对话语研究中与权力相关的制度、文化和组织的理解

IF 1 Q3 COMMUNICATION Journal of Multicultural Discourses Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17447143.2023.2209053
Jasper Roe
{"title":"对话语研究中与权力相关的制度、文化和组织的理解","authors":"Jasper Roe","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2023.2209053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discourse studies as an evolving field is continuing to broach new areas and develop important novel and theoretical viewpoints while simultaneously creating opportunities to revisit existing programmes that have produced insight into discursive patterns over the previous decades. This comparative review describes two recent edited volumes which each contribute different, yet equally valuable approaches to the field of discourse studies. Each of these titles brings together a range of research and interpretive reflections in vastly different cultural contexts and social spaces, thus reflecting the breadth and depth of discourse studies and its important in a multicultural trans-disciplinary field. The first of these, Institutionality: Studies of Discursive and Material (Re-)ordering, edited by Yannik Porsché, Ronny Scholz, and Jaspal Naveel Singh, seeks to develop and operationalize a novel concept of institutionality and demonstrate its growing relevance in discourse studies, while the second, Discourse, Culture, and Organization, edited by Tomas Marttila, seeks to shed further light on the differing strands of discourse and the varying theoretical and methodological positions and traditions available to researchers, with specific focus on the Essex School. This review begins with a summary of the first volume, exploring its key themes and identifying the common subjects that run throughout the chapters, before the same is repeated for the second title and contrasts are drawn where appropriate. The review closes by re-examining the place of each of the titles and their contribution and occupied space in the field of discourse across varying cultural contexts. Both volumes are essential for discourse researchers of all levels of familiarity and experience, despite unique differences in orientation and focus.","PeriodicalId":45223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an understanding of institutionality, culture, and organization in relation to power in discourse studies\",\"authors\":\"Jasper Roe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17447143.2023.2209053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Discourse studies as an evolving field is continuing to broach new areas and develop important novel and theoretical viewpoints while simultaneously creating opportunities to revisit existing programmes that have produced insight into discursive patterns over the previous decades. This comparative review describes two recent edited volumes which each contribute different, yet equally valuable approaches to the field of discourse studies. Each of these titles brings together a range of research and interpretive reflections in vastly different cultural contexts and social spaces, thus reflecting the breadth and depth of discourse studies and its important in a multicultural trans-disciplinary field. The first of these, Institutionality: Studies of Discursive and Material (Re-)ordering, edited by Yannik Porsché, Ronny Scholz, and Jaspal Naveel Singh, seeks to develop and operationalize a novel concept of institutionality and demonstrate its growing relevance in discourse studies, while the second, Discourse, Culture, and Organization, edited by Tomas Marttila, seeks to shed further light on the differing strands of discourse and the varying theoretical and methodological positions and traditions available to researchers, with specific focus on the Essex School. This review begins with a summary of the first volume, exploring its key themes and identifying the common subjects that run throughout the chapters, before the same is repeated for the second title and contrasts are drawn where appropriate. The review closes by re-examining the place of each of the titles and their contribution and occupied space in the field of discourse across varying cultural contexts. Both volumes are essential for discourse researchers of all levels of familiarity and experience, despite unique differences in orientation and focus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multicultural Discourses\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multicultural Discourses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2023.2209053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2023.2209053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

话语研究作为一个不断发展的领域,正在不断开拓新的领域,发展重要的新颖理论观点,同时创造机会,重新审视过去几十年来对话语模式产生深刻见解的现有项目。这个比较评论描述了两个最近编辑的卷,每个贡献不同,但同样有价值的话语研究领域的方法。每本书都汇集了不同文化背景和社会空间的一系列研究和解释性思考,从而反映了话语研究的广度和深度及其在多元文化跨学科领域的重要性。第一个,制度性由Yannik porsch、Ronny Scholz和Jaspal Naveel Singh编辑的《话语与材料(再)排序研究》试图发展和实现一个新的制度性概念,并展示其在话语研究中的日益增长的相关性,而由Tomas Marttila编辑的第二本《话语、文化和组织》则试图进一步阐明话语的不同分支以及研究人员可用的不同理论和方法论立场和传统。特别关注埃塞克斯学校。本综述以第一卷的总结开始,探讨其关键主题,并确定贯穿各章的共同主题,然后在第二卷中重复同样的内容,并在适当的地方进行对比。回顾以重新审视每个标题的位置及其在不同文化背景下话语领域的贡献和占据的空间结束。尽管在取向和焦点上有独特的差异,但这两卷书对所有熟悉程度和经验的话语研究者都是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards an understanding of institutionality, culture, and organization in relation to power in discourse studies
Discourse studies as an evolving field is continuing to broach new areas and develop important novel and theoretical viewpoints while simultaneously creating opportunities to revisit existing programmes that have produced insight into discursive patterns over the previous decades. This comparative review describes two recent edited volumes which each contribute different, yet equally valuable approaches to the field of discourse studies. Each of these titles brings together a range of research and interpretive reflections in vastly different cultural contexts and social spaces, thus reflecting the breadth and depth of discourse studies and its important in a multicultural trans-disciplinary field. The first of these, Institutionality: Studies of Discursive and Material (Re-)ordering, edited by Yannik Porsché, Ronny Scholz, and Jaspal Naveel Singh, seeks to develop and operationalize a novel concept of institutionality and demonstrate its growing relevance in discourse studies, while the second, Discourse, Culture, and Organization, edited by Tomas Marttila, seeks to shed further light on the differing strands of discourse and the varying theoretical and methodological positions and traditions available to researchers, with specific focus on the Essex School. This review begins with a summary of the first volume, exploring its key themes and identifying the common subjects that run throughout the chapters, before the same is repeated for the second title and contrasts are drawn where appropriate. The review closes by re-examining the place of each of the titles and their contribution and occupied space in the field of discourse across varying cultural contexts. Both volumes are essential for discourse researchers of all levels of familiarity and experience, despite unique differences in orientation and focus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The media and civil protests in Africa: contextualising Nigerian press coverage of #EndSARS Enchronic cultural discourse analysis: a semio-cultural study of national identity discourse of Saudi Founding Day A rhetorical-political framework for multilingual and translingual scholarship Interfacing the cultural dialectics of commodification and resistance: Nubian spatial/narrative repertoires as markers of hybrid diaspora culture Revisiting translation as transculturation: from ancient Chinese origin ‘Djargron’ to global representation ‘Dragon’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1