《变性人与爱尔兰高地的形成》,1550-1900年。作者:尤金·科斯特洛。第240页。伍德布里奇:博伊德尔出版社。2020。精装本75英镑。

IF 0.3 1区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.1017/ihs.2021.31
L. Kennedy
{"title":"《变性人与爱尔兰高地的形成》,1550-1900年。作者:尤金·科斯特洛。第240页。伍德布里奇:博伊德尔出版社。2020。精装本75英镑。","authors":"L. Kennedy","doi":"10.1017/ihs.2021.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a remarkable study in terms of its chronological sweep, its use of diverse sources and its multi-disciplinary approach to the past. It grapples with the elusive traces left in the Irish landscape by a form of pastoral farming known in the international literature as transhumance and in Ireland as booleying. The author employs archaeological field work, soil science, documentary evidence, place names analysis, oral history and cartography to trace the evolution of this set of farming practices and their eventual demise. Transhumance is an intricate system of farming whereby livestock are moved in summertime from one farming environment, usually lowland farms, up on to the rough pastures found on the slopes of neighbouring hills or mountains. In wintertime the flocks of animals are returned from these commonages to the home farms. The kinds of livestock moved about might include sheep, goats, cows, bulls and bullocks. In this way farmers gained access to additional grazing and economised on land use at home. The distances travelled in these seasonal movements could vary but in Ireland they seem to have been well under twelve kilometres in most cases. As Costello emphasises, booleying involved the movement of people as well as stock. Rough shelters were constructed on the hillsides to house the herders who typically were of adolescent age or children, the opportunity cost of whose labour presumably was low. The numbers of people involved were considerable. Three areas are studied intensively in this work: those of the Carna peninsula, Connemara, County Galway, the parish of Gleann Cholm Cille in south-west Donegal and the Galtee Mountains on the Tipperary– Limerick borderlands. In the first of these two study areas something like one-third of the people were dispatched to the hills to look after livestock. To an outsider to the field this seems surprisingly high, implying large movement and relocation of people, albeit on a temporary seasonal basis. The origins of booleying lie in the medieval period and possibly much earlier. Nor was the practice confined to Gaelic areas. It existed in Old English territories as well. Costello explores the post-medieval period and is refreshingly frank about the speculative nature of much of what can be said before the nineteenth century in view of the paucity of documentation and the absence of more detailed archaeological work. Ironically, the sources become more plentiful when the practice is under pressure from population growth, commercialisation of agriculture (dairying and cattle raising in particular) and efforts at estate improvement. Some theoretical borrowings from the property rights paradigm in the economics literature might perhaps have sharpened some of the valuable insights developed by the author, particularly in relation to transitions over time. Explosive pre-Famine population growth, it is argued, led to a much more crowded rural landscape and eventually reduced opportunities for transhumance. Integration into a wider world of market exchange initially made booleying more attractive, the incentives for commercial butter production being a prime example. But later, in conjunction with population growth, these forces served to restrict the practice. It is noteworthy that landlords by and large seem to have adopted a laissez faire attitude to the practice, though estate policy might indirectly constrict the operations of the system, as happened apparently in the vicinity of the Galtee Mountains. Irish Historical Studies (2021), 45 (168), 333–358. © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd","PeriodicalId":44187,"journal":{"name":"IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transhumance and the making of Ireland's uplands, 1550–1900. By Eugene Costello. Pp 240. Woodbridge: Boydell Press. 2020. £75 hardback.\",\"authors\":\"L. Kennedy\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ihs.2021.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is a remarkable study in terms of its chronological sweep, its use of diverse sources and its multi-disciplinary approach to the past. It grapples with the elusive traces left in the Irish landscape by a form of pastoral farming known in the international literature as transhumance and in Ireland as booleying. The author employs archaeological field work, soil science, documentary evidence, place names analysis, oral history and cartography to trace the evolution of this set of farming practices and their eventual demise. Transhumance is an intricate system of farming whereby livestock are moved in summertime from one farming environment, usually lowland farms, up on to the rough pastures found on the slopes of neighbouring hills or mountains. In wintertime the flocks of animals are returned from these commonages to the home farms. The kinds of livestock moved about might include sheep, goats, cows, bulls and bullocks. In this way farmers gained access to additional grazing and economised on land use at home. The distances travelled in these seasonal movements could vary but in Ireland they seem to have been well under twelve kilometres in most cases. As Costello emphasises, booleying involved the movement of people as well as stock. Rough shelters were constructed on the hillsides to house the herders who typically were of adolescent age or children, the opportunity cost of whose labour presumably was low. The numbers of people involved were considerable. Three areas are studied intensively in this work: those of the Carna peninsula, Connemara, County Galway, the parish of Gleann Cholm Cille in south-west Donegal and the Galtee Mountains on the Tipperary– Limerick borderlands. In the first of these two study areas something like one-third of the people were dispatched to the hills to look after livestock. To an outsider to the field this seems surprisingly high, implying large movement and relocation of people, albeit on a temporary seasonal basis. The origins of booleying lie in the medieval period and possibly much earlier. Nor was the practice confined to Gaelic areas. It existed in Old English territories as well. Costello explores the post-medieval period and is refreshingly frank about the speculative nature of much of what can be said before the nineteenth century in view of the paucity of documentation and the absence of more detailed archaeological work. Ironically, the sources become more plentiful when the practice is under pressure from population growth, commercialisation of agriculture (dairying and cattle raising in particular) and efforts at estate improvement. Some theoretical borrowings from the property rights paradigm in the economics literature might perhaps have sharpened some of the valuable insights developed by the author, particularly in relation to transitions over time. Explosive pre-Famine population growth, it is argued, led to a much more crowded rural landscape and eventually reduced opportunities for transhumance. Integration into a wider world of market exchange initially made booleying more attractive, the incentives for commercial butter production being a prime example. But later, in conjunction with population growth, these forces served to restrict the practice. It is noteworthy that landlords by and large seem to have adopted a laissez faire attitude to the practice, though estate policy might indirectly constrict the operations of the system, as happened apparently in the vicinity of the Galtee Mountains. Irish Historical Studies (2021), 45 (168), 333–358. © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd\",\"PeriodicalId\":44187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ihs.2021.31\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ihs.2021.31","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是一项了不起的研究,就其时间顺序、对各种资料的使用以及对过去的多学科研究方法而言。书中描写了一种在国际文学中被称为transhumance,在爱尔兰被称为booleying的田园农业形式在爱尔兰风景中留下的难以捉摸的痕迹。作者运用考古实地工作、土壤科学、文献证据、地名分析、口述历史和制图来追溯这一套农耕方式的演变及其最终消亡。transshumance是一种复杂的农业系统,在夏季将牲畜从一个农业环境(通常是低地农场)转移到邻近丘陵或山脉斜坡上粗糙的牧场。在冬季,成群的动物从这些公共场所返回到家庭农场。牲畜的种类可能包括绵羊、山羊、奶牛、公牛和公牛。通过这种方式,农民获得了额外的放牧机会,并节约了家中的土地使用。这些季节性迁徙的距离可能有所不同,但在爱尔兰,大多数情况下,它们似乎远低于12公里。正如科斯特洛所强调的那样,交易涉及人员和股票的流动。人们在山坡上建造了简陋的住所,为牧民提供住所,这些牧民通常是青少年或儿童,他们的劳动机会成本可能很低。参与的人数相当多。本研究集中研究了三个地区:卡纳半岛、康尼马拉、戈尔韦郡、多尼戈尔西南部的格伦·乔姆·基尔教区和蒂珀雷里-利默里克边境的加尔蒂山脉。在这两个研究区的第一个地区,大约三分之一的人被派到山上照顾牲畜。对于这个领域的局外人来说,这个数字似乎高得惊人,这意味着大量的人口流动和重新安置,尽管是在暂时的季节性基础上。booleying的起源可以追溯到中世纪甚至更早。这种做法也不局限于盖尔人的地区。它也存在于古英格兰地区。科斯特洛探讨了后中世纪时期,他坦率地指出,由于文献资料的缺乏和更详细的考古工作的缺乏,19世纪之前的许多事情都是投机性质的。具有讽刺意味的是,当这种做法受到人口增长、农业商业化(特别是乳制品和养牛)和房地产改善的压力时,来源变得更加丰富。从经济学文献中的产权范式中借鉴的一些理论可能会使作者提出的一些有价值的见解更加尖锐,特别是在与时间过渡有关的方面。有人认为,饥荒前人口的爆炸性增长导致农村景观更加拥挤,最终减少了人口迁移的机会。最初,与更广阔的市场交换世界的融合使欺诈更具吸引力,商业黄油生产的激励措施就是一个典型的例子。但后来,随着人口的增长,这些力量限制了这种做法。值得注意的是,尽管地产政策可能会间接地限制该系统的运作,但总的来说,房东们似乎对这种做法采取了一种自由放任的态度,就像加尔提山脉附近明显发生的那样。爱尔兰历史研究(2021),45(168),333-358。©作者,2022。由剑桥大学出版社代表爱尔兰历史研究出版有限公司出版
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transhumance and the making of Ireland's uplands, 1550–1900. By Eugene Costello. Pp 240. Woodbridge: Boydell Press. 2020. £75 hardback.
This is a remarkable study in terms of its chronological sweep, its use of diverse sources and its multi-disciplinary approach to the past. It grapples with the elusive traces left in the Irish landscape by a form of pastoral farming known in the international literature as transhumance and in Ireland as booleying. The author employs archaeological field work, soil science, documentary evidence, place names analysis, oral history and cartography to trace the evolution of this set of farming practices and their eventual demise. Transhumance is an intricate system of farming whereby livestock are moved in summertime from one farming environment, usually lowland farms, up on to the rough pastures found on the slopes of neighbouring hills or mountains. In wintertime the flocks of animals are returned from these commonages to the home farms. The kinds of livestock moved about might include sheep, goats, cows, bulls and bullocks. In this way farmers gained access to additional grazing and economised on land use at home. The distances travelled in these seasonal movements could vary but in Ireland they seem to have been well under twelve kilometres in most cases. As Costello emphasises, booleying involved the movement of people as well as stock. Rough shelters were constructed on the hillsides to house the herders who typically were of adolescent age or children, the opportunity cost of whose labour presumably was low. The numbers of people involved were considerable. Three areas are studied intensively in this work: those of the Carna peninsula, Connemara, County Galway, the parish of Gleann Cholm Cille in south-west Donegal and the Galtee Mountains on the Tipperary– Limerick borderlands. In the first of these two study areas something like one-third of the people were dispatched to the hills to look after livestock. To an outsider to the field this seems surprisingly high, implying large movement and relocation of people, albeit on a temporary seasonal basis. The origins of booleying lie in the medieval period and possibly much earlier. Nor was the practice confined to Gaelic areas. It existed in Old English territories as well. Costello explores the post-medieval period and is refreshingly frank about the speculative nature of much of what can be said before the nineteenth century in view of the paucity of documentation and the absence of more detailed archaeological work. Ironically, the sources become more plentiful when the practice is under pressure from population growth, commercialisation of agriculture (dairying and cattle raising in particular) and efforts at estate improvement. Some theoretical borrowings from the property rights paradigm in the economics literature might perhaps have sharpened some of the valuable insights developed by the author, particularly in relation to transitions over time. Explosive pre-Famine population growth, it is argued, led to a much more crowded rural landscape and eventually reduced opportunities for transhumance. Integration into a wider world of market exchange initially made booleying more attractive, the incentives for commercial butter production being a prime example. But later, in conjunction with population growth, these forces served to restrict the practice. It is noteworthy that landlords by and large seem to have adopted a laissez faire attitude to the practice, though estate policy might indirectly constrict the operations of the system, as happened apparently in the vicinity of the Galtee Mountains. Irish Historical Studies (2021), 45 (168), 333–358. © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: This journal is published jointly by the Irish Historical Society and the Ulster Society for Irish Historical Studies. Published twice a year, Irish Historical Studies covers all areas of Irish history, including the medieval period. We thank William E. Vaughn of the management committee of Irish Historical Studies for his permission to republish the following two articles.
期刊最新文献
The impact of military demobilisation on rising Irish migration to London, c.1750–1850 The pope, a knight and a bishop on the edge of Christendom: the politics of exclusion in thirteenth-century Ireland Colonialist intervention in a metropolitan revolution: reconsidering A remonstrance of divers remarkeable passages Ethnographic collections in Northern Ireland and the Solomon Islands tomako (canoe) at the Ulster Museum, 1898–2023 The Weaver Street bombing in Belfast 1922: violence, politics and memory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1