幽门狭窄的幽门切开术:创伤上弯曲皮肤切口和标准(右上象限)皮肤切口的比较研究:在资源有限的情况下进行的研究

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Open Access Surgery Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.2147/oas.s262825
M. Peyvasteh, S. Askarpour, Mahmood Khoshkhabar, H. Javaherizadeh
{"title":"幽门狭窄的幽门切开术:创伤上弯曲皮肤切口和标准(右上象限)皮肤切口的比较研究:在资源有限的情况下进行的研究","authors":"M. Peyvasteh, S. Askarpour, Mahmood Khoshkhabar, H. Javaherizadeh","doi":"10.2147/oas.s262825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The main therapeutic option for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is pyloromyotomy surgical technique which can be performed via different methods, including right upper quadrant (RUQ) transverse incision and supraumbilical curved skin incision; thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate and compare clinical efficacy of supraumbilical curved skin incision and standard (RUQ) skin incision. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 35 patients with HPS were initially evaluated. After evaluating hospital records, 31 patients with completed hospital records were included: 9 from case group and 22 from control group. Demographic information, surgery parameters and postoperative complications were extracted from the hospital records or calling parents. Results: Results showed that the surgery parameters such as surgery duration (P=0.211), postoperative fasting duration (P=0.831), and hospitalization duration (P=0.521) in both groups were similar. Moreover, surgery complications such as duodenal or gastric perforation and surgical site infection did not differ between the groups (P>0.05). While we found that Vancouver Scar Scale was significantly lower in supraumbilical curved skin incision as compared to control group (1.8 ± 0.5 vs 5.1 ± 0.7, P<0.001, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this study showed the beneficial effects of supraumbilical curved skin incision technique on surgery scar outcomes and gives best cosmetic results with minimal complications, which could be replaced to RUQ operative technique and significantly lead to better control of surgery scar.","PeriodicalId":56363,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pyloromyotomy in Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: A Comparative Study Between Supraumbilical Curved Skin Incision and Standard (Right Upper Quadrant) Skin Incision: Study in a Resource Limited Setting\",\"authors\":\"M. Peyvasteh, S. Askarpour, Mahmood Khoshkhabar, H. Javaherizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/oas.s262825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The main therapeutic option for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is pyloromyotomy surgical technique which can be performed via different methods, including right upper quadrant (RUQ) transverse incision and supraumbilical curved skin incision; thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate and compare clinical efficacy of supraumbilical curved skin incision and standard (RUQ) skin incision. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 35 patients with HPS were initially evaluated. After evaluating hospital records, 31 patients with completed hospital records were included: 9 from case group and 22 from control group. Demographic information, surgery parameters and postoperative complications were extracted from the hospital records or calling parents. Results: Results showed that the surgery parameters such as surgery duration (P=0.211), postoperative fasting duration (P=0.831), and hospitalization duration (P=0.521) in both groups were similar. Moreover, surgery complications such as duodenal or gastric perforation and surgical site infection did not differ between the groups (P>0.05). While we found that Vancouver Scar Scale was significantly lower in supraumbilical curved skin incision as compared to control group (1.8 ± 0.5 vs 5.1 ± 0.7, P<0.001, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this study showed the beneficial effects of supraumbilical curved skin incision technique on surgery scar outcomes and gives best cosmetic results with minimal complications, which could be replaced to RUQ operative technique and significantly lead to better control of surgery scar.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/oas.s262825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/oas.s262825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肥厚性幽门狭窄(HPS)的主要治疗选择是幽门肌切开术,可以通过不同的方法进行,包括右上象限(RUQ)横向切口和脐上弯曲皮肤切口;因此,本研究的目的是评估和比较脐上弯曲皮肤切口和标准(RUQ)皮肤切口的临床疗效。材料和方法:在这项回顾性病例对照研究中,对35例HPS患者进行了初步评估。在评估医院记录后,31名有完整医院记录的患者被纳入:病例组9名,对照组22名。从医院记录或致电父母中提取人口统计学信息、手术参数和术后并发症。结果:两组的手术时间(P=0.211)、术后禁食时间(P=0.831)和住院时间(P=0.521)等手术参数相似。此外,十二指肠或胃穿孔和手术部位感染等手术并发症在两组之间没有差异(P>0.05)。同时,我们发现脐上弯曲皮肤切口的Vancouver Scar量表明显低于对照组(分别为1.8±0.5和5.1±0.7,P<0.001)。结论:本研究结果表明,脐上弯曲皮肤切口技术对手术瘢痕效果有利,美容效果最好,并发症最小,可替代RUQ手术技术,显著控制手术瘢痕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pyloromyotomy in Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: A Comparative Study Between Supraumbilical Curved Skin Incision and Standard (Right Upper Quadrant) Skin Incision: Study in a Resource Limited Setting
Background: The main therapeutic option for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is pyloromyotomy surgical technique which can be performed via different methods, including right upper quadrant (RUQ) transverse incision and supraumbilical curved skin incision; thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate and compare clinical efficacy of supraumbilical curved skin incision and standard (RUQ) skin incision. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 35 patients with HPS were initially evaluated. After evaluating hospital records, 31 patients with completed hospital records were included: 9 from case group and 22 from control group. Demographic information, surgery parameters and postoperative complications were extracted from the hospital records or calling parents. Results: Results showed that the surgery parameters such as surgery duration (P=0.211), postoperative fasting duration (P=0.831), and hospitalization duration (P=0.521) in both groups were similar. Moreover, surgery complications such as duodenal or gastric perforation and surgical site infection did not differ between the groups (P>0.05). While we found that Vancouver Scar Scale was significantly lower in supraumbilical curved skin incision as compared to control group (1.8 ± 0.5 vs 5.1 ± 0.7, P<0.001, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this study showed the beneficial effects of supraumbilical curved skin incision technique on surgery scar outcomes and gives best cosmetic results with minimal complications, which could be replaced to RUQ operative technique and significantly lead to better control of surgery scar.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Access Surgery is an international, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that focuses on all aspects of surgical procedures and interventions. Patient care around the peri-operative period and patient outcomes post surgery are key topics for the journal. All grades of surgery from minor cosmetic interventions to major surgical procedures will be covered. Novel techniques and the utilization of new instruments and materials, including implants and prostheses that optimize outcomes constitute major areas of interest. Contributions regarding patient satisfaction, preference, quality of life, and their role in optimizing new surgical procedures will be welcomed. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of case reports, clinical studies, reviews and original research.
期刊最新文献
Affinity of Colonic Granular Cell Tumor Within the Right Colon: Case Report and Review of Literature Rare Classic Presentation of Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Case Report and Literature Review Treatment Outcomes of Non-Traumatic Acute Abdomen and Its Associated Factors in Adult Patients at Tibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia: Cross-Sectional Study Cecal Volvulus in Pregnancy, a Diagnostic Dilemma and Management: A Case Report and Literature Review Appendicitis During Pregnancy: Best Surgical Practices and Clinical Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1