儿童目击者回忆中的认知技能、个体差异和非语言访谈方法

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Cognitive Psychology Pub Date : 2022-11-29 DOI:10.1080/20445911.2022.2149758
Christiana Iordanou, M. Allen, L. Warmelink
{"title":"儿童目击者回忆中的认知技能、个体差异和非语言访谈方法","authors":"Christiana Iordanou, M. Allen, L. Warmelink","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2022.2149758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigated the interaction between internal characteristics and external prompts (drawing and dramatisation) in children’s eyewitness recall. Eighty-one 3- to 6- year old children witnessed a live event involving an altercation between two actors in their schools. They were asked to tell what happened (Verbal condition), draw what happened while talking about it (Drawing condition), or show and tell by using gestures and mime (Dramatisation condition), one day, two weeks, and approximately six months after the event. Independent measures of temperament, mood, symbolic skills, and language ability were taken. Children in the Drawing condition reported significantly more details about objects than children in the Verbal condition after a two-week delay. Symbolic skills and shyness affected children’s recall. Our findings suggest that considering young children’s cognitive skills and temperamental traits may help facilitate their eyewitness recall.","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":"35 1","pages":"166 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive skills, individual differences, and nonverbal interview methods in children’s eyewitness recall\",\"authors\":\"Christiana Iordanou, M. Allen, L. Warmelink\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20445911.2022.2149758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study investigated the interaction between internal characteristics and external prompts (drawing and dramatisation) in children’s eyewitness recall. Eighty-one 3- to 6- year old children witnessed a live event involving an altercation between two actors in their schools. They were asked to tell what happened (Verbal condition), draw what happened while talking about it (Drawing condition), or show and tell by using gestures and mime (Dramatisation condition), one day, two weeks, and approximately six months after the event. Independent measures of temperament, mood, symbolic skills, and language ability were taken. Children in the Drawing condition reported significantly more details about objects than children in the Verbal condition after a two-week delay. Symbolic skills and shyness affected children’s recall. Our findings suggest that considering young children’s cognitive skills and temperamental traits may help facilitate their eyewitness recall.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Psychology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"166 - 182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2022.2149758\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2022.2149758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究调查了儿童目击者回忆中的内部特征和外部提示(绘画和戏剧化)之间的相互作用。81名3至6岁的儿童目睹了一场现场活动,两名演员在学校发生口角。在事件发生后的一天、两周和大约六个月,他们被要求讲述发生了什么(言语条件),在谈论发生了什么时画画(绘画条件),或者通过手势和哑剧来展示和讲述(戏剧化条件)。对气质、情绪、象征技巧和语言能力进行了独立测量。在延迟两周后,处于绘画状态的儿童比处于言语状态的儿童报告了更多关于物体的细节。象征性技能和害羞影响了孩子的记忆力。我们的研究结果表明,考虑幼儿的认知技能和气质特征可能有助于他们回忆目击者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive skills, individual differences, and nonverbal interview methods in children’s eyewitness recall
ABSTRACT This study investigated the interaction between internal characteristics and external prompts (drawing and dramatisation) in children’s eyewitness recall. Eighty-one 3- to 6- year old children witnessed a live event involving an altercation between two actors in their schools. They were asked to tell what happened (Verbal condition), draw what happened while talking about it (Drawing condition), or show and tell by using gestures and mime (Dramatisation condition), one day, two weeks, and approximately six months after the event. Independent measures of temperament, mood, symbolic skills, and language ability were taken. Children in the Drawing condition reported significantly more details about objects than children in the Verbal condition after a two-week delay. Symbolic skills and shyness affected children’s recall. Our findings suggest that considering young children’s cognitive skills and temperamental traits may help facilitate their eyewitness recall.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Journal of Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Eye-movement methodology reveals a shift in attention from threat to neutral stimuli with self-reported symptoms of social anxiety across children, adolescents and adults Individual differences and counterfactual thinking Distinct patterns of emotional processing in ADHD and anxiety. Evidence from an eye-movement Go/No-Go task Why I am not a Turing machine Self and mother referential processing in phonological false memory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1