Q4 Medicine Anestezi Dergisi Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI:10.54875/jarss.2023.35693
Bilge Olgun Keleş, M. Kaya, Serpil Şavlı, Fatih Arslan, Cemile Açıkgöz Yıldız, Elvan Tekir Yılmaz
{"title":"Septoplasti Operasyonlarında Ketofol ile Midazolam-Fentanil Sedoanaljezi Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması","authors":"Bilge Olgun Keleş, M. Kaya, Serpil Şavlı, Fatih Arslan, Cemile Açıkgöz Yıldız, Elvan Tekir Yılmaz","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2023.35693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Sedoanalgesia is an anesthesia method that is preferred mostly in outside the operating room interventions and some short-term surgeries, allowing the procedure to be performed by using sedative and dissociative agents alone or together. Closed technique septoplasty operation is also an operation that can be performed with sedoanalgesia. The aim of this study is to compare the sedative and analgesic effects of ketamine and propofol combination and midazolam and fentanyl combination, surgical satisfaction and patient satisfaction in patients who underwent closed technique septoplasty operation. Methods: After ethics committee approval, 60 ASA I and II patients were included in the study by dividing into 2 groups. Patients who used ketamine and propofol for sedoanalgesia were named Group 1 (ketofol), and patients who used midazolam and fentanyl were named Group 2 (midafenta). The data of the patients were recorded from the intraoperative anesthesia forms and the postoperative recovery unit forms. Complications, side effects, surgery and patient satisfaction were questioned. Results: Mean arterial pressure was found to be significantly lower in the ketofol group at the 3rd minute after induction than in the midfenta group. The sedation score in the midafenta group at the 10th and 20th minutes intraoperatively was significantly lower than in the ketofol group. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction, but surgical satisfaction was significantly higher in the midafenta group. Conclusion: In closed technique septoplasty operations, sedoanalgesia applied with ketofol and midafenta methods can be used without the need for general anesthesia. However, ketofol, which is highly preferred for sedoanalgesia, did not provide sufficient surgical satisfaction in patients who underwent closed technique septoplasty. We attributed this to the dissociation of the patients and their inability to comply with surgical commands. Keywords: Propofol, ketamine, midazolam, fentanyl","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2023.35693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:镇静镇痛是一种麻醉方法,主要用于手术室外干预和一些短期手术,允许单独或联合使用镇静剂和离解剂进行手术。闭式技术鼻中隔成形术也是一种可用于硬膜外疼痛的手术。本研究的目的是比较氯胺酮和丙泊酚联合用药以及咪达唑仑和芬太尼联合用药的镇静镇痛效果、手术满意度和患者满意度。方法:经伦理委员会批准,将60名ASA I和II患者分为2组纳入研究。使用氯胺酮和丙泊酚治疗坐痛的患者被命名为第1组(酮醇),使用咪达唑仑和芬太尼的患者被称为第2组(米达芬塔)。患者的数据记录在术中麻醉表格和术后恢复单位表格中。并发症、副作用、手术和患者满意度受到质疑。结果:酮醇组在诱导后第3分钟的平均动脉压显著低于足中部组。术中第10分钟和第20分钟,米达芬塔组的镇静评分显著低于酮醇组。患者满意度没有显著差异,但米达芬塔组的手术满意度明显更高。结论:在封闭式鼻中隔成形术中,应用酮醇和米达芬塔方法可以在不需要全身麻醉的情况下使用镇静镇痛。然而,酮症酸中毒是首选药物,但在接受封闭式鼻中隔成形术的患者中,酮症醇并不能提供足够的手术满意度。我们将此归因于患者的分离以及他们无法遵守手术指令。关键词:异丙酚、氯胺酮、咪唑安定、芬太尼
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Septoplasti Operasyonlarında Ketofol ile Midazolam-Fentanil Sedoanaljezi Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması
Objective: Sedoanalgesia is an anesthesia method that is preferred mostly in outside the operating room interventions and some short-term surgeries, allowing the procedure to be performed by using sedative and dissociative agents alone or together. Closed technique septoplasty operation is also an operation that can be performed with sedoanalgesia. The aim of this study is to compare the sedative and analgesic effects of ketamine and propofol combination and midazolam and fentanyl combination, surgical satisfaction and patient satisfaction in patients who underwent closed technique septoplasty operation. Methods: After ethics committee approval, 60 ASA I and II patients were included in the study by dividing into 2 groups. Patients who used ketamine and propofol for sedoanalgesia were named Group 1 (ketofol), and patients who used midazolam and fentanyl were named Group 2 (midafenta). The data of the patients were recorded from the intraoperative anesthesia forms and the postoperative recovery unit forms. Complications, side effects, surgery and patient satisfaction were questioned. Results: Mean arterial pressure was found to be significantly lower in the ketofol group at the 3rd minute after induction than in the midfenta group. The sedation score in the midafenta group at the 10th and 20th minutes intraoperatively was significantly lower than in the ketofol group. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction, but surgical satisfaction was significantly higher in the midafenta group. Conclusion: In closed technique septoplasty operations, sedoanalgesia applied with ketofol and midafenta methods can be used without the need for general anesthesia. However, ketofol, which is highly preferred for sedoanalgesia, did not provide sufficient surgical satisfaction in patients who underwent closed technique septoplasty. We attributed this to the dissociation of the patients and their inability to comply with surgical commands. Keywords: Propofol, ketamine, midazolam, fentanyl
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Perioperative Hypothermia and Associated Factors: A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluation of the Knowledge, Skills and Practices on Rapid Sequence Intubation of Physicians Working in Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinics in Turkey: Survey Study Indispensable for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units: End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Capnography: A Bibliometric Analysis during 1980-2022 Inadequancy and Differences about the Attitudes in Pain Control of Cancer Patients: Assessment of Algology Department Acute Hepatic Injury Following Cardiac Surgery: Retrospective Observational Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1