{"title":"资本结构的决定因素:来自英国的证据","authors":"Sarah ALmuaither, M. Marzouk","doi":"10.17265/1548-6583/2019.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the determinants of capital structure of UK firms by using the ordinary least squares (OLS)\nestimation with six independent variables including company size, profitability, tangibility, growth opportunities,\ntax, and volatility, as well as four industry classification dummy variables and with financial leverage as the\ndependent variable. The data set for the research includes all FTSE 100 companies in 2016. The findings reveal (i)\na positive but insignificant relationship between company size and leverage; (ii) a negative but insignificant\nassociation between profitability and leverage; (iii) level of tangible assets and leverage are negatively related but\nsuch negative relationship is not significant; (iv) growth opportunities and leverage are negatively correlated and\nthe negative relationship is highly statistically significant; (v) tax and leverage are positively related but the\nrelationship is not statistically significant; and (vi) volatility and leverage are negatively related but the relationship\nis not statistically significant. The significant negative relationship between industry dummies and leverage is\nrelated to companies in the mining industry that did not use much debt to finance their business compared to those\nin other industries. Among five different capital structures, the pecking order theory indicates that companies prefer\nemploying internal fund such as retained earnings or excess liquid assets to external finance investment\nopportunities, which seems to be suitable for UK companies. Static trade off theory which addresses the existence\nof optimal capital structures of firms affected by the trade-off between costs and benefits when using debt and\nequity is only applicable in particular cases in the UK. Dynamic trade off theory that argues that the appropriate\nfinancing choice typically relies on the financing margin that is estimated in the coming period, and market timing\ntheory which demonstrates that stock price fluctuations in the market influence companies’ capital structure, are not\nsupported by the findings of this study.","PeriodicalId":71220,"journal":{"name":"现代会计与审计:英文版","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of Capital Structure: Evidence from the UK\",\"authors\":\"Sarah ALmuaither, M. Marzouk\",\"doi\":\"10.17265/1548-6583/2019.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the determinants of capital structure of UK firms by using the ordinary least squares (OLS)\\nestimation with six independent variables including company size, profitability, tangibility, growth opportunities,\\ntax, and volatility, as well as four industry classification dummy variables and with financial leverage as the\\ndependent variable. The data set for the research includes all FTSE 100 companies in 2016. The findings reveal (i)\\na positive but insignificant relationship between company size and leverage; (ii) a negative but insignificant\\nassociation between profitability and leverage; (iii) level of tangible assets and leverage are negatively related but\\nsuch negative relationship is not significant; (iv) growth opportunities and leverage are negatively correlated and\\nthe negative relationship is highly statistically significant; (v) tax and leverage are positively related but the\\nrelationship is not statistically significant; and (vi) volatility and leverage are negatively related but the relationship\\nis not statistically significant. The significant negative relationship between industry dummies and leverage is\\nrelated to companies in the mining industry that did not use much debt to finance their business compared to those\\nin other industries. Among five different capital structures, the pecking order theory indicates that companies prefer\\nemploying internal fund such as retained earnings or excess liquid assets to external finance investment\\nopportunities, which seems to be suitable for UK companies. Static trade off theory which addresses the existence\\nof optimal capital structures of firms affected by the trade-off between costs and benefits when using debt and\\nequity is only applicable in particular cases in the UK. Dynamic trade off theory that argues that the appropriate\\nfinancing choice typically relies on the financing margin that is estimated in the coming period, and market timing\\ntheory which demonstrates that stock price fluctuations in the market influence companies’ capital structure, are not\\nsupported by the findings of this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":71220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"现代会计与审计:英文版\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"现代会计与审计:英文版\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6583/2019.06.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"现代会计与审计:英文版","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6583/2019.06.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determinants of Capital Structure: Evidence from the UK
This study investigates the determinants of capital structure of UK firms by using the ordinary least squares (OLS)
estimation with six independent variables including company size, profitability, tangibility, growth opportunities,
tax, and volatility, as well as four industry classification dummy variables and with financial leverage as the
dependent variable. The data set for the research includes all FTSE 100 companies in 2016. The findings reveal (i)
a positive but insignificant relationship between company size and leverage; (ii) a negative but insignificant
association between profitability and leverage; (iii) level of tangible assets and leverage are negatively related but
such negative relationship is not significant; (iv) growth opportunities and leverage are negatively correlated and
the negative relationship is highly statistically significant; (v) tax and leverage are positively related but the
relationship is not statistically significant; and (vi) volatility and leverage are negatively related but the relationship
is not statistically significant. The significant negative relationship between industry dummies and leverage is
related to companies in the mining industry that did not use much debt to finance their business compared to those
in other industries. Among five different capital structures, the pecking order theory indicates that companies prefer
employing internal fund such as retained earnings or excess liquid assets to external finance investment
opportunities, which seems to be suitable for UK companies. Static trade off theory which addresses the existence
of optimal capital structures of firms affected by the trade-off between costs and benefits when using debt and
equity is only applicable in particular cases in the UK. Dynamic trade off theory that argues that the appropriate
financing choice typically relies on the financing margin that is estimated in the coming period, and market timing
theory which demonstrates that stock price fluctuations in the market influence companies’ capital structure, are not
supported by the findings of this study.