does not do justice to Padbury’s industrious mining of the fifty-nine volumes of Hayden’s diaries and papers and all the other attendant collections and secondary sources, to present what another reviewer correctly called a ‘page-turner’ of a book. Reading this elegantly-written biography bringsMary Hayden to life as a public intellectual and scholar with conflicted emotions and feelings, while providing the reader with fascinating and new information on a woman who sought and found her own identity and agency. Mary Hayden must be considered a central figure in the formation of twentieth century Ireland just as much as any military or political figure.","PeriodicalId":44187,"journal":{"name":"IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Irish liberty and British democracy: the third Irish home rule crisis, 1909–14. By James Doherty. Pp. 308. Cork: Cork University Press. 2019. €39.\",\"authors\":\"N. Fleming\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ihs.2022.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"bers of society. Even though the onset of war in 1914 and radicalisation of Irish nationalism leading to the 1916 Rising divided the suffrage movement, Hayden did not mind whether enfranchisement of women was awarded by a Westminster or Dublin parliament. When the bill was passed in London in 1918, Hayden and Hanna Sheehy Skeffington among others, were identified by a journalist as accompanying the pioneering suffragist Anna Haslam to the polling station. During the 1920s and 1930s, Hayden’s professional life expanded in U.C.D. Publishing articles and book reviews, her sole history book, A short history of the Irish people, written with George A. Moonan, was published in 1921. The authors made no claim to originality and admitted it was written from a nationalist perspective. It became the main school and college textbook into the 1960s. Hayden also remained a commanding figure within political and public circles. She accepted the Anglo-Irish Treaty (1921) and William T. Cosgrave’s government but was among the few women who opposed the ‘reactionary and paternalist’ (p. 278) positions of the Cosgrave and then Éamon de Valera governments towards women. She campaigned against legislation that undermined women’s citizenship rights, particularly their right to sit on juries, and restrictions that affected women’s employment and career prospects. Hayden favoured the participation of women in the formulation of public policy because it would bring new insights into discussions about all aspects of national life. Hayden is probably best known for her opposition to articles 40, 41, and 45 concerning the status of women in the 1937 constitution. Padbury details her prominent role as leader of the National University of Ireland Women Graduates Association (N.U.W.G.A.) in the highprofile campaign to secure amendments not just to the above articles but also articles 9 on citizenship and 16 on voting rights in the draft constitution. The N.U.W.G.A. and other female deputations secured a significant amendment to articles 9 and 16 with the inclusion of the phrase ‘without distinction of sex’ (p. 295) but failed to secure any amendment or deletion of the other articles. After her retirement in 1938 she continued working with the poor and was active on behalf of women graduates. She remained a scholar and feminist through to her death in 1942. This short review does not do justice to Padbury’s industrious mining of the fifty-nine volumes of Hayden’s diaries and papers and all the other attendant collections and secondary sources, to present what another reviewer correctly called a ‘page-turner’ of a book. Reading this elegantly-written biography bringsMary Hayden to life as a public intellectual and scholar with conflicted emotions and feelings, while providing the reader with fascinating and new information on a woman who sought and found her own identity and agency. Mary Hayden must be considered a central figure in the formation of twentieth century Ireland just as much as any military or political figure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ihs.2022.17\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ihs.2022.17","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会成员。尽管1914年战争的爆发和1916年爱尔兰民族主义的激进化导致了选举权运动的分裂,但海登并不介意女性选举权是由威斯敏斯特议会还是都柏林议会授予的。1918年,当该法案在伦敦通过时,一名记者确认海登和汉娜·希·斯凯芬顿等人陪同女权运动先驱安娜·哈斯拉姆前往投票站。在20世纪20年代和30年代,海登的职业生涯在U.C.D.出版文章和书评,她与乔治·A·穆南合著的唯一一本历史书《爱尔兰人民简史》于1921年出版。作者们没有声称这本书具有独创性,并承认这本书是从民族主义的角度写的。它成为20世纪60年代学校和大学的主要教材。海登在政界和公众圈子里仍然是一位举足轻重的人物。她接受了《英爱条约》(1921年)和威廉·T·科斯格雷夫政府,但她是少数反对科斯格雷夫和当时的埃蒙·德瓦莱拉政府对妇女的“反动和家长式”立场(第278页)的女性之一。她反对损害妇女公民权利的立法,特别是她们参加陪审团的权利,以及影响妇女就业和职业前景的限制。海登赞成妇女参与公共政策的制定,因为这将为有关国家生活各个方面的讨论带来新的见解。海登最出名的可能是她反对1937年宪法中关于妇女地位的第40、41和45条。帕德伯里详细介绍了她作为爱尔兰国立大学女毕业生协会(N.U.W.G.A.)领导人在这场高调的运动中所发挥的重要作用,该运动旨在确保不仅对上述条款进行修正,而且对宪法草案中关于公民身份的第9条和关于投票权的第16条进行修正。N.U.W.G.A.和其他女性代表团对第9条和第16条进行了重大修订,加入了“不分性别”一词(第295页),但未能对其他条款进行任何修订或删除。1938年退休后,她继续为穷人工作,并积极代表女性毕业生。她一直是一位学者和女权主义者,直到1942年去世。这篇简短的评论并没有公正地评价帕德伯里对59卷海登日记和论文以及所有其他相关收藏和次要来源的勤奋挖掘,以呈现另一位评论家正确地称之为一本书的“翻页器”。阅读这本文笔优美的传记,让玛丽·海登成为一名情绪和情感冲突的公共知识分子和学者,同时为读者提供了关于一位寻求并找到自己身份和代理的女性的迷人而新的信息。玛丽·海登和任何军事或政治人物一样,必须被视为二十世纪爱尔兰形成的核心人物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Irish liberty and British democracy: the third Irish home rule crisis, 1909–14. By James Doherty. Pp. 308. Cork: Cork University Press. 2019. €39.
