多平面脊柱畸形后路手术矫正的计划分期有何不同?

Islam Sorour, S. Samy, A. Madkour
{"title":"多平面脊柱畸形后路手术矫正的计划分期有何不同?","authors":"Islam Sorour, S. Samy, A. Madkour","doi":"10.21608/esj.2019.12339.1098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Data: Complex spine surgery is a challenging and difficult procedure. It has to be performed by senior spine surgeons to correct complex deformities. This type of corrective procedures can be challenging and commonly requires long Background Data: Complex spine surgery is a challenging and difficult procedure. It has to be performed by senior spine surgeons to correct complex deformities. This type of corrective procedures can be challenging and commonly requires long operations, with subsequent higher rates of complications when compared to ordinary spine operations. The literature has few data comparing the outcomes of single-stage posterior operation versus staged posterior correction of complex spine surgery. Single-session surgery entails the classical correction of complex deformities via a single-stage posterior operation, while staged posterior surgery means dividing the surgical maneuver into two posterior sessions with the final correction being performed in the second session. Studying the clinical and radiological data is extremely helpful in determining the safety and effectiveness of staginglong spinal operations for the correction of complex spinal deformities. Purpose: This study aims to compare perioperative and 1-year outcomes of single-stage posterior correction versus staged posterior surgical correction of complex spine deformities. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Patients and Methods: Patient sample: A total of 22 patients with complex spinal deformity were recruited for this study (12, one-stage operation; 10, two-stage operation). Outcome measures: Perioperative and one-year postoperative clinical and radiological data were collected and analyzed. Data included operative time, blood loss, immediate postoperative Cobb angle, one-year Cobb angle and percentage of correction of the deformity, one-year loss of correction, and one-year complication rate. Results There were no significant differences between the 2 groups as regards immediate postoperative Cobb angle (33.0±15.0, one-stage operation; 30.8±14.8, two-stage operation; P=0.771); percentage of correction within one year (60.7±12.0%, one-stage operation; 60.1±16.1%, two-stage operation; P=0.974);  one-year loss of correction % (7.8±3.2, one-stage operation; 6.3±3.3, two-stage operation; P=0.238); one-year complication rate (83.3%, one-stage operation; 60%, two-stage operation; P=0.348). However, statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of the total blood loss (3366.7±499.7 ml, one-stage operation; 4035.0±887.0 ml two-stage operation; P=0.038) and total operative time (353.3±46.8 min, one-stage operation; 486.5±131.5 min two-stage operation; P=0.011). Neurological complications (16.7%) and malpositioned screws (25%) were reported only in one-stage operations (however, this was statistically nonsignificant when comparing total complications in both groups (c2=1.833 and 2.895, resp.; P=0.481 and 0.221, resp.). Neurological complications were directly related to operative time (415±35.4 min) (P=0.033), average blood loss (4100±141.4 ml) (P=0.014), and postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) (5.5±0.7 g) (P=0.002). Conclusion: Our data suggest that staging complex spine procedures should be considered in any lengthy spinal operations (≥ 415 min) and operations with excessive blood loss (≥ 4100 ml) to protect against and prevent irreversible neurological insults. (2019ESJ186) the outcomes of single-stage posterior operation versus staged posterior correction of complex spine surgery. Single-session surgery entails the classical correction of complex deformities via a single-stage posterior operation, while staged posterior surgery means dividing the surgical maneuver into two posterior sessions with the final correction being performed in the second session. Studying the clinical and radiological data is extremely helpful in determining the safety and effectiveness of staging long spinal operations for the correction of complex spinal deformities. Purpose: This study aims to compare perioperative and 1-year outcomes of single-stage posterior correction versus staged posterior surgical correction of complex spine deformities. