多发性硬化症患者痉挛的识别、描述和变异性以及临床与患者对话的潜在障碍:来自大规模自我报告调查的SEEN-MSS的结果

Q1 Nursing International journal of MS care Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-11 DOI:10.7224/1537-2073.2022-115
Ben Thrower, Scott D Newsome, Barry Hendin, Sherry Danese, Jenifer Patterson, Robert Chinnapongse
{"title":"多发性硬化症患者痉挛的识别、描述和变异性以及临床与患者对话的潜在障碍:来自大规模自我报告调查的SEEN-MSS的结果","authors":"Ben Thrower, Scott D Newsome, Barry Hendin, Sherry Danese, Jenifer Patterson, Robert Chinnapongse","doi":"10.7224/1537-2073.2022-115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The experience with spasticity varies among individuals with multiple sclerosis and spasticity (MSS), as they may not recognize it as spasticity or have the language to describe their symptoms. This can lead to potential delays in diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Symptoms and Emotions Exploration Needed in Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity was an online survey completed by 1177 individuals with MSS in 2021. It sought to capture symptoms of spasticity, variability of symptoms, specific spasticity triggers, and how conversations with physicians were initiated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the cohort was 56.8 years and it was 78% women. Prior to spasticity onset, 65% of respondents felt minimally prepared or unprepared for possibly developing spasticity and were unaware that spasticity manifests as part of MS. Eighty percent experienced spasticity daily, which was variable in severity and duration. Spasticity was triggered by a range of factors and 90% of those surveyed were unable to predict when it would occur or its severity. Day-to-day variability of spasticity prevented 65% of respondents from doing things they wished to do. Sixty percent were confused by their symptoms, not recognizing them as spasticity. Although 91% reported experiencing muscle spasms, only 69% used \"muscle spasms\" to describe their symptoms. Other descriptors included \"muscle tightness,\" \"stiffness,\" \"cramping,\" and \"pain.\" After recognizing spasticity, 78% proactively initiated discussions with their physicians, 52% wished they had done so sooner, and 42% delayed the conversation by up to or more than a year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results emphasize the variable nature of spasticity and the lack of a common language to describe symptoms, underscoring the importance of education, earlier recognition, and customized treatments tailored to the severity and duration of spasticity symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":14150,"journal":{"name":"International journal of MS care","volume":" ","pages":"75-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10930809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recognition, Description, and Variability of Spasticity in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis and Potential Barriers to Clinician-Patient Dialogue: Results From SEEN-MSS, a Large-Scale, Self-Reported Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Ben Thrower, Scott D Newsome, Barry Hendin, Sherry Danese, Jenifer Patterson, Robert Chinnapongse\",\"doi\":\"10.7224/1537-2073.2022-115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The experience with spasticity varies among individuals with multiple sclerosis and spasticity (MSS), as they may not recognize it as spasticity or have the language to describe their symptoms. This can lead to potential delays in diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Symptoms and Emotions Exploration Needed in Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity was an online survey completed by 1177 individuals with MSS in 2021. It sought to capture symptoms of spasticity, variability of symptoms, specific spasticity triggers, and how conversations with physicians were initiated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the cohort was 56.8 years and it was 78% women. Prior to spasticity onset, 65% of respondents felt minimally prepared or unprepared for possibly developing spasticity and were unaware that spasticity manifests as part of MS. Eighty percent experienced spasticity daily, which was variable in severity and duration. Spasticity was triggered by a range of factors and 90% of those surveyed were unable to predict when it would occur or its severity. Day-to-day variability of spasticity prevented 65% of respondents from doing things they wished to do. Sixty percent were confused by their symptoms, not recognizing them as spasticity. Although 91% reported experiencing muscle spasms, only 69% used \\\"muscle spasms\\\" to describe their symptoms. Other descriptors included \\\"muscle tightness,\\\" \\\"stiffness,\\\" \\\"cramping,\\\" and \\\"pain.\\\" After recognizing spasticity, 78% proactively initiated discussions with their physicians, 52% wished they had done so sooner, and 42% delayed the conversation by up to or more than a year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results emphasize the variable nature of spasticity and the lack of a common language to describe symptoms, underscoring the importance of education, earlier recognition, and customized treatments tailored to the severity and duration of spasticity symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of MS care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"75-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10930809/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of MS care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2022-115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of MS care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2022-115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多发性硬化症和痉挛(MSS)患者的痉挛经历各不相同,因为他们可能不认为这是痉挛,也没有语言来描述自己的症状。这可能导致诊断和治疗的潜在延误。2021年,1177名MSS患者完成了一项在线调查,研究了多发性硬化症痉挛所需的症状和情绪。它试图捕捉痉挛的症状、症状的可变性、特定的痉挛诱因,以及如何与医生进行对话。该队列的平均年龄为56.8岁,其中78%为女性。在痉挛发作之前,65%的受访者对可能发生的痉挛感到准备不足或没有准备,并且不知道痉挛表现为多发性硬化症的一部分。80%的受访者每天都经历痉挛,痉挛的严重程度和持续时间各不相同。痉挛是由一系列因素引发的,90%的受访者无法预测痉挛何时发生或严重程度。痉挛的日常变化使65%的受访者无法做他们想做的事情。60%的受访者对自己的症状感到困惑,没有意识到这是痉挛。尽管91%的人报告说经历过肌肉痉挛,但只有69%的人用“肌肉痉挛”来描述他们的症状。其他描述包括“肌肉紧绷”、“僵硬”、“痉挛”和“疼痛”。在意识到痉挛后,78%的人主动与医生进行讨论,52%的人希望他们早点这样做,42%的人将对话推迟了一年或一年以上。研究结果强调了痉挛的可变性和缺乏描述症状的通用语言,强调了教育、早期识别和根据痉挛症状的严重程度和持续时间定制治疗的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recognition, Description, and Variability of Spasticity in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis and Potential Barriers to Clinician-Patient Dialogue: Results From SEEN-MSS, a Large-Scale, Self-Reported Survey.

