作为批判知识分子的赫伯特·马尔库塞:新左派和替代社会主义的未来

N. Stevenson
{"title":"作为批判知识分子的赫伯特·马尔库塞:新左派和替代社会主义的未来","authors":"N. Stevenson","doi":"10.1080/08935696.2022.2026753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A reassessment of Herbert Marcuse’s critical theory is timely given the recent revival of interest in his life and work and the critical questions he poses for the endemic violence of late capitalism. This essay considers Marcuse’s ideas on liberation and a postwork future from the viewpoint of the 1960s before examining attempts to relocate his scholarship in the present. The essay focuses on the dialectical nature of Marcuse’s writings and points to critical possibilities for a society beyond the one-dimensional present in a future world that will have socialized the economy and liberated nature while having broken with the puritan ethic, thereby enabling citizens to live more peaceful and fulfilled lives. But Marcuse remains a problematic intellectual for socialists to the extent of his distance from the working-class movement. His work therefore needs to be carefully positioned in relation to relevant New Left voices that remain critical of his intellectual and cultural production.","PeriodicalId":45610,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Herbert Marcuse as a Critical Intellectual: The New Left and Alternative Socialist Futures\",\"authors\":\"N. Stevenson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08935696.2022.2026753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A reassessment of Herbert Marcuse’s critical theory is timely given the recent revival of interest in his life and work and the critical questions he poses for the endemic violence of late capitalism. This essay considers Marcuse’s ideas on liberation and a postwork future from the viewpoint of the 1960s before examining attempts to relocate his scholarship in the present. The essay focuses on the dialectical nature of Marcuse’s writings and points to critical possibilities for a society beyond the one-dimensional present in a future world that will have socialized the economy and liberated nature while having broken with the puritan ethic, thereby enabling citizens to live more peaceful and fulfilled lives. But Marcuse remains a problematic intellectual for socialists to the extent of his distance from the working-class movement. His work therefore needs to be carefully positioned in relation to relevant New Left voices that remain critical of his intellectual and cultural production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2026753\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2026753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

鉴于最近人们对赫伯特·马尔库塞的生活和工作重新产生兴趣,以及他对晚期资本主义的地方性暴力提出的关键问题,对马尔库塞的批判理论进行重新评估是及时的。本文从20世纪60年代的角度考察了马尔库塞关于解放和后工作未来的思想,然后考察了将他的学术重新定位到现在的尝试。本文着重于马尔库塞作品的辩证本质,并指出了在未来世界中超越一维现在的社会的批判可能性,这个社会将实现经济的社会化,解放自然,同时打破清教伦理,从而使公民能够过上更加和平和充实的生活。但对于社会主义者来说,马尔库塞仍然是一个有问题的知识分子,因为他与工人阶级运动的距离太远了。因此,他的作品需要谨慎地定位于相关的新左派声音,这些声音仍然对他的知识和文化作品持批评态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Herbert Marcuse as a Critical Intellectual: The New Left and Alternative Socialist Futures
A reassessment of Herbert Marcuse’s critical theory is timely given the recent revival of interest in his life and work and the critical questions he poses for the endemic violence of late capitalism. This essay considers Marcuse’s ideas on liberation and a postwork future from the viewpoint of the 1960s before examining attempts to relocate his scholarship in the present. The essay focuses on the dialectical nature of Marcuse’s writings and points to critical possibilities for a society beyond the one-dimensional present in a future world that will have socialized the economy and liberated nature while having broken with the puritan ethic, thereby enabling citizens to live more peaceful and fulfilled lives. But Marcuse remains a problematic intellectual for socialists to the extent of his distance from the working-class movement. His work therefore needs to be carefully positioned in relation to relevant New Left voices that remain critical of his intellectual and cultural production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
The Vulgar (in) Marxism: Vacillating between Exchange and Production Toward a Vulgar Transgender Marxism Vulgar, Crude, Foolish: Brecht, Teaching, Fascism Airbrushing Out Revolutionary Social Democracy: Lenin, Stalin, and Potresov on the Second International Editors’ Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1