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Patients and Methods: Patient sample: A total of 22 patients with complex spinal deformity were recruited for this study (12, one-stage operation; 10, two-stage operation). Outcome measures: Perioperative and one-year postoperative clinical and radiological data were collected and analyzed. Data included operative time, blood loss, immediate postoperative Cobb angle, one-year Cobb angle and percentage of correction of the deformity, one-year loss of correction, and one-year complication rate. Results There were no significant differences between the 2 groups as regards immediate postoperative Cobb angle (33.0±15.0, one-stage operation; 30.8±14.8, two-stage operation; P=0.771); percentage of correction within one year (60.7±12.0%, one-stage operation; 60.1±16.1%, two-stage operation; P=0.974); one-year loss of correction % (7.8±3.2, one-stage operation; 6.3±3.3, two-stage operation; P=0.238); one-year complication rate (83.3%, one-stage operation; 60%, two-stage operation; P=0.348). However, statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of the total blood loss (3366.7±499.7 ml, one-stage operation; 4035.0±887.0 ml two-stage operation; P=0.038) and total operative time (353.3±46.8 min, one-stage operation; 486.5±131.5 min two-stage operation; P=0.011). Neurological complications (16.7%) and malpositioned screws (25%) were reported only in one-stage operations (however, this was statistically nonsignificant when comparing total complications in both groups (=1.833 and 2.895, resp.; P=0.481 and 0.221, resp.). Neurological complications were directly related to operative time (415±35.4 min) (P=0.033), average blood loss (4100±141.4 ml) (P=0.014), and postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) (5.5±0.7 g) (P=0.002). Conclusion: Our data suggest that staging complex spine procedures should be considered in any lengthy spinal operations (≥ 415 min) and operations with excessive blood loss (≥ 4100 ml) to protect against and prevent irreversible neurological insults.","PeriodicalId":11610,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planned staging for posterior surgical correction of multi-planar spinal deformities, does it differ?\",\"authors\":\"Islam Sorour, S. Samy, A. Madkour\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/esj.2019.12339.1098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Data: Complex spine surgery is a challenging and difficult procedure. It has to be performed by senior spine surgeons to correct complex deformities. This type of corrective procedures can be challenging and commonly requires long Background Data: Complex spine surgery is a challenging and difficult procedure. It has to be performed by senior spine surgeons to correct complex deformities. This type of corrective procedures can be challenging and commonly requires long operations, with subsequent higher rates of complications when compared to ordinary spine operations. The literature has few data comparing the outcomes of single-stage posterior operation versus staged posterior correction of complex spine surgery. Single-session surgery entails the classical correction of complex deformities via a single-stage posterior operation, while staged posterior surgery means dividing the surgical maneuver into two posterior sessions with the final correction being performed in the second session. Studying the clinical and radiological data is extremely helpful in determining the safety and effectiveness of staginglong spinal operations for the correction of complex spinal deformities. Purpose: This study aims to compare perioperative and 1-year outcomes of single-stage posterior correction versus staged posterior surgical correction of complex spine deformities. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Patients and Methods: Patient sample: A total of 22 patients with complex spinal deformity were recruited for this study (12, one-stage operation; 10, two-stage operation). Outcome measures: Perioperative and one-year postoperative clinical and radiological data were collected and analyzed. Data included operative time, blood loss, immediate postoperative Cobb angle, one-year Cobb angle and percentage of correction of the deformity, one-year loss of correction, and one-year complication rate. Results There were no significant differences between the 2 groups as regards immediate postoperative Cobb angle (33.0±15.0, one-stage operation; 30.8±14.8, two-stage operation; P=0.771); percentage of correction within one year (60.7±12.0%, one-stage operation; 60.1±16.1%, two-stage operation; P=0.974);  one-year loss of correction % (7.8±3.2, one-stage operation; 6.3±3.3, two-stage operation; P=0.238); one-year complication rate (83.3%, one-stage operation; 60%, two-stage operation; P=0.348). However, statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of the total blood loss (3366.7±499.7 ml, one-stage operation; 4035.0±887.0 ml two-stage operation; P=0.038) and total operative time (353.3±46.8 min, one-stage operation; 486.5±131.5 min two-stage operation; P=0.011). Neurological complications (16.7%) and malpositioned screws (25%) were reported only in one-stage operations (however, this was statistically nonsignificant when comparing total complications in both groups (c2=1.833 and 2.895, resp.; P=0.481 and 0.221, resp.). Neurological complications were directly related to operative time (415±35.4 min) (P=0.033), average blood loss (4100±141.4 ml) (P=0.014), and postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) (5.5±0.7 g) (P=0.002). Conclusion: Our data suggest that staging complex spine procedures should be considered in any lengthy spinal operations (≥ 415 min) and operations with excessive blood loss (≥ 4100 ml) to protect against and prevent irreversible neurological insults. (2019ESJ186) the outcomes of single-stage posterior operation versus staged posterior correction of complex spine surgery. Single-session surgery entails the classical correction of complex deformities via a single-stage posterior operation, while staged posterior surgery means dividing the surgical maneuver into two posterior sessions with the final correction being performed in the second session. Studying the clinical and radiological data is extremely helpful in determining the safety and effectiveness of staging long spinal operations for the correction of complex spinal deformities. Purpose: This study aims to compare perioperative and 1-year outcomes of single-stage posterior correction versus staged posterior surgical correction of complex spine deformities. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Patients and Methods: Patient sample: A total of 22 patients with complex spinal deformity were recruited for this study (12, one-stage operation; 10, two-stage operation). Outcome measures: Perioperative and one-year postoperative clinical and radiological data were collected and analyzed. Data included operative time, blood loss, immediate postoperative Cobb angle, one-year Cobb angle and percentage of correction of the deformity, one-year loss of correction, and one-year complication rate. Results There were no significant differences between the 2 groups as regards immediate postoperative Cobb angle (33.0±15.0, one-stage operation; 30.8±14.8, two-stage operation; P=0.771); percentage of correction within one year (60.7±12.0%, one-stage operation; 60.1±16.1%, two-stage operation; P=0.974); one-year loss of correction % (7.8±3.2, one-stage operation; 6.3±3.3, two-stage operation; P=0.238); one-year complication rate (83.3%, one-stage operation; 60%, two-stage operation; P=0.348). However, statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of the total blood loss (3366.7±499.7 ml, one-stage operation; 4035.0±887.0 ml two-stage operation; P=0.038) and total operative time (353.3±46.8 min, one-stage operation; 486.5±131.5 min two-stage operation; P=0.011). Neurological complications (16.7%) and malpositioned screws (25%) were reported only in one-stage operations (however, this was statistically nonsignificant when comparing total complications in both groups (=1.833 and 2.895, resp.; P=0.481 and 0.221, resp.). Neurological complications were directly related to operative time (415±35.4 min) (P=0.033), average blood loss (4100±141.4 ml) (P=0.014), and postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) (5.5±0.7 g) (P=0.002). Conclusion: Our data suggest that staging complex spine procedures should be considered in any lengthy spinal operations (≥ 415 min) and operations with excessive blood loss (≥ 4100 ml) to protect against and prevent irreversible neurological insults.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/esj.2019.12339.1098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/esj.2019.12339.1098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景资料:复杂脊柱外科是一项具有挑战性和难度的手术。它必须由资深脊柱外科医生来矫正复杂的畸形。背景资料:复杂的脊柱外科手术是一项具有挑战性和难度的手术。它必须由资深脊柱外科医生来矫正复杂的畸形。这种类型的矫正手术具有挑战性,通常需要长时间的手术,与普通脊柱手术相比,随后的并发症发生率更高。文献中很少有资料比较复杂脊柱手术的单期后路手术与分期后路矫正的结果。