对参与式植物育种中播种率及其对小麦群体表型表达的影响的质疑——比利时和荷兰有机农场实地研究的首次发现

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Organic Farming Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI:10.12924/of2019.05010037
S. Baltazar, Raphaël Boutsen, L. Delanote, V. Delobel, K. Dewaele, Willem A. Stoop, M. Visser
{"title":"对参与式植物育种中播种率及其对小麦群体表型表达的影响的质疑——比利时和荷兰有机农场实地研究的首次发现","authors":"S. Baltazar, Raphaël Boutsen, L. Delanote, V. Delobel, K. Dewaele, Willem A. Stoop, M. Visser","doi":"10.12924/of2019.05010037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Belgium and The Netherlands, bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is getting attention within a growing movement looking for more sustainability of wheat cropping and breadmaking. The few varieties available are pure lines that do not match the wide range of environments and organic farming practices, so that yields and milling quality are often disappointing. Composite Cross Populations (CCP) have been created with the idea of evolutionary plant breeding through on-farm mass selection and seed saving. In 2015–2016, one such CCP of winter wheat was cropped side by side with a pure line variety in four organic farms with different wheat cropping practices, as a first step to answer some of the concerns arising from farmers’ networks we work with. Seeding rates ranged from the standard high to the very low ones practiced under the System of Wheat Intensification (SWI). Multivariate data analysis confirmed greater differentiation of the CCP both compared with pure line varieties and within populations on farms where inter-plant competition was less intense. Low seeding rates thus seem to enhance the phenotypic expression potential of a CCP, yet this is a neglected fact among participatory plant breeders. Since both CCP and SWI have great potential for ecological intensification within organic farming, we argue that more work is needed on finding new ways of combining innovation in farming practices and on-farm plant breeding, which also implies new ways of organising research.","PeriodicalId":36542,"journal":{"name":"Organic Farming","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questioning Seeding Rates and its Influence on Phenotypic Expression of Wheat Populations for Participatory Plant Breeding—First Findings from Field Research across Organic Farms in Belgium and the Netherlands\",\"authors\":\"S. Baltazar, Raphaël Boutsen, L. Delanote, V. Delobel, K. Dewaele, Willem A. Stoop, M. Visser\",\"doi\":\"10.12924/of2019.05010037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Belgium and The Netherlands, bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is getting attention within a growing movement looking for more sustainability of wheat cropping and breadmaking. The few varieties available are pure lines that do not match the wide range of environments and organic farming practices, so that yields and milling quality are often disappointing. Composite Cross Populations (CCP) have been created with the idea of evolutionary plant breeding through on-farm mass selection and seed saving. In 2015–2016, one such CCP of winter wheat was cropped side by side with a pure line variety in four organic farms with different wheat cropping practices, as a first step to answer some of the concerns arising from farmers’ networks we work with. Seeding rates ranged from the standard high to the very low ones practiced under the System of Wheat Intensification (SWI). Multivariate data analysis confirmed greater differentiation of the CCP both compared with pure line varieties and within populations on farms where inter-plant competition was less intense. Low seeding rates thus seem to enhance the phenotypic expression potential of a CCP, yet this is a neglected fact among participatory plant breeders. Since both CCP and SWI have great potential for ecological intensification within organic farming, we argue that more work is needed on finding new ways of combining innovation in farming practices and on-farm plant breeding, which also implies new ways of organising research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organic Farming\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organic Farming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12924/of2019.05010037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organic Farming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12924/of2019.05010037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在比利时和荷兰,面包小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)在一场旨在提高小麦种植和面包制作可持续性的种植运动中受到关注。少数可用的品种是纯品系,与广泛的环境和有机农业实践不匹配,因此产量和碾磨质量往往令人失望。复合杂交群体(CCP)是通过农场大规模选择和种子保存,以进化植物育种为理念创建的。2015年至2016年,在四个不同小麦种植方式的有机农场,一个这样的冬小麦CCP与一个纯系品种并排种植,这是解决我们合作的农民网络中出现的一些问题的第一步。在小麦强化系统(SWI)下,播种率从标准高到非常低不等。多元数据分析证实,与纯系品种相比,以及在植物间竞争不那么激烈的农场种群内,CCP的分化更大。因此,低播种率似乎提高了CCP的表型表达潜力,但这在参与式植物育种家中是一个被忽视的事实。由于CCP和SWI在有机农业中都具有巨大的生态强化潜力,我们认为需要更多的工作来寻找将农业实践创新和农场植物育种相结合的新方法,这也意味着组织研究的新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Questioning Seeding Rates and its Influence on Phenotypic Expression of Wheat Populations for Participatory Plant Breeding—First Findings from Field Research across Organic Farms in Belgium and the Netherlands
In Belgium and The Netherlands, bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is getting attention within a growing movement looking for more sustainability of wheat cropping and breadmaking. The few varieties available are pure lines that do not match the wide range of environments and organic farming practices, so that yields and milling quality are often disappointing. Composite Cross Populations (CCP) have been created with the idea of evolutionary plant breeding through on-farm mass selection and seed saving. In 2015–2016, one such CCP of winter wheat was cropped side by side with a pure line variety in four organic farms with different wheat cropping practices, as a first step to answer some of the concerns arising from farmers’ networks we work with. Seeding rates ranged from the standard high to the very low ones practiced under the System of Wheat Intensification (SWI). Multivariate data analysis confirmed greater differentiation of the CCP both compared with pure line varieties and within populations on farms where inter-plant competition was less intense. Low seeding rates thus seem to enhance the phenotypic expression potential of a CCP, yet this is a neglected fact among participatory plant breeders. Since both CCP and SWI have great potential for ecological intensification within organic farming, we argue that more work is needed on finding new ways of combining innovation in farming practices and on-farm plant breeding, which also implies new ways of organising research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Organic Farming
Organic Farming Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
On-farm Validation of Coffee arabica and Aloe vera Extracts for Management of Seed-Borne Bacterial Leaf Spot Disease of Tomato Growth and Yield Responses of Leafy Vegetables Grown in Organic and Conventional Agriculture Systems On-farm Research to Diversify Organic Farming Systems A Proposal for Improving Organic Group Certification Quantification of Internal Control Systems' Performance and Sample Size Determination Carrying Capacity of Traditional Farming in South East England: A Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1