德国中三叠世kupferzellbatrachotomus的食性及其古生态学意义

IF 2.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 PALEONTOLOGY Palaeontology Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1111/pala.12597
E. Mujal, C. Foth, E. Maxwell, Dieter Seegis, R. Schoch
{"title":"德国中三叠世kupferzellbatrachotomus的食性及其古生态学意义","authors":"E. Mujal, C. Foth, E. Maxwell, Dieter Seegis, R. Schoch","doi":"10.1111/pala.12597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bite traces on fossil bones are key to deciphering feeding ecology and trophic interactions of vertebrate past ecosystems. However, similarities between traces produced by different carnivorous taxa with similar dentitions, and misidentifications due to equifinality, hinder confident identifications of the bite makers. Here, we correlate bite traces with macroscopic wear and microanatomy of the teeth of the pseudosuchian archosaur Batrachotomus kupferzellensis from the Triassic Lower Keuper fossil lagerstätten (southern Germany), untangling its feeding habits and shedding light on the bite traces generated by ziphodont teeth (teeth with serrated carinae). Individually, bite traces reflect tooth morphology, whereas composite bite traces and their frequency are related to feeding behaviour and explain tooth macroscopic wear and microanatomy. Therefore the identification of the bite maker is possible by analysing composite bite traces, their location on bones, and their relative abundance. In addition, tooth macroscopic wear and microanatomy are proven as independent lines of evidence of feeding ecology. Comparing bite traces on fossil and present‐day bone assemblages, we observe that bone modifications by the crocodylomorph lineage (from Triassic pseudosuchian archosaurs to extinct and extant crocodylians) are strikingly similar, including taxa with and without ziphodont teeth. Such a set of features differs from bone modification assemblages produced by taxa with similar ziphodont teeth outside the pseudosuchian lineage, such as theropod dinosaurs and the Komodo monitor, suggesting phylogeny is a better predictor of feeding ecology among saurian reptiles than tooth morphology.","PeriodicalId":56272,"journal":{"name":"Palaeontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feeding habits of the Middle Triassic pseudosuchian Batrachotomus kupferzellensis from Germany and palaeoecological implications for archosaurs\",\"authors\":\"E. Mujal, C. Foth, E. Maxwell, Dieter Seegis, R. Schoch\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pala.12597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bite traces on fossil bones are key to deciphering feeding ecology and trophic interactions of vertebrate past ecosystems. However, similarities between traces produced by different carnivorous taxa with similar dentitions, and misidentifications due to equifinality, hinder confident identifications of the bite makers. Here, we correlate bite traces with macroscopic wear and microanatomy of the teeth of the pseudosuchian archosaur Batrachotomus kupferzellensis from the Triassic Lower Keuper fossil lagerstätten (southern Germany), untangling its feeding habits and shedding light on the bite traces generated by ziphodont teeth (teeth with serrated carinae). Individually, bite traces reflect tooth morphology, whereas composite bite traces and their frequency are related to feeding behaviour and explain tooth macroscopic wear and microanatomy. Therefore the identification of the bite maker is possible by analysing composite bite traces, their location on bones, and their relative abundance. In addition, tooth macroscopic wear and microanatomy are proven as independent lines of evidence of feeding ecology. Comparing bite traces on fossil and present‐day bone assemblages, we observe that bone modifications by the crocodylomorph lineage (from Triassic pseudosuchian archosaurs to extinct and extant crocodylians) are strikingly similar, including taxa with and without ziphodont teeth. Such a set of features differs from bone modification assemblages produced by taxa with similar ziphodont teeth outside the pseudosuchian lineage, such as theropod dinosaurs and the Komodo monitor, suggesting phylogeny is a better predictor of feeding ecology among saurian reptiles than tooth morphology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palaeontology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palaeontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12597\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PALEONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palaeontology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12597","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

