{"title":"卡杜协议","authors":"M. Baerman","doi":"10.1075/dia.20068.bae","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Krongo, a member of the Kadu family (Nuba Mountains, Sudan), has four agreement classes: feminine, masculine,\n neuter and plural (Reh 1985). Nominal number-marking prefixes play a key role in class\n assignment: productive plural prefixes trigger plural agreement, and productive singular prefixes trigger neuter agreement. In\n most other Kadu languages, there is no distinction between plural and neuter classes. Comparative and typological evidence shows\n that Krongo’s system represents the older state of affairs. It is argued that the motivation for the merger of these two classes\n was a morphosyntactic abstraction over agreement rules. Two distinct rules, one for singular prefixes and one for plural prefixes,\n were replaced by a single rule that assigned the same agreement class to all productive number prefixes, regardless of whether\n they mark singular or plural. The result is the morphosyntactic mirror-image of an inverse number system, such as is found in, for\n example, Dagaare (Grimm 2012).","PeriodicalId":44637,"journal":{"name":"Diachronica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement in Kadu\",\"authors\":\"M. Baerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/dia.20068.bae\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Krongo, a member of the Kadu family (Nuba Mountains, Sudan), has four agreement classes: feminine, masculine,\\n neuter and plural (Reh 1985). Nominal number-marking prefixes play a key role in class\\n assignment: productive plural prefixes trigger plural agreement, and productive singular prefixes trigger neuter agreement. In\\n most other Kadu languages, there is no distinction between plural and neuter classes. Comparative and typological evidence shows\\n that Krongo’s system represents the older state of affairs. It is argued that the motivation for the merger of these two classes\\n was a morphosyntactic abstraction over agreement rules. Two distinct rules, one for singular prefixes and one for plural prefixes,\\n were replaced by a single rule that assigned the same agreement class to all productive number prefixes, regardless of whether\\n they mark singular or plural. The result is the morphosyntactic mirror-image of an inverse number system, such as is found in, for\\n example, Dagaare (Grimm 2012).\",\"PeriodicalId\":44637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diachronica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diachronica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20068.bae\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diachronica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20068.bae","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Krongo, a member of the Kadu family (Nuba Mountains, Sudan), has four agreement classes: feminine, masculine,
neuter and plural (Reh 1985). Nominal number-marking prefixes play a key role in class
assignment: productive plural prefixes trigger plural agreement, and productive singular prefixes trigger neuter agreement. In
most other Kadu languages, there is no distinction between plural and neuter classes. Comparative and typological evidence shows
that Krongo’s system represents the older state of affairs. It is argued that the motivation for the merger of these two classes
was a morphosyntactic abstraction over agreement rules. Two distinct rules, one for singular prefixes and one for plural prefixes,
were replaced by a single rule that assigned the same agreement class to all productive number prefixes, regardless of whether
they mark singular or plural. The result is the morphosyntactic mirror-image of an inverse number system, such as is found in, for
example, Dagaare (Grimm 2012).
期刊介绍:
Diachronica provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of information concerning all aspects of language change in any and all languages of the globe. Contributions which combine theoretical interest and philological acumen are especially welcome. Diachronica appears three times per year, publishing articles, review articles, book reviews, and a miscellanea section including notes, reports and discussions.