优生学、偏见与人类发展:结构性种族主义的角色

IF 4.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Human Development Pub Date : 2023-07-21 DOI:10.1159/000531312
N. Budwig, Hojin Han, Raquel Jorge Fernandes, Jimin Lee, Sindy Wang, Benjamin Wolff
{"title":"优生学、偏见与人类发展:结构性种族主义的角色","authors":"N. Budwig, Hojin Han, Raquel Jorge Fernandes, Jimin Lee, Sindy Wang, Benjamin Wolff","doi":"10.1159/000531312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his provocative article “ Eugenics, prejudice, and psychological research, ” Turiel (2020, p. 106) raises the important question: “ What does the eugenics movement of the early twentieth century tell us about present times? ” Turiel argues that much theory and research has supported the eugenics movement, and he highlights the importance of considering layperson ’ s thinking on these issues. Drawing on Piaget ’ s work, Turiel notes that thinking is not always correct and highlights the importance of examining the reasoning individuals have for thinking as they do. In his words, “ In order to better understand prejudice, discrimination, and segregation, it is important to also study the thinking that goes into current features of eugenics ” (Turiel, 2020, p. 106). Furthermore, he argues for the “ pressing need to study the psychological thinking underlying eugenics as well as its impact on individuals and societies. ” (Turiel, 2020, p. 107). We applaud such work and the continued efforts of Human Development to provide a platform for this important scholarship (see also special issue by Killen & Ruck, 2021, on Promoting Social Equity, Fairness, and Racial Justice in Development ). In this article, we suggest that research investigating individuals ’ thinking about prejudice and related themes should be augmented by explicit consideration of products beyond individual thinking. Human action is intricately tied to larger cultural and political systems and structures that promote racial and other forms of oppression. To expand on Turiel ’ s suggestions about the eugenics movement for modern times, we draw on the history of the eugenics movement at the turn of the century in America. By doing so, we can better understand how the eugenics movement has in fl uenced contemporary","PeriodicalId":47837,"journal":{"name":"Human Development","volume":"67 1","pages":"170 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eugenics, Prejudice, and Human Development Revisited: The Role of Structural Racism\",\"authors\":\"N. Budwig, Hojin Han, Raquel Jorge Fernandes, Jimin Lee, Sindy Wang, Benjamin Wolff\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000531312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his provocative article “ Eugenics, prejudice, and psychological research, ” Turiel (2020, p. 106) raises the important question: “ What does the eugenics movement of the early twentieth century tell us about present times? ” Turiel argues that much theory and research has supported the eugenics movement, and he highlights the importance of considering layperson ’ s thinking on these issues. Drawing on Piaget ’ s work, Turiel notes that thinking is not always correct and highlights the importance of examining the reasoning individuals have for thinking as they do. In his words, “ In order to better understand prejudice, discrimination, and segregation, it is important to also study the thinking that goes into current features of eugenics ” (Turiel, 2020, p. 106). Furthermore, he argues for the “ pressing need to study the psychological thinking underlying eugenics as well as its impact on individuals and societies. ” (Turiel, 2020, p. 107). We applaud such work and the continued efforts of Human Development to provide a platform for this important scholarship (see also special issue by Killen & Ruck, 2021, on Promoting Social Equity, Fairness, and Racial Justice in Development ). In this article, we suggest that research investigating individuals ’ thinking about prejudice and related themes should be augmented by explicit consideration of products beyond individual thinking. Human action is intricately tied to larger cultural and political systems and structures that promote racial and other forms of oppression. To expand on Turiel ’ s suggestions about the eugenics movement for modern times, we draw on the history of the eugenics movement at the turn of the century in America. By doing so, we can better understand how the eugenics movement has in fl uenced contemporary\",\"PeriodicalId\":47837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Development\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"170 - 172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531312\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531312","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在他的煽动性文章《优生学、偏见和心理学研究》中,图里尔(2020,第106页)提出了一个重要问题:“20世纪初的优生学运动告诉我们当今时代的情况是什么?”图里尔认为,许多理论和研究都支持优生学运动,他强调了考虑外行对这些问题的思考的重要性。根据皮亚杰的工作,图里尔指出,思维并不总是正确的,并强调了在思考时审视个人推理的重要性。用他的话说,“为了更好地理解偏见、歧视和隔离,研究优生学当前特征的思维也很重要”(图里尔,2020,第106页)。此外,他认为“迫切需要研究优生学背后的心理思维及其对个人和社会的影响”(Turiel,2020,第107页)。我们赞扬这样的工作,以及人类发展组织为这一重要奖学金提供平台的持续努力(另见Killen&Ruck,2021,《促进发展中的社会公平、公平和种族正义》特刊)。在这篇文章中,我们建议调查个人对偏见和相关主题的思考的研究应该通过明确考虑个人思维之外的产品来加强。人类行动与促进种族和其他形式压迫的更大的文化和政治制度和结构密切相关。为了进一步阐述图里尔关于近代优生学运动的建议,我们借鉴了世纪之交美国优生学运动史。通过这样做,我们可以更好地理解优生学运动是如何影响当代的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eugenics, Prejudice, and Human Development Revisited: The Role of Structural Racism
In his provocative article “ Eugenics, prejudice, and psychological research, ” Turiel (2020, p. 106) raises the important question: “ What does the eugenics movement of the early twentieth century tell us about present times? ” Turiel argues that much theory and research has supported the eugenics movement, and he highlights the importance of considering layperson ’ s thinking on these issues. Drawing on Piaget ’ s work, Turiel notes that thinking is not always correct and highlights the importance of examining the reasoning individuals have for thinking as they do. In his words, “ In order to better understand prejudice, discrimination, and segregation, it is important to also study the thinking that goes into current features of eugenics ” (Turiel, 2020, p. 106). Furthermore, he argues for the “ pressing need to study the psychological thinking underlying eugenics as well as its impact on individuals and societies. ” (Turiel, 2020, p. 107). We applaud such work and the continued efforts of Human Development to provide a platform for this important scholarship (see also special issue by Killen & Ruck, 2021, on Promoting Social Equity, Fairness, and Racial Justice in Development ). In this article, we suggest that research investigating individuals ’ thinking about prejudice and related themes should be augmented by explicit consideration of products beyond individual thinking. Human action is intricately tied to larger cultural and political systems and structures that promote racial and other forms of oppression. To expand on Turiel ’ s suggestions about the eugenics movement for modern times, we draw on the history of the eugenics movement at the turn of the century in America. By doing so, we can better understand how the eugenics movement has in fl uenced contemporary
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Development
Human Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Distinguished by its international recognition since 1958, "Human Development" publishes in-depth conceptual articles, commentaries, and essay book reviews that advance our understanding of developmental phenomena. Contributions serve to raise theoretical issues, flesh out interesting and potentially powerful ideas, and differentiate key constructs. Contributions are welcomed from varied disciplines, including anthropology, biology, education, history, philosophy, psychology, and sociology.
期刊最新文献
A Theoretical Framework of the Role of Racism in Adolescent Personal Identity Development: Applications to Racially Marginalized Youth in the U.S. Cheating Engagedly Described and the Judgment-Action Gap Narrowed Widely New Editorship of Human Development The Metaphysics of Development and Evolution. From Thing Ontology to Process Ontology Development of Primal World Beliefs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1