bers of society. Even though the onset of war in 1914 and radicalisation of Irish nationalism leading to the 1916 Rising divided the suffrage movement, Hayden did not mind whether enfranchisement of women was awarded by a Westminster or Dublin parliament. When the bill was passed in London in 1918, Hayden and Hanna Sheehy Skeffington among others, were identified by a journalist as accompanying the pioneering suffragist Anna Haslam to the polling station. During the 1920s and 1930s, Hayden’s professional life expanded in U.C.D. Publishing articles and book reviews, her sole history book, A short history of the Irish people, written with George A. Moonan, was published in 1921. The authors made no claim to originality and admitted it was written from a nationalist perspective. It became the main school and college textbook into the 1960s. Hayden also remained a commanding figure within political and public circles. She accepted the Anglo-Irish Treaty (1921) and William T. Cosgrave’s government but was among the few women who opposed the ‘reactionary and paternalist’ (p. 278) positions of the Cosgrave and then Éamon de Valera governments towards women. She campaigned against legislation that undermined women’s citizenship rights, particularly their right to sit on juries, and restrictions that affected women’s employment and career prospects. Hayden favoured the participation of women in the formulation of public policy because it would bring new insights into discussions about all aspects of national life. Hayden is probably best known for her opposition to articles 40, 41, and 45 concerning the status of women in the 1937 constitution. Padbury details her prominent role as leader of the National University of Ireland Women Graduates Association (N.U.W.G.A.) in the highprofile campaign to secure amendments not just to the above articles but also articles 9 on citizenship and 16 on voting rights in the draft constitution. The N.U.W.G.A. and other female deputations secured a significant amendment to articles 9 and 16 with the inclusion of the phrase ‘without distinction of sex’ (p. 295) but failed to secure any amendment or deletion of the other articles. After her retirement in 1938 she continued working with the poor and was active on behalf of women graduates. She remained a scholar and feminist through to her death in 1942. This short review does not do justice to Padbury’s industrious mining of the fifty-nine volumes of Hayden’s diaries and papers and all the other attendant collections and secondary sources, to present what another reviewer correctly called a ‘page-turner’ of a book. Reading this elegantly-written biography bringsMary Hayden to life as a public intellectual and scholar with conflicted emotions and feelings, while providing the reader with fascinating and new information on a woman who sought and found her own identity and agency. Mary Hayden must be considered a central figure in the formation of twentieth century Ireland just as much as any military or political figure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: This journal is published jointly by the Irish Historical Society and the Ulster Society for Irish Historical Studies. Published twice a year, Irish Historical Studies covers all areas of Irish history, including the medieval period. We thank William E. Vaughn of the management committee of Irish Historical Studies for his permission to republish the following two articles.
期刊最新文献
The impact of military demobilisation on rising Irish migration to London, c.1750–1850 The pope, a knight and a bishop on the edge of Christendom: the politics of exclusion in thirteenth-century Ireland Colonialist intervention in a metropolitan revolution: reconsidering A remonstrance of divers remarkeable passages Ethnographic collections in Northern Ireland and the Solomon Islands tomako (canoe) at the Ulster Museum, 1898–2023 The Weaver Street bombing in Belfast 1922: violence, politics and memory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1