单阶段手术是通过单阶段后路手术对复杂畸形进行经典的矫正,而分阶段后路手术是指将手术操作分为两个阶段,在第二个阶段进行最后的矫正。研究临床和放射学资料对确定长期脊柱手术矫正复杂脊柱畸形的安全性和有效性非常有帮助。目的:本研究旨在比较复杂脊柱畸形单期后路矫正与分期后路手术矫正的围手术期和1年疗效。研究设计:前瞻性队列研究。患者和方法:患者样本:本研究共招募了22例复杂脊柱畸形患者(12例,一期手术;10、两阶段操作)。结果测量:收集和分析围手术期和术后一年的临床和放射学资料。数据包括手术时间、出血量、术后即刻Cobb角、1年Cobb角及畸形矫正率、1年矫正率、1年并发症发生率。结果两组术后即刻Cobb角(33.0±15.0,一期手术)比较差异无统计学意义;30.8±14.8,两段手术;P = 0.771);一年内矫正率(60.7±12.0%),一期手术;60.1±16.1%,两段操作;P = 0.974);一年矫正损失%(7.8±3.2),一期手术;6.3±3.3,两段运行;P = 0.238);1年并发症发生率83.3%,一期手术;60%,两段操作;P = 0.348)。两组患者一期手术总失血量(3366.7±499.7 ml)比较,差异有统计学意义;4035.0±887.0 ml两级操作;P=0.038),总手术时间(353.3±46.8 min),一期手术;两段运行486.5±131.5分钟;P = 0.011)。神经系统并发症(16.7%)和螺钉错位(25%)仅在一期手术中被报道(然而,当比较两组的总并发症时,这在统计学上无显著意义(c2=1.833和2.895,分别对应;P=0.481和0.221)。神经系统并发症与手术时间(415±35.4 min) (P=0.033)、平均失血量(4100±141.4 ml) (P=0.014)、术后血红蛋白(Hb)(5.5±0.7 g) (P=0.002)直接相关。结论:我们的数据表明,在任何冗长的脊柱手术(≥415分钟)和失血过多(≥4100毫升)的手术中,都应考虑分期复杂的脊柱手术,以防止和防止不可逆的神经损伤。(2019ESJ186)复杂脊柱手术单期后路手术与分期后路矫正的疗效比较。单阶段手术是通过单阶段后路手术对复杂畸形进行经典的矫正,而分阶段后路手术是指将手术操作分为两个阶段,在第二个阶段进行最后的矫正。研究临床和放射学资料对确定长期脊柱手术矫正复杂脊柱畸形的安全性和有效性非常有帮助。目的:本研究旨在比较复杂脊柱畸形单期后路矫正与分期后路手术矫正的围手术期和1年疗效。研究设计:前瞻性队列研究。患者和方法:患者样本:本研究共招募了22例复杂脊柱畸形患者(12例,一期手术;10、两阶段操作)。结果测量:收集和分析围手术期和术后一年的临床和放射学资料。数据包括手术时间、出血量、术后即刻Cobb角、1年Cobb角及畸形矫正率、1年矫正率、1年并发症发生率。结果两组术后即刻Cobb角(33.0±15.0,一期手术)比较差异无统计学意义;30.8±14.8,两段手术;P = 0.771);一年内改正率(60.7±12)。 0%,一期操作;60.1±16.1%,两段操作;P = 0.974);一年矫正损失%(7.8±3.2),一期手术;6.3±3.3,两段运行;P = 0.238);1年并发症发生率83.3%,一期手术;60%,两段操作;P = 0.348)。两组患者一期手术总失血量(3366.7±499.7 ml)比较,差异有统计学意义;4035.0±887.0 ml两级操作;P=0.038),总手术时间(353.3±46.8 min),一期手术;两段运行486.5±131.5分钟;P = 0.011)。神经系统并发症(16.7%)和螺钉错位(25%)仅在一期手术中被报道(然而,当比较两组的总并发症时,这在统计学上无显著意义(=1.833和2.895,分别;P=0.481和0.221)。神经系统并发症与手术时间(415±35.4 min) (P=0.033)、平均失血量(4100±141.4 ml) (P=0.014)、术后血红蛋白(Hb)(5.5±0.7 g) (P=0.002)直接相关。结论:我们的数据表明,在任何冗长的脊柱手术(≥415分钟)和失血过多(≥4100毫升)的手术中,都应考虑分期复杂的脊柱手术,以防止和防止不可逆的神经损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Planned staging for posterior surgical correction of multi-planar spinal deformities, does it differ?
Background Data: Complex spine surgery is a challenging and difficult procedure. It has to be performed by senior spine surgeons to correct complex deformities. This type of corrective procedures can be challenging and commonly requires long Background Data: Complex spine surgery is a challenging and difficult procedure. It has to be performed by senior spine surgeons to correct complex deformities. This type of corrective procedures can be challenging and commonly requires long operations, with subsequent higher rates of complications when compared to ordinary spine operations. The literature has few data comparing the outcomes of single-stage posterior operation versus staged posterior correction of complex spine surgery. Single-session surgery entails the classical correction of complex deformities via a single-stage posterior operation, while staged posterior surgery means dividing the surgical maneuver into two posterior sessions with the final correction being performed in the second session. Studying the clinical and radiological data is extremely helpful in determining the safety and effectiveness of staginglong spinal operations for the correction of complex spinal deformities. Purpose: This study aims to compare perioperative and 1-year outcomes of single-stage posterior correction versus staged posterior surgical correction of complex spine deformities. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Patients and Methods: Patient sample: A total of 22 patients with complex spinal deformity were recruited for this study (12, one-stage operation; 10, two-stage operation). Outcome measures: Perioperative and one-year postoperative clinical and radiological data were collected and analyzed. Data included operative time, blood loss, immediate postoperative Cobb angle, one-year Cobb angle and percentage of correction of the deformity, one-year loss of correction, and one-year complication rate. Results There were no significant differences between the 2 groups as regards immediate postoperative Cobb angle (33.0±15.0, one-stage operation; 30.8±14.8, two-stage operation; P=0.771); percentage of correction within one year (60.7±12.0%, one-stage operation; 60.1±16.1%, two-stage operation; P=0.974);  one-year loss of correction % (7.8±3.2, one-stage operation; 6.3±3.3, two-stage operation; P=0.238); one-year complication rate (83.3%, one-stage operation; 60%, two-stage operation; P=0.348). However, statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of the total blood loss (3366.7±499.7 ml, one-stage