Background: The experience with spasticity varies among individuals with multiple sclerosis and spasticity (MSS), as they may not recognize it as spasticity or have the language to describe their symptoms. This can lead to potential delays in diagnosis and treatment.

Methods: Symptoms and Emotions Exploration Needed in Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity was an online survey completed by 1177 individuals with MSS in 2021. It sought to capture symptoms of spasticity, variability of symptoms, specific spasticity triggers, and how conversations with physicians were initiated.

Results: The mean age of the cohort was 56.8 years and it was 78% women. Prior to spasticity onset, 65% of respondents felt minimally prepared or unprepared for possibly developing spasticity and were unaware that spasticity manifests as part of MS. Eighty percent experienced spasticity daily, which was variable in severity and duration. Spasticity was triggered by a range of factors and 90% of those surveyed were unable to predict when it would occur or its severity. Day-to-day variability of spasticity prevented 65% of respondents from doing things they wished to do. Sixty percent were confused by their symptoms, not recognizing them as spasticity. Although 91% reported experiencing muscle spasms, only 69% used "muscle spasms" to describe their symptoms. Other descriptors included "muscle tightness," "stiffness," "cramping," and "pain." After recognizing spasticity, 78% proactively initiated discussions with their physicians, 52% wished they had done so sooner, and 42% delayed the conversation by up to or more than a year.

Conclusions: Results emphasize the variable nature of spasticity and the lack of a common language to describe symptoms, underscoring the importance of education, earlier recognition, and customized treatments tailored to the severity and duration of spasticity symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of MS care
International journal of MS care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Impact of Fingolimod Discontinuation Strategy on Recurrence of Disease Activity in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis. Expanding the Connection Between Cognition and Illness Intrusiveness in Multiple Sclerosis. Cognitive Function in Frail Older Adults With Multiple Sclerosis: An Exploratory Study Using Secondary Data Analysis. Exploring the Complexity of Falls in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Study. Reasons for Hospital Admission in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1