采用不同放射治疗技术的局部晚期癌症患者在最终化学放射治疗后的生活质量——对印度患者的现实世界数据研究

Akkineni Naga Prasanthi, Ashwini Gopal, Sukrutha Boggula, Heena Kauser, Vallurupalli Sudhakar Kumar, Deleep Kumar Gudipudi, Alluri Krishnam Raju
{"title":"采用不同放射治疗技术的局部晚期癌症患者在最终化学放射治疗后的生活质量——对印度患者的现实世界数据研究","authors":"Akkineni Naga Prasanthi, Ashwini Gopal, Sukrutha Boggula, Heena Kauser, Vallurupalli Sudhakar Kumar, Deleep Kumar Gudipudi, Alluri Krishnam Raju","doi":"10.14260/jemds.v11i10.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND \nThe standard of care in non-resectable locally advanced head and neck cancer with squamous cell histology is radical radiotherapy (RT) along with concurrent chemotherapy. Previously, these patients were treated with conventional radiotherapy techniques. Such conventional techniques can lead to morbidity with an impact on quality-of-life (QOL) in long-term survivors. Conformal radiotherapy experiences significant improvements in QOL domains versus conventional techniques. Radiotherapy planning and treatment with conformal techniques require advanced and relatively expensive equipment. Our study is aimed at evaluating the feasibility of conventional radiotherapy techniques in terms of quality of life in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients in comparison to the conformal technique in the Indian setting. \nMETHODS \nSixty patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer who received chemo-radiation therapy and came for follow-up after a minimum of two years were scheduled to complete the QOL questionnaire (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 scores). These scores were compared between the patients who were treated with conventional and conformal techniques. \nRESULTS \nResults showed that when comparing EORTC QLQ–C30 scoring, patients who were treated with conventional RT had a significantly higher median score for emotional QOL and lower median scores for fatigue, pain, appetite loss, and financial difficulties as compared to the conformal RT group. But only the financial difficulties scale showed a significant p-value. When comparing EORTC QLQ–H&N35 scores, all QLQ-HN35 scores did not show any significant difference, except for speech problems. Patients treated with the conventional technique had a significantly lower median score for speech problems compared to the conformal RT group. \nCONCLUSIONS \nBased on these results, it is concluded that conventional radiotherapy techniques can be advised to locally advanced head and neck cancer patients when conformal radiotherapy techniques are not available, especially in developing or underdeveloped countries.","PeriodicalId":47072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Life in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients with Different Radiotherapy Techniques after Definitive Chemo Radiotherapy - A Real-World Data Study with Indian Patients\",\"authors\":\"Akkineni Naga Prasanthi, Ashwini Gopal, Sukrutha Boggula, Heena Kauser, Vallurupalli Sudhakar Kumar, Deleep Kumar Gudipudi, Alluri Krishnam Raju\",\"doi\":\"10.14260/jemds.v11i10.219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND \\nThe standard of care in non-resectable locally advanced head and neck cancer with squamous cell histology is radical radiotherapy (RT) along with concurrent chemotherapy. Previously, these patients were treated with conventional radiotherapy techniques. Such conventional techniques can lead to morbidity with an impact on quality-of-life (QOL) in long-term survivors. Conformal radiotherapy experiences significant improvements in QOL domains versus conventional techniques. Radiotherapy planning and treatment with conformal techniques require advanced and relatively expensive equipment. Our study is aimed at evaluating the feasibility of conventional radiotherapy techniques in terms of quality of life in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients in comparison to the conformal technique in the Indian setting. \\nMETHODS \\nSixty patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer who received chemo-radiation therapy and came for follow-up after a minimum of two years were scheduled to complete the QOL questionnaire (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 scores). These scores were compared between the patients who were treated with conventional and conformal techniques. \\nRESULTS \\nResults showed that when comparing EORTC QLQ–C30 scoring, patients who were