operation; 4035.0±887.0 ml two-stage operation; P=0.038) and total operative time (353.3±46.8 min, one-stage operation; 486.5±131.5 min two-stage operation; P=0.011). Neurological complications (16.7%) and malpositioned screws (25%) were reported only in one-stage operations (however, this was statistically nonsignificant when comparing total complications in both groups (c2=1.833 and 2.895, resp.; P=0.481 and 0.221, resp.). Neurological complications were directly related to operative time (415±35.4 min) (P=0.033), average blood loss (4100±141.4 ml) (P=0.014), and postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) (5.5±0.7 g) (P=0.002). Conclusion: Our data suggest that staging complex spine procedures should be considered in any lengthy spinal operations (≥ 415 min) and operations with excessive blood loss (≥ 4100 ml) to protect against and prevent irreversible neurological insults. (2019ESJ186) the outcomes of single-stage posterior operation versus staged posterior correction of complex spine surgery. Single-session surgery entails the classical correction of complex deformities via a single-stage posterior operation, while staged posterior surgery means dividing the surgical maneuver into two posterior sessions with the final correction being performed in the second session. Studying the clinical and radiological data is extremely helpful in determining the safety and effectiveness of staging long spinal operations for the correction of complex spinal deformities. Purpose: This study aims to compare perioperative and 1-year outcomes of single-stage posterior correction versus staged posterior surgical correction of complex spine deformities. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Patients and Methods: Patient sample: A total of 22 patients with complex spinal deformity were recruited for this study (12, one-stage operation; 10, two-stage operation). Outcome measures: Perioperative and one-year postoperative clinical and radiological data were collected and analyzed. Data included operative time, blood loss, immediate postoperative Cobb angle, one-year Cobb angle and percentage of correction of the deformity, one-year loss of correction, and one-year complication rate. Results There were no significant differences between the 2 groups as regards immediate postoperative Cobb angle (33.0±15.0, one-stage operation; 30.8±14.8, two-stage operation; P=0.771); percentage of correction within one year (60.7±12.0%, one-stage operation; 60.1±16.1%, two-stage operation; P=0.974); one-year loss of correction % (7.8±3.2, one-stage operation; 6.3±3.3, two-stage operation; P=0.238); one-year complication rate (83.3%, one-stage operation; 60%, two-stage operation; P=0.348). However, statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of the total blood loss (3366.7±499.7 ml, one-stage operation; 4035.0±887.0 ml two-stage operation; P=0.038) and total operative time (353.3±46.8 min, one-stage operation; 486.5±131.5 min two-stage operation; P=0.011). Neurological complications (16.7%) and malpositioned screws (25%) were reported only in one-stage operations (however, this was statistically nonsignificant when comparing total complications in both groups (=1.833 and 2.895, resp.; P=0.481 and 0.221, resp.). Neurological complications were directly related to operative time (415±35.4 min) (P=0.033), average blood loss (4100±141.4 ml) (P=0.014), and postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) (5.5±0.7 g) (P=0.002). Conclusion: Our data suggest that staging complex spine procedures should be considered in any lengthy spinal operations (≥ 415 min) and operations with excessive blood loss (≥ 4100 ml) to protect against and prevent irreversible neurological insults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Extremity Peripheral Nerve Injuries: Is There Any Role of Specialized Field Hospital in the Management of Low-Velocity Penetrating Peripheral Nerve Injuries? Short-Segment Posterior Fixation with Index Level Screws versus Long-Segment Posterior Fixation in Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Awake Spine Surgery: Fad or Future? Pedicle Screw/Sublaminar Hook Fixation versus Pedicle Screw/Infraspinous Wire Fixation for Spondylolysis Repair: A Retrospective Comparative Study with MSCT Assessment Absence of the Musculocutaneous Nerve While Performing Nerve Transfer Surgery in a Patient with Brachial Plexus Injury, Rare Variant, and Review of Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1