通过自然资本账户满足决策支持需求:英国国家自然保护区的案例研究

IF 1.9 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI:10.1080/21606544.2022.2062455
T. Sunderland, D. Marsh, Jane Lusardi, C. Hudson, R. Waters
{"title":"通过自然资本账户满足决策支持需求:英国国家自然保护区的案例研究","authors":"T. Sunderland, D. Marsh, Jane Lusardi, C. Hudson, R. Waters","doi":"10.1080/21606544.2022.2062455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Natural Capital Accounts extend traditional balance sheets to include valuation of non-market environmental benefits and asset values. They aim to bring the often-overlooked value of nature into decision-making, thus providing an effective decision-support tool. We compare Natural Capital Accounts to UK decision-support guidance, which leads us to three innovations that we apply to a case study of the National Nature Reserves in England. First, we use a reporting format, which explicitly reports gaps in quantification and valuation. Second, we provide ‘traffic-light’, confidence level information for our value results. Third, we report on the ecological state of assets and incorporate this evidence into the headline results. These innovations address common weaknesses whereby partial monetary values may mislead decision-makers and confidence levels are highly variable, yet often ignored. Information on the ecological state of assets is often only partial, non-systematic and not presented with the summary results. Producing this account required ecological and economic evidence to be treated as equally important. These three innovations produce an account that is transparent and provides a useful snapshot of the condition of natural capital assets.","PeriodicalId":44903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meeting decision support requirements through natural capital accounts: a case study in England’s National Nature Reserves\",\"authors\":\"T. Sunderland, D. Marsh, Jane Lusardi, C. Hudson, R. Waters\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21606544.2022.2062455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Natural Capital Accounts extend traditional balance sheets to include valuation of non-market environmental benefits and asset values. They aim to bring the often-overlooked value of nature into decision-making, thus providing an effective decision-support tool. We compare Natural Capital Accounts to UK decision-support guidance, which leads us to three innovations that we apply to a case study of the National Nature Reserves in England. First, we use a reporting format, which explicitly reports gaps in quantification and valuation. Second, we provide ‘traffic-light’, confidence level information for our value results. Third, we report on the ecological state of assets and incorporate this evidence into the headline results. These innovations address common weaknesses whereby partial monetary values may mislead decision-makers and confidence levels are highly variable, yet often ignored. Information on the ecological state of assets is often only partial, non-systematic and not presented with the summary results. Producing this account required ecological and economic evidence to be treated as equally important. These three innovations produce an account that is transparent and provides a useful snapshot of the condition of natural capital assets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2022.2062455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2022.2062455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要自然资本账户扩展了传统的资产负债表,包括非市场环境效益和资产价值的估值。它们旨在将经常被忽视的自然价值纳入决策,从而提供有效的决策支持工具。我们将自然资本账户与英国决策支持指南进行了比较,这使我们得出了三项创新,并将其应用于英国国家自然保护区的案例研究。首先,我们使用报告格式,明确报告量化和估值方面的差距。其次,我们为我们的价值结果提供“红绿灯”,即信心水平信息。第三,我们报告资产的生态状态,并将这些证据纳入标题结果中。这些创新解决了共同的弱点,即部分货币价值可能会误导决策者,信心水平变化很大,但往往被忽视。关于资产生态状况的信息往往只是部分的、非系统的,没有提供汇总结果。编制这一报告需要将生态和经济证据视为同等重要的证据。这三项创新产生了一个透明的账户,并提供了自然资本资产状况的有用快照。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meeting decision support requirements through natural capital accounts: a case study in England’s National Nature Reserves
ABSTRACT Natural Capital Accounts extend traditional balance sheets to include valuation of non-market environmental benefits and asset values. They aim to bring the often-overlooked value of nature into decision-making, thus providing an effective decision-support tool. We compare Natural Capital Accounts to UK decision-support guidance, which leads us to three innovations that we apply to a case study of the National Nature Reserves in England. First, we use a reporting format, which explicitly reports gaps in quantification and valuation. Second, we provide ‘traffic-light’, confidence level information for our value results. Third, we report on the ecological state of assets and incorporate this evidence into the headline results. These innovations address common weaknesses whereby partial monetary values may mislead decision-makers and confidence levels are highly variable, yet often ignored. Information on the ecological state of assets is often only partial, non-systematic and not presented with the summary results. Producing this account required ecological and economic evidence to be treated as equally important. These three innovations produce an account that is transparent and provides a useful snapshot of the condition of natural capital assets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Animal-welfare-labelled meat is not a stepping stone to animal-free diets: empirical evidence from a survey The fishing industry and the growing food insecurity in Africa: an empirical analysis with an instrumented quantile approach Costless CO 2 emissions abatement through improved government effectiveness The economics of waste oil recycling in the EU Innovation barriers as triggers of firms’ eco-innovations: the mediating role of public and market knowledge sourcing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1