treated with conventional RT had a significantly higher median score for emotional QOL and lower median scores for fatigue, pain, appetite loss, and financial difficulties as compared to the conformal RT group. But only the financial difficulties scale showed a significant p-value. When comparing EORTC QLQ–H&N35 scores, all QLQ-HN35 scores did not show any significant difference, except for speech problems. Patients treated with the conventional technique had a significantly lower median score for speech problems compared to the conformal RT group. \\nCONCLUSIONS \\nBased on these results, it is concluded that conventional radiotherapy techniques can be advised to locally advanced head and neck cancer patients when conformal radiotherapy techniques are not available, especially in developing or underdeveloped countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds.v11i10.219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds.v11i10.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景不可切除的局部晚期癌症鳞状细胞组织学的护理标准是放射治疗(RT)和同时化疗。以前,这些患者接受常规放射治疗。这种传统技术可能导致发病率,并影响长期幸存者的生活质量(QOL)。与传统技术相比,适形放射治疗在生活质量领域有了显著改善。放射治疗计划和适形技术治疗需要先进且相对昂贵的设备。我们的研究旨在评估与印度环境中的适形技术相比,传统放疗技术在局部晚期癌症患者生活质量方面的可行性。方法对60例局部晚期头颈部癌症患者进行化疗,随访至少2年,完成生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30和QLQ-H&N35评分)。这些评分在接受常规和适形技术治疗的患者之间进行了比较。结果显示,当比较EORTC QLQ–C30评分时,与适形RT组相比,接受常规RT治疗的患者情绪生活质量的中位得分显著较高,疲劳、疼痛、食欲下降和经济困难的中位分数较低。但只有财务困难量表显示出显著的p值。在比较EORTC QLQ–H&N35评分时,除言语问题外,所有QLQ-HN35评分均未显示任何显著差异。与适形RT组相比,接受常规技术治疗的患者的言语问题中位得分明显较低。结论根据这些结果,可以得出结论,当适形放射治疗技术不可用时,特别是在发展中国家或欠发达国家,常规放射治疗技术可以被建议用于局部晚期癌症患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality of Life in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients with Different Radiotherapy Techniques after Definitive Chemo Radiotherapy - A Real-World Data Study with Indian Patients
BACKGROUND The standard of care in non-resectable locally advanced head and neck cancer with squamous cell histology is radical radiotherapy (RT) along with concurrent chemotherapy. Previously, these patients were treated with conventional radiotherapy techniques. Such conventional techniques can lead to morbidity with an impact on quality-of-life (QOL) in long-term survivors. Conformal radiotherapy experiences significant improvements in QOL domains versus conventional techniques. Radiotherapy planning and treatment with conformal techniques require advanced and relatively expensive equipment. Our study is aimed at evaluating the feasibility of conventional radiotherapy techniques in terms of quality of life in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients in comparison to the conformal technique in the Indian setting. METHODS Sixty patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer who received chemo-radiation therapy and came for follow-up after a minimum of two years were scheduled to complete the QOL questionnaire (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 scores). These scores were compared between the patients who were treated with conventional and conformal techniques. RESULTS Results showed that when comparing EORTC QLQ–C30 scoring, patients who were treated with conventional RT had a significantly higher median score for emotional QOL and lower median scores for fatigue, pain, appetite loss, and financial difficulties as compared to the conformal RT group. But only the financial difficulties scale showed a significant p-value. When comparing EORTC QLQ–H&N35 scores, all QLQ-HN35 scores did not show any significant difference, except for speech problems. Patients treated with the conventional technique had a significantly lower median score for speech problems compared to the conformal RT group. CONCLUSIONS Based on these results, it is concluded that conventional radiotherapy techniques can be advised to locally advanced head and neck cancer patients when conformal radiotherapy techniques are not available, especially in developing or underdeveloped countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
180
期刊最新文献
Emphysematous Pyelonephritis with Extension of Air in the Inferior Vena Cava Cytomorphological Pattern of Neoplastic and Non-Neoplastic Breast Lesions - An Institutional Experience of a Rural Tertiary Care Center Nephrotic Syndrome in Pregnancy - Case Reports Case Report - Trauma Induced Vernet’s Syndrome Leptomeningeal Metastases in Carcinoma Rectum with Extensive Skeletal Metastasis - A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1