化石骨骼上的咬痕是解读脊椎动物过去生态系统的进食生态学和营养相互作用的关键。然而,由具有相似齿系的不同肉食性分类群产生的痕迹之间的相似性,以及由于等最终性而导致的错误识别,阻碍了咬痕制作者的自信识别。在这里,我们将咬合痕迹与三叠纪下科佩尔化石lagerstätten(德国南部)中的假苏克阶祖龙Batrachotomus kupferzellensis牙齿的宏观磨损和微观解剖联系起来,解开了它的进食习惯,并揭示了ziphodont牙齿(具有锯齿状隆突的牙齿)产生的咬合痕迹。单独来看,咬合痕迹反映了牙齿的形态,而复合咬合痕迹及其频率与进食行为有关,并解释了牙齿的宏观磨损和微观解剖。因此,通过分析复合咬痕、它们在骨骼上的位置以及它们的相对丰度,可以识别出咬痕制造者。此外,牙齿的宏观磨损和微观解剖被证明是喂养生态学的独立证据。通过比较化石和当今骨骼组合上的咬痕,我们观察到鳄鱼化石谱系(从三叠纪假苏奇亚龙到已灭绝和现存的鳄鱼化石)的骨骼变化惊人地相似,包括有和没有齐波东齿的分类群。这一组特征不同于假苏类谱系之外具有相似齐波顿齿的分类群产生的骨骼修饰组合,如兽脚亚目恐龙和科莫多巨兽,这表明系统发育比牙齿形态更能预测蜥类爬行动物的进食生态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feeding habits of the Middle Triassic pseudosuchian Batrachotomus kupferzellensis from Germany and palaeoecological implications for archosaurs
Bite traces on fossil bones are key to deciphering feeding ecology and trophic interactions of vertebrate past ecosystems. However, similarities between traces produced by different carnivorous taxa with similar dentitions, and misidentifications due to equifinality, hinder confident identifications of the bite makers. Here, we correlate bite traces with macroscopic wear and microanatomy of the teeth of the pseudosuchian archosaur Batrachotomus kupferzellensis from the Triassic Lower Keuper fossil lagerstätten (southern Germany), untangling its feeding habits and shedding light on the bite traces generated by ziphodont teeth (teeth with serrated carinae). Individually, bite traces reflect tooth morphology, whereas composite bite traces and their frequency are related to feeding behaviour and explain tooth macroscopic wear and microanatomy. Therefore the identification of the bite maker is possible by analysing composite bite traces, their location on bones, and their relative abundance. In addition, tooth macroscopic wear and microanatomy are proven as independent lines of evidence of feeding ecology. Comparing bite traces on fossil and present‐day bone assemblages, we observe that bone modifications by the crocodylomorph lineage (from Triassic pseudosuchian archosaurs to extinct and extant crocodylians) are strikingly similar, including taxa with and without ziphodont teeth. Such a set of features differs from bone modification assemblages produced by taxa with similar ziphodont teeth outside the pseudosuchian lineage, such as theropod dinosaurs and the Komodo monitor, suggesting phylogeny is a better predictor of feeding ecology among saurian reptiles than tooth morphology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palaeontology
Palaeontology 地学-古生物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Palaeontology publishes a wide variety of papers on palaeontological topics covering: palaeozoology palaeobotany systematic studies palaeoecology micropalaeontology palaeobiogeography functional morphology stratigraphy taxonomy taphonomy palaeoenvironmental reconstruction palaeoclimate analysis and biomineralization studies.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the macroevolutionary impact of ecosystem engineers using an individual‐based eco‐evolutionary simulation New evidence for five cephalic appendages in trilobites and implications for segmentation of the trilobite head The palaeobiological significance of clustering in acritarchs: a case study from the early Cambrian of North Greenland Impact of environmental barriers on temnospondyl biogeography and dispersal during the Middle–Late Triassic Priapulid neoichnology, ecosystem engineering, and the Ediacaran–Cambrian transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1