{"title":"官吏与异端:吴俊卿对中国国家话语“异端”的建构(述评)","authors":"Kaiqi Hua","doi":"10.1353/jcr.2019.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"emperor’s 嘉靖 (1522–66) anti-Buddhist measures, as well as the diminished influence (and slashed stipends) of local principalities. This matter warrants attention, because the mid-sixteenth century truly marks the end of the social order that followed the Mongol invasion. Fourth, one would like to know more about Daoist clergy who did not belong to the Quanzhen order but still filled vital roles in Shanxi religious life. At the Cangshan shrine, for example, literati supplied no fewer than five stelae for the resident Daoists in the 1631–44 period, suggesting that clergy commanded considerable respect (p. 250, n. 105). Finally, as the site of north China’s pre-eminent Buddhist site, Mount Wutai, and home to many large, extremely expensive Ming principalities, Shanxi was special, and one wonders if the local histories of other north China regions took similar trajectories in the 1200–1600 epoch. Such questions aside, this work charts new territories in late imperial religious and social history. It employs many epigraphical collections only recently published or rarely used. It has useful maps, charts, and photographs. Wang writes in lucid, succinct prose, and her forceful conclusion synthesizes ably the book’s arguments and compares instructively her results with the social landscapes of south China. Her astute, path-breaking study deserves the attention of all late imperial historians and will be read and discussed for many years to come.","PeriodicalId":53120,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Religions","volume":"47 1","pages":"244 - 246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mandarins and Heretics: The Construction of \\\"Heresy\\\" in Chinese State Discourse by Junqing Wu (review)\",\"authors\":\"Kaiqi Hua\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jcr.2019.0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"emperor’s 嘉靖 (1522–66) anti-Buddhist measures, as well as the diminished influence (and slashed stipends) of local principalities. This matter warrants attention, because the mid-sixteenth century truly marks the end of the social order that followed the Mongol invasion. Fourth, one would like to know more about Daoist clergy who did not belong to the Quanzhen order but still filled vital roles in Shanxi religious life. At the Cangshan shrine, for example, literati supplied no fewer than five stelae for the resident Daoists in the 1631–44 period, suggesting that clergy commanded considerable respect (p. 250, n. 105). Finally, as the site of north China’s pre-eminent Buddhist site, Mount Wutai, and home to many large, extremely expensive Ming principalities, Shanxi was special, and one wonders if the local histories of other north China regions took similar trajectories in the 1200–1600 epoch. Such questions aside, this work charts new territories in late imperial religious and social history. It employs many epigraphical collections only recently published or rarely used. It has useful maps, charts, and photographs. Wang writes in lucid, succinct prose, and her forceful conclusion synthesizes ably the book’s arguments and compares instructively her results with the social landscapes of south China. Her astute, path-breaking study deserves the attention of all late imperial historians and will be read and discussed for many years to come.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Religions\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"244 - 246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jcr.2019.0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jcr.2019.0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mandarins and Heretics: The Construction of "Heresy" in Chinese State Discourse by Junqing Wu (review)
emperor’s 嘉靖 (1522–66) anti-Buddhist measures, as well as the diminished influence (and slashed stipends) of local principalities. This matter warrants attention, because the mid-sixteenth century truly marks the end of the social order that followed the Mongol invasion. Fourth, one would like to know more about Daoist clergy who did not belong to the Quanzhen order but still filled vital roles in Shanxi religious life. At the Cangshan shrine, for example, literati supplied no fewer than five stelae for the resident Daoists in the 1631–44 period, suggesting that clergy commanded considerable respect (p. 250, n. 105). Finally, as the site of north China’s pre-eminent Buddhist site, Mount Wutai, and home to many large, extremely expensive Ming principalities, Shanxi was special, and one wonders if the local histories of other north China regions took similar trajectories in the 1200–1600 epoch. Such questions aside, this work charts new territories in late imperial religious and social history. It employs many epigraphical collections only recently published or rarely used. It has useful maps, charts, and photographs. Wang writes in lucid, succinct prose, and her forceful conclusion synthesizes ably the book’s arguments and compares instructively her results with the social landscapes of south China. Her astute, path-breaking study deserves the attention of all late imperial historians and will be read and discussed for many years to come.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chinese Religions is an international, peer-reviewed journal, published under the auspices of the Society for the Study of Chinese Religions (SSCR). Since its founding, the Journal has provided a forum for studies in Chinese religions from a great variety of disciplinary perspectives, including religious studies, philology, history, art history, anthropology, sociology, political science, archaeology, and literary studies. The Journal welcomes original research articles, shorter research notes, essays, and field reports on all aspects of Chinese religions in all historical periods. All submissions need to undergo double-blind peer review before they can be accepted for publication.