肢体肌肉单关节与多关节运动的肥厚效应:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Strength and Conditioning Journal Pub Date : 2022-04-06 DOI:10.1519/SSC.0000000000000720
A. Rosa, Gregory Vazquez, J. Grgic, Anoop T. Balachandran, J. Orazem, B. Schoenfeld
{"title":"肢体肌肉单关节与多关节运动的肥厚效应:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"A. Rosa, Gregory Vazquez, J. Grgic, Anoop T. Balachandran, J. Orazem, B. Schoenfeld","doi":"10.1519/SSC.0000000000000720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effects of single-joint (SJ) and multijoint (MJ) resistance exercises on muscle hypertrophy of the limb muscles. A systematic search was performed to identify randomized trials that directly compared hypertrophic changes between SJ and MJ resistance exercises, as well as combinations of the 2, in healthy adults. A total of 7 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 10 nested comparisons. Meta-analysis indicated a trivial standardized point estimate with a relatively moderate precision for the confidence interval estimate. Subgroup analyses showed no effect on results when stratifying studies according to combined SJ + MJ versus MJ training alone, as well as under volume-equated or nonequated conditions. However, scrutiny of individual studies in conjunction with related indirect evidence collectively indicate that SJ exercise may provide the ability to preferentially hypertrophy muscular subdivisions, potentially promoting more complete muscle development. We conclude that current evidence indicates similar whole muscle hypertrophy between MJ and SJ training. There may be added benefit to combining SJ and MJ exercises for targeting individual aspects of a given muscle, although this hypothesis remains understudied. Future studies are needed to explore the effects of SJ and MJ exercises in resistance training on regional muscle hypertrophy.","PeriodicalId":21993,"journal":{"name":"Strength and Conditioning Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":"49 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypertrophic Effects of Single- Versus Multi-Joint Exercise of the Limb Muscles: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"A. Rosa, Gregory Vazquez, J. Grgic, Anoop T. Balachandran, J. Orazem, B. Schoenfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/SSC.0000000000000720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effects of single-joint (SJ) and multijoint (MJ) resistance exercises on muscle hypertrophy of the limb muscles. A systematic search was performed to identify randomized trials that directly compared hypertrophic changes between SJ and MJ resistance exercises, as well as combinations of the 2, in healthy adults. A total of 7 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 10 nested comparisons. Meta-analysis indicated a trivial standardized point estimate with a relatively moderate precision for the confidence interval estimate. Subgroup analyses showed no effect on results when stratifying studies according to combined SJ + MJ versus MJ training alone, as well as under volume-equated or nonequated conditions. However, scrutiny of individual studies in conjunction with related indirect evidence collectively indicate that SJ exercise may provide the ability to preferentially hypertrophy muscular subdivisions, potentially promoting more complete muscle development. We conclude that current evidence indicates similar whole muscle hypertrophy between MJ and SJ training. There may be added benefit to combining SJ and MJ exercises for targeting individual aspects of a given muscle, although this hypothesis remains understudied. Future studies are needed to explore the effects of SJ and MJ exercises in resistance training on regional muscle hypertrophy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strength and Conditioning Journal\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"49 - 57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strength and Conditioning Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000720\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strength and Conditioning Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,比较了单关节(SJ)和多关节(MJ)阻力运动对肢体肌肉肥厚的影响。我们进行了一项系统搜索,以确定在健康成人中直接比较SJ和MJ阻力运动以及两者结合的肥厚变化的随机试验。共有7项研究符合纳入标准,包括10个嵌套比较。荟萃分析表明,一个微不足道的标准化点估计与相对中等精度的置信区间估计。亚组分析显示,根据SJ + MJ联合训练与单独MJ训练进行分层研究,以及在体积相等或非等量条件下,对结果没有影响。然而,结合相关间接证据的个体研究表明,SJ运动可能提供优先肥厚肌肉分支的能力,潜在地促进更完整的肌肉发育。我们得出结论,目前的证据表明,MJ和SJ训练之间的全肌肥大相似。结合SJ和MJ练习针对特定肌肉的各个方面可能有额外的好处,尽管这一假设仍未得到充分研究。阻力训练中SJ和MJ运动对局部肌肉肥大的影响有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hypertrophic Effects of Single- Versus Multi-Joint Exercise of the Limb Muscles: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
ABSTRACT We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effects of single-joint (SJ) and multijoint (MJ) resistance exercises on muscle hypertrophy of the limb muscles. A systematic search was performed to identify randomized trials that directly compared hypertrophic changes between SJ and MJ resistance exercises, as well as combinations of the 2, in healthy adults. A total of 7 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 10 nested comparisons. Meta-analysis indicated a trivial standardized point estimate with a relatively moderate precision for the confidence interval estimate. Subgroup analyses showed no effect on results when stratifying studies according to combined SJ + MJ versus MJ training alone, as well as under volume-equated or nonequated conditions. However, scrutiny of individual studies in conjunction with related indirect evidence collectively indicate that SJ exercise may provide the ability to preferentially hypertrophy muscular subdivisions, potentially promoting more complete muscle development. We conclude that current evidence indicates similar whole muscle hypertrophy between MJ and SJ training. There may be added benefit to combining SJ and MJ exercises for targeting individual aspects of a given muscle, although this hypothesis remains understudied. Future studies are needed to explore the effects of SJ and MJ exercises in resistance training on regional muscle hypertrophy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strength and Conditioning Journal
Strength and Conditioning Journal 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Strength and Conditioning Journal is the professional journal for strength coaches, personal trainers, physical therapists, athletic trainers, and other health professionals working in the strength and conditioning field. The journal’s mission is to publish articles that report both the practical applications of research findings and the knowledge gained by experienced professionals.
期刊最新文献
Types and Contributors to Occupational Fatigue The Use of Global Positioning Systems Devices to Measure Maximum Velocity in Field-Based Team Sport Athletes: A Narrative Review Effect of Using Different Intensities in Resistance Training for Muscle Hypertrophy Gains—A Narrative Review Preparing Basketball Players for Competition During COVID-19 Lockdown: An International Strength and Conditioning Perspective Selection of Key Performance Indicators for Your Sport and Program: Proposing a Complementary Process-Driven Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1