在合格的默认框架中过渡到托管帐户的适当年龄:可能比您想象的要早

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Retirement Pub Date : 2022-10-08 DOI:10.3905/jor.2022.1.125
Keith Gustafson, Christopher R. O'Neill
{"title":"在合格的默认框架中过渡到托管帐户的适当年龄:可能比您想象的要早","authors":"Keith Gustafson, Christopher R. O'Neill","doi":"10.3905/jor.2022.1.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we review evidence of retirement under-saving and potential solutions, as well as empirical evidence regarding investor reaction to negative market returns. We present new corroborating evidence from fund flows around the recent volatile market events in 2020 that indicates a rising loss aversion, just as asset levels become significant with investors approaching retirement. We surmise that recent trading activity implies an aggregate investor preference for target-date fund (TDF) portfolios within a 20-year time horizon of retirement, with a volatility profile that is potentially too conservative for requisite savings in later years, due to concomitant lower portfolio return potential combined with the aggregate under-saving problem. This mismatch in investor preferences is compounded by a reactionary tactical investor trading strategy that essentially buys high and sells low. We propose that the rising investor loss-aversion problem can be mitigated by including guaranteed retirement income products in the asset mix in a defined contribution qualified default investment alternative setting to provide for the desired downside risk protection against extreme events, or else by shifting investors from a TDF to a managed account (MA) setting in later years to accomplish the same goal, or by utilizing both approaches in tandem. Given the evidence of MA utilization in increasing aggregate savings rates, reducing portfolio risk levels and its potential to meaningfully address the serious measured return drag from investor return-chasing behavior, the potential benefits can outweigh the higher average fee burden for managed advice in many cases. The question then becomes at what age do the benefits outweigh the potential costs, on average. Based upon the recent empirical evidence of TDF flow data from 2020 and data on average account balances, we propose that the appropriate age for automatic transition to managed accounts could be as early as 40.","PeriodicalId":36429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retirement","volume":"10 1","pages":"21 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Appropriate Age for Transition to Managed Accounts in a Qualified Default Framework: It Might Be Earlier than You Think\",\"authors\":\"Keith Gustafson, Christopher R. O'Neill\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jor.2022.1.125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we review evidence of retirement under-saving and potential solutions, as well as empirical evidence regarding investor reaction to negative market returns. We present new corroborating evidence from fund flows around the recent volatile market events in 2020 that indicates a rising loss aversion, just as asset levels become significant with investors approaching retirement. We surmise that recent trading activity implies an aggregate investor preference for target-date fund (TDF) portfolios within a 20-year time horizon of retirement, with a volatility profile that is potentially too conservative for requisite savings in later years, due to concomitant lower portfolio return potential combined with the aggregate under-saving problem. This mismatch in investor preferences is compounded by a reactionary tactical investor trading strategy that essentially buys high and sells low. We propose that the rising investor loss-aversion problem can be mitigated by including guaranteed retirement income products in the asset mix in a defined contribution qualified default investment alternative setting to provide for the desired downside risk protection against extreme events, or else by shifting investors from a TDF to a managed account (MA) setting in later years to accomplish the same goal, or by utilizing both approaches in tandem. Given the evidence of MA utilization in increasing aggregate savings rates, reducing portfolio risk levels and its potential to meaningfully address the serious measured return drag from investor return-chasing behavior, the potential benefits can outweigh the higher average fee burden for managed advice in many cases. The question then becomes at what age do the benefits outweigh the potential costs, on average. Based upon the recent empirical evidence of TDF flow data from 2020 and data on average account balances, we propose that the appropriate age for automatic transition to managed accounts could be as early as 40.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retirement\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"21 - 32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retirement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jor.2022.1.125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retirement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jor.2022.1.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们回顾了储蓄不足退休的证据和潜在的解决方案,以及投资者对负市场回报反应的经验证据。我们从2020年最近动荡的市场事件周围的资金流动中提供了新的佐证,这表明人们对损失的厌恶情绪正在上升,正如随着投资者接近退休,资产水平变得重要一样。我们推测,最近的交易活动意味着投资者在退休后20年内对目标日期基金(TDF)投资组合的总体偏好,由于随之而来的投资组合回报潜力较低,再加上总体储蓄不足问题,其波动性可能过于保守,无法在未来几年进行必要的储蓄。投资者偏好的这种不匹配,加上一种反动的策略性投资者交易策略,基本上是高买低卖。我们建议,可以通过将有保障的退休收入产品纳入资产组合中的固定缴款合格违约投资替代设置来缓解投资者不断上升的损失规避问题,以提供针对极端事件的预期下行风险保护,或者通过在未来几年将投资者从TDF转移到管理账户(MA)设置来实现相同的目标,或者通过同时使用这两种方法。鉴于MA在提高总储蓄率、降低投资组合风险水平方面的利用率,以及其有意义地解决投资者追求回报行为造成的严重衡量回报拖累的潜力,在许多情况下,其潜在收益可能超过管理咨询的更高平均费用负担。然后问题就变成了,平均而言,在什么年龄,收益会超过潜在成本。根据2020年TDF流量数据和平均账户余额数据的最新经验证据,我们建议自动过渡到托管账户的合适年龄最早可能为40岁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Appropriate Age for Transition to Managed Accounts in a Qualified Default Framework: It Might Be Earlier than You Think
In this article, we review evidence of retirement under-saving and potential solutions, as well as empirical evidence regarding investor reaction to negative market returns. We present new corroborating evidence from fund flows around the recent volatile market events in 2020 that indicates a rising loss aversion, just as asset levels become significant with investors approaching retirement. We surmise that recent trading activity implies an aggregate investor preference for target-date fund (TDF) portfolios within a 20-year time horizon of retirement, with a volatility profile that is potentially too conservative for requisite savings in later years, due to concomitant lower portfolio return potential combined with the aggregate under-saving problem. This mismatch in investor preferences is compounded by a reactionary tactical investor trading strategy that essentially buys high and sells low. We propose that the rising investor loss-aversion problem can be mitigated by including guaranteed retirement income products in the asset mix in a defined contribution qualified default investment alternative setting to provide for the desired downside risk protection against extreme events, or else by shifting investors from a TDF to a managed account (MA) setting in later years to accomplish the same goal, or by utilizing both approaches in tandem. Given the evidence of MA utilization in increasing aggregate savings rates, reducing portfolio risk levels and its potential to meaningfully address the serious measured return drag from investor return-chasing behavior, the potential benefits can outweigh the higher average fee burden for managed advice in many cases. The question then becomes at what age do the benefits outweigh the potential costs, on average. Based upon the recent empirical evidence of TDF flow data from 2020 and data on average account balances, we propose that the appropriate age for automatic transition to managed accounts could be as early as 40.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Retirement
Journal of Retirement Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Investment Restrictions on Pension Participants: A Case Study of Nigeria Editor’s Letter The Role of Annuities in Managing Sequence of Returns Risk Approaching and in Retirement guest commentary Valuation of Financial Decision-Making Retirement Planning, Retirement Insecurity, and Financial